What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Monday, July 6, 2020

June 2020 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed U.S. manufacturing moving back into expansion during June. The PMI registered 52.6%, up 9.5 percentage points (PP) from the May reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. All of the sub-indexes showed improvement: the drop in slow deliveries (-11.1PP) indicates firms are ramping up activity, and the tick downward in customer inventories (-1.6PP) is suggestive of a potential improvement in demand.
“June signifies manufacturing entering an expected expansion cycle after the disruption caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic,” said Timothy Fiore, chair of ISM’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “Comments from the panel were positive (1.3 positive comments for every one cautious comment), reversing the cautious trend which began in March. The manufacturing sector is reversing the heavy contraction of April, with the PMI increasing month-over-month at a rate not seen since August 1980, with several other indexes also posting gains not seen in modern times. 
Click image for larger version
The non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment – also jumped back into expansion (by a record +11.7PP, to 57.1%). The most noteworthy changes in the NMI sub-indexes included business activity (+25.0PP), new orders (+19.7PP), and exports (+17.4PP). “Respondents remain concerned about the coronavirus and the more recent civil unrest,” said Anthony Nieves, chair of the Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “However, they are cautiously optimistic about business conditions and the economy as businesses are beginning to reopen.” 
Click image for larger version
Of the industries we track, only Paper Products contracted. Comments from respondents included:
Wood Products. “The building industry continues to defy expectations, as we continue to rebound stronger from the previous month. Being an essential business across most states and a surge in DIY projects has fueled the industry forward. While the industry will follow the greater economy, we do believe it will be more resilient than most due to potential migration from larger cities and an undersupplied housing market.”
Construction. “Sales have picked up tremendously. Sporadic supply issues. Biggest concern for us is lumber shortages.”
Real Estate. “COVID-19 and the riots have disrupted the normal flow of business. There is no new normal yet.”

Relevant commodities:
Priced higher. Crude oil, lumber products and transportation.
Priced lower. Natural gas.
Prices mixed. Fuel (including diesel).
In short supply. Labor (general, construction and sub-contractors.

Findings of IHS Markit’s June surveys paralleled those of their ISM counterparts, although both Markit surveys remained in contraction.
Manufacturing. Record rise in manufacturing PMI amid looser COVID-19 restrictions.
Key findings:
* Contraction in output slows as new orders stabilize
* First increase in selling prices since February, albeit only fractional
* Job losses ease amid renewed optimism

Services. Business activity contraction slows in June as new business nears stabilization.
Key findings:
* Softest fall in output since February amid strengthening demand
* Renewed increases in cost burdens and selling prices
* Business confidence improves

Commentary by Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist:
Manufacturing. “U.S. manufacturers have reported a marked turnaround in business conditions through the second quarter, with collapsing production and demand in April at the height of the COVID-19 lockdown turning rapidly to stabilization by June. The PMI posted a record 10PP rise in June amid unprecedented gains in the survey’s output, employment and order book gauges.
“The record rise in the New Orders Index, coupled with low inventory holdings, bodes well for a further improvement in production momentum in July. A record upturn in business sentiment about the year ahead likewise hints that business spending and employment will start to revive.
“However, while the PMI currently points to a strong V-shaped recovery, concerns have risen that momentum could be lost if rising numbers of virus infections lead to renewed restrictions and cause demand to weaken again.”

Services. “June saw a record surge in the PMI’s main gauge of business activity in the U.S. as increasing numbers of companies returned to work and expanded their operations amid the reopening of the economy. The survey points to a strong initial rebound from the low point seen at the height of the pandemic lockdown in April, with indicators of output, demand, exports and employment all showing steep gains. Financial services and technology companies are now reporting improved demand, as are many consumer-facing companies. Many, however, remain constrained by social distancing measures.
“With business confidence in the outlook picking up again in June, a return to growth for the economy in the 3Q looks likely, though this will very much depend on the extent to which demand continues to strengthen. There remains a strong possibility that growth could tail off after the initial rebound due to weak demand and persistent virus containment measures. The need to reintroduce lockdowns to fight off second waves of coronavirus infections will pose a particular threat to recovery momentum, and could drive a return of the recession.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, July 2, 2020

May 2020 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments in May increased $12.5 billion or 3.1% to $417.0 billion. Durable goods shipments increased $8.3 billion or 4.4% to $198.0 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $4.2 billion or 2.0% to $219.0 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of wood products rose by 4.0%; paper: -0.2%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $1.1 billion or 0.2% to $687.0 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.65, down from 1.70 in April. Inventories of durable goods increased $0.3 billion or 0.1% to $425.0 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories increased $0.8 billion or 0.3% to $262.0 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of wood products fell by 1.5 %; paper: +0.9%. 
Click image for larger view
New orders increased $30.5 billion or 8.0% to $412.8 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders rose by 2.6% (-13.7% YoY). Durable goods orders increased $26.3 billion or 15.7% to $193.8 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- increased by 1.6% (-7.3% YoY). New orders for nondurable goods increased $4.2 billion or 2.0% to $219.0 billion. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $0.7 billion or 0.1% to $1,108.5 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 7.53, down from 7.70 in April. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a less positive picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders then jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have been trending sideways-to-down.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

