What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Monday, March 2, 2015

January 2015 U.S. Construction Spending

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Overall construction spending in the United States fell 1.1% during January (versus expectations of +0.3%), to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of $971.4 billion. Private construction spending dropped 0.5%. Outlays on residential projects rose 0.6% while non-residential shrank by 1.6%. Spending on public construction projects decreased 2.6%. 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of January’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, February 27, 2015

4Q2014 Gross Domestic Product: Second (Preliminary) Estimate

Click image for larger version
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ (BEA) “preliminary” estimate, 4Q2014 growth in real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) was pegged at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of 2.2% -- down nearly 0.5 percentage point from the previous (“advance”) 4Q estimate, and 2.8 percentage points lower than 3Q’s 5.0%. Analysts had expected a deeper revision to 2.1% (ranging from +1.7 to 2.4%). Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and private domestic investment (PDI) contributed to 4Q growth, while net exports (NetX) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) subtracted from it.
Changes in this report primarily reflected a downward revision to private investment (mainly inventories) and an upward revision to imports that were partly offset by upward revisions to nonresidential fixed investment and to state and local government spending. 
Click image for larger version
Consumer Metrics Institute (CMI) summarized the report as follows:
The revisions in this report are relatively minor, and probably should be considered just "noise" in the context of an economy with a slowing growth rate. Among our observations about this report are:
-- At face value, the 4Q2014 +2.06% "bottom line" Real Final Sales growth rate seems plausible.
-- The reported strong 3-to-4Q growth in fixed investment occurred primarily in two areas: IT spending and the recently added (and very fuzzy) arena of "intellectual property."
-- Rampant or rogue deflators are likely as much a factor in the headline number as real growth.
“Looking forward,” wrote CMI’s analysts, “we are often told that ‘bad weather’ is a major factor in 1Q economic data -- keeping shoppers home and suppressing construction work. Given the quarter-to-quarter weakening already evident in the GDP numbers, 1Q2015 probably wasn’t going to be particularly pleasant even before the recent record snowfalls. It could now be getting just as nasty as the weather itself.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

January 2015 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) declined 0.7% in January (about in line with expectations of -0.6%). The energy index fell 9.7% as the gasoline index fell 18.7% in January, the sharpest in a series of seven consecutive declines. The gasoline decrease was overwhelmingly the cause of the decline in the all items index, which would have risen 0.1% had the gasoline index been unchanged. The fuel oil index also fell sharply, and the index for natural gas turned down, although the electricity index rose. The food index was unchanged in January, with the food at home index falling for the first time since May 2013.
The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2% in January. The shelter index rose 0.3%, and the indexes for personal care, for apparel, and for recreation increased as well. The medical care index was unchanged, while an array of indexes declined in January, including those for household furnishings and operations, alcoholic beverages, new vehicles, used cars and trucks, airline fares, and tobacco. 
The all items index declined 0.1% over the last 12 months, the first negative 12-month change since the period ending October 2009. The energy index fell 19.6% over the span, with the gasoline index down 35.4%. The food index rose 3.2% (thanks, in part, to ground beef increasing by 21%), and the index for all items less food and energy increased 1.6%.  
The seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) decreased 0.8% in January (versus expectations of -0.5%). Final demand prices moved down 0.2% in both December and November. In January, the 0.8% decline in final demand prices can be traced primarily to a 2.1% decrease in the index for final demand goods. Prices for final demand services fell 0.2%.
Final demand goods:  The index for final demand goods moved down 2.1% in January, the seventh consecutive decrease. Prices for final demand energy fell 10.3% -- led by the index for gasoline, which dropped 24.0%. Prices for diesel fuel, jet fuel, basic organic chemicals, dairy products, and home heating oil also moved lower. Conversely, the index for residential electric power moved up 1.2%. The indexes for final demand foods and for final demand goods less foods and energy moved down 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively.
Final demand services:  The index for final demand services decreased 0.2% in January, the first decline since falling 0.3% in September 2014. In January, prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing moved down 0.4%, and the index for final demand transportation and warehousing services dropped 0.8%. In contrast, margins for final demand trade services advanced 0.5%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) 
Click image for larger version
The price indexes we track were mixed on both month-over-month and year-over-year bases in January. The Wood Fiber index hit a new all-time high, however. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