June 2020 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey showed non-farm payroll employment added 4.8 million jobs in June (+3.0 million expected). Also, April and May employment changes were revised up by a combined 90,000 (April: -100,000; May: +190,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) receded (-2.2 percentage points) to 11.1% -- although the BLS acknowledged misclassification errors once again artificially lowered the rate -- as the number of employed persons (+4.9 million) expanded by a far wider margin than the labor force (+1.7 million). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* The establishment (+4.8 million jobs) and household survey results (+4.9 million employed) were very highly correlated. 
* Goods-producing industries regained 504,000 jobs, while service-providing employment rocketed higher (+4.296 million jobs) -- especially leisure and hospitality (+2.088 million), retail trade (+739,800), and education and health services (+568,000). Manufacturing expanded by 356,000 jobs. That result is perhaps somewhat consistent the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which contracted much more slowly in June. Wood Products employment advanced by 5,200 (ISM was unchanged); Paper and Paper Products: +1,500 (ISM decreased); Construction: +158,000 (ISM not yet reported). 
Click image for larger view
* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) fell (-1.5 million) to 100.3 million. As a result, the employment-population ratio (EPR) rose to 54.6%; i.e., a little more than half of the employment-age population is presently employed. 
Click image for larger view
* Because the civilian labor force expanded by 1.7 million in June, the labor force participation rate rose (+0.7 PP) to 61.5%. Average hourly earnings of all private employees retreated by $0.35 to $29.37, resulting in a 5.0% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages dipped by $0.23, to $24.74 (+5.4% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls shrank (-0.2 hour) to 34.5 hours, average weekly earnings decreased by $18.01, to $1,013.27 (+3.5% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of +0.1% in May, one's opinion of whether wage earners are keeping up with inflation depends upon the choice of MoM or YoY comparisons. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs advanced (+2.4 million), to 118.9 million. Workers employed part time for economic reasons (shown in the graph above) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- fell by 1.57 million (presumably, in most cases returning to full-time work). Those working part time for non-economic reasons jumped by 2.7 million, while multiple-job holders rose by 681,000. 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity test” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld in June rose by $17.1 billion, to $189.2 billion (+9.9% MoM; -2.4% YoY). To reduce some of the monthly volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending May was 10.8% below the year-earlier average.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

May 2020 Construction Spending

Click image for larger view
Construction spending during May 2020 was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of $1,356.4 billion, 2.1% (±1.0%) below the revised April estimate of $1,386.1 billion (originally $1,346.2 billion); consensus expectations were for +0.8%. The May figure is 0.3% (±1.5%)* above the May 2019 SAAR of $1,352.9 billion; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table below) was -0.6%.
During the first five months of this year, construction spending amounted to $543.2 billion, 5.7% (±1.2%) above the $513.7 billion for the same period in 2019.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The U.S. Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
Private Construction
Spending on private construction was at a SAAR of $1,001.2 billion, 3.3% (±0.7%) below the revised April estimate of $1,035.2 billion (originally $1,004.1 billion):
- Residential: $535.9 billion, -4.0% (±1.3%);
- Nonresidential: $465.3 billion, -2.4% (±0.7%).
Public Construction
Public construction spending amounted to $355.2 billion, 1.2% (±2.0%)* above the revised April estimate of $350.9 billion (originally $342.1 billion):
- Educational: $87.3 billion, +0.1% (±2.0%)*;
- Highway: $106.6 billion, +2.8% (±6.7%)*. 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of May’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

May 2020 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in May 2020 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 676,000 units (630,000 expected). This is 16.6% (±15.5%) above the revised April rate of 580,000 (originally 623,000 units) and 12.7% (±23.5%)* above the May 2019 SAAR of 600,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted (NSA) year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +14.3%. For longer-term perspectives, NSA sales were 51.3% below the “housing bubble” peak but 22.4% above the long-term, pre-2000 average. May was only the second instance in which single-family sales exceeded starts; the previous occurrence was in February 2009.
The median sales price of new houses sold in May rose ($14,900 or +4.9% MoM) to $317,900; meanwhile, the average sales price increased to $368,800 ($16,500 or +4.7%). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 15.6% of the total sold, up from the year-earlier 10.7%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 3.1% of those sold in May, down from 3.6% a year earlier.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in May, single-unit completions decreased by 86,000 units (-9.8%). Since sales jumped (by 96,000 units; +16.6%), inventory for sale contracted in both absolute (-7,000 units) and months-of-inventory (-1.1 months) terms. 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales dropped in May (420,000 units or -9.7%), to a SAAR of 3.91 million units (4.29 million expected). Inventory of existing homes for sale expanded in both absolute (+90,000 units) and months-of-inventory terms (+0.8 month). Because new-home sales rose while resales fell, the share of total sales comprised of new homes jumped to 14.7%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in May slipped to $284,600 ($2,100 or -0.7% MoM). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability improved (+9.6 percentage points) even as the median price of existing homes for sale in April rose by $6,100 (+2.2% MoM; +7.3 YoY), to $288,700. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices rose at a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +1.1% (+4.7% YoY).
“April’s housing price data continue to be remarkably stable,” said Craig Lazzara, Managing Director and Global Head of Index Investment Strategy at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The National Composite Index rose by 4.7% in April 2020, with comparable growth in the 10- and 20-City Composites (up 3.4% and 4.0%, respectively). In all three cases, April’s year-over-year gains were ahead of March’s, continuing a trend of gently accelerating home prices that began last fall. Results in April continued to be broad-based. Prices rose in each of the 19 cities for which we have reported data, and price increases accelerated in 12 cities.
“As was the case in March, we have data from only 19 cities this month, since transactions records for Wayne County, Michigan (in the Detroit metropolitan area) continue to be unavailable. This is, so far, the only directly visible impact of COVID-19 on the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Indices. The price trend that was in place pre-pandemic seems so far to be undisturbed, at least at the national level. Indeed, prices in 12 of the 20 cities in our survey were at an all-time high in April.
“Among the cities, Phoenix retains the top spot for the 11th consecutive month, with a gain of 8.8% for April. Home prices in Seattle rose by 7.3%, followed by increases in Minneapolis (6.4%) and Cleveland (6.0%). Prices were particularly strong in the West and Southeast, and comparatively weak in the Northeast.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, June 25, 2020

1Q2020 Gross Domestic Product: Third Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its third estimate of 1Q2020 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) bumped the growth rate of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of -4.99% (-5.0% expected), up 0.06 percentage point (PP) from the second estimate (“1Qv2”) but -7.11PP from 4Q2019.
As noted in prior 1Q reports, two of the four groupings of GDP components -- net exports (NetX) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 1Q growth; personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and private domestic investment (PDI) detracted.
The headline GDP was essentially unrevised from 1Qv2, thanks to an upward revision to business investment (+0.21PP) that was offset by downward revisions to inventory investment (-0.13PP), consumer spending (-0.04PP), and exports (-0.04PP). 
Click image for larger version
“There really aren't any key points in this report,” wrote Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis. “It is merely filling the time gap before the July 30th initial report on the second quarter. However, its inherent lameness does point out several things:
-- Treating 1Q2020 as a single (and implicitly unified) time span is ridiculous. The March economy bore no resemblance to the January economy, and lumping them together creates a bland “fruit cocktail” that does service to neither apples nor oranges.
-- This is a further indictment of the now over 80-year-old methodologies of the BEA. If that organization cannot provide more timely and more focused data for decision makers, perhaps it is time for major change.
-- And the annualized quarterly reporting regimen is about to present yet another absurdity: according to the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow forecast, on July 30th mainstream media will be reporting that the U.S. economy is contracting at a -45.5% rate. No, the size of the economy is not going to halve over the next 12 months. But annualized quarterly numbers can produce exactly those kinds of headlines.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

May 2020 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in May at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 974,000 units (1.100 million expected). This is 4.3% (±15.5%)* above the revised April estimate of 934,000 (originally 891,000 units), but 23.2% (±6.2%) below the May 2019 SAAR of 1,268,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was -24.4%.
Single-family housing starts in May were at a SAAR of 675,000; this is 0.1% (±11.9%)* above the revised April figure of 674,000 units (-19.3% YoY). Multi-family starts: 299,000 units (+15.0% MoM; -34.1% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total completions were at a SAAR of 1,115,000 units. This is 7.3% (±12.3%)* below the revised April estimate of 1,203,000 (originally 1.176 million units) and 9.3% (±9.8%)* below the May 2019 SAAR of 1,230,000 units; the NSA comparison: -10.0% YoY.
Single-family completions were at a SAAR of 791,000; this is 9.8% (±11.5%)* below the revised April rate of 877,000 units (-11.7% YoY). Multi-family completions: 324,000 units (-0.6% MoM; -5.6% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits amounted to a SAAR of 1,220,000 units (1.220 million expected). This is 14.4% (±1.1%) above the revised April rate of 1,066,000 (originally 1.074 million units), but 8.8% (±1.0%) below the May 2019 SAAR of 1,338,000 units; the NSA comparison: -17.2% YoY.
Single-family permits were at a SAAR of 745,000; this is 11.9% (±1.9%) above the revised April figure of 666,000 units (-19.0% YoY). Multi-family: 475,000 (+18.2% MoM; -14.1% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
“In a sign that housing stands poised to lead a post-pandemic economic recovery,” wrote NAHB’s Robert Dietz, “builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes jumped 21 points to 58 in June, according to the latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). Any reading above 50 indicates a positive market.
“As the nation reopens, housing is well-positioned to lead the economy forward. Inventory is tight, mortgage applications are increasing, interest rates are low and confidence is rising. And buyer traffic more than doubled in one month even as builders report growing online and phone inquiries stemming from the outbreak.
“Housing clearly shows signs of momentum as challenges and opportunities exist in the single-family market. Builders report increasing demand for families seeking single-family homes in inner and outer suburbs that feature lower density neighborhoods.  At the same time, elevated unemployment and the risk of new, local virus outbreaks remain a risk to the housing market,” Dietz concluded.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.