January 2015 U.S. Home Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family homes edged lower in January, by 1,000 units (-0.2%) relative to the previous month, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 481,000. Sales have been essentially flat (averaging 437,000) since January 2013. Sales in January were 9.1% above year-earlier levels.
Meanwhile, the median price of new homes sold declined by $7,800 (-2.6%) to $294,300. The average price of homes sold retreated by a substantial $30,400 (-8.0%), implying that lower-end homes comprised a larger share of new-home sales in January than in December. Because single-family starts decreased faster than sales in January, the three-month average ratio of starts to sales dropped to 1.48; that ratio is just a shade higher than the average since January 1995. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post on January’s housing permits, starts and completions, single-unit completions retreated by 15,000 units (-2.3%). New-home inventory expanded in absolute (+3,000 units) terms while months of inventory was unchanged. 
Existing home sales plunged to a nine-month low in January (-250,000 units or 4.9%) to 4.82 million units (SAAR); expectations were for a drop to 4.95 million. Because sales of new homes fell more slowly than existing homes, the share of total sales comprised of new homes rose to 9.1% (the largest share since August 2008). The median price of previously owned homes sold in January dipped by $8,600 (-4.1%) to $199,600. Inventory of existing homes rose in both absolute (+10,000 units) and months of inventory (+0.3 month).
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability edged lower in December as the median price of existing homes for sale rose by $2,300 (+1.1%) to $210,200. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of less than -0.1% in December (+4.6% relative to a year earlier).
David Blitzer, managing director and chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices observed that “the housing recovery is faltering” despite continued low interest rates and positive consumer confidence. “While prices and sales of existing homes are close to normal, construction and new home sales remain weak. Before the current business cycle, any time housing starts were at their current level of about one million at annual rates, the economy was in a recession.”
“Movements in home prices show clear regional patterns,” Blitzer continued. “The regional patterns and the weakness in new construction and new sales may reflect decreasing mobility -- fewer people moving to different parts of the country or seeking jobs in different regions.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

January 2015 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing starts retreated in January, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 1.065 million units. That level was 22,000 units lower (-2.0%) than December’s 1.087 million units (revised down from 1.089 million). All of the decrease in total starts occurred in the single-family component (-49,000 units or 6.7%); multi-family starts rose by 27,000 units (+7.5%). 
Click image for larger view
The year-over-year percentage change in total starts remained positive in January (+18.3%). Single-family starts were 14.8% above their year-earlier level, and +24.4% for the multi-family component. One can see the magnitude of the seasonal adjustments by comparing the current-month SAAR estimates in the table above with the not-seasonally adjusted year-to-date values. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions rose by 12,000 units (+1.3%) in January, to 930,000 units SAAR. All of the increase occurred in the multi-family component (+27,000 units or 10.6%); the single-family component shrank by 15,000 units (-2.3%). Total completions were 9.6% above their year-earlier level. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits declined in January, decreasing by 7,000 units (-0.7%), to 1.053 million SAAR. All of the decrease occurred in the single-family component (-21,000 units or 3.1%); multi-family permits rose (+14,000 units or 3.6%). January total permits were 3.6% above their year-earlier level.
The latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) shed two points in February (to 55). An index value above 50 means more builders feel the market is good than feel it is poor. “Overall, builder sentiment remains fairly solid, with this slight downturn largely attributable to the unusually high snow levels across much of the nation,” said NAHB Chairman Tom Woods. Interestingly, builder confidence rose in the Northeast (where snowfall has been heaviest) but fell in the Midwest.
“For the past eight months, confidence levels have held in the mid- to upper 50s range, which is consistent with a modest, ongoing recovery,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Solid job growth, affordable home prices and historically low mortgage rates should help unleash growing pent-up demand and keep the housing market moving forward in the year ahead.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2015 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Industrial production (IP) increased 0.2% in January (below expectations of +0.4%) after decreasing 0.3% in December. The rates of change in output for September through December were slightly reduced; even so, production is estimated to have advanced at an annual rate of 4.3% in 4Q2015. In January, manufacturing output (representing 74.3% of the IP index) moved up 0.2% and was 5.6% above its year-earlier level. The index for mining (which makes up 15.9% of the IP index) decreased 1.0%, with the decline more than accounted for by a substantial drop in the index for oil and gas well drilling and related support activities. The output of utilities (9.8% of the IP index) increased 2.3%. At 106.2% of its 2007 average, total IP in January was 4.8% above its level of a year earlier. Wood Products output jumped by 0.5% while Paper was unchanged.  
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector was unchanged in January at 79.4%, a rate that is 0.7 percentage point below its long-run (1972–2014) average. Wood Products and Paper CU both rose by 0.1. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries and manufacturing levels moved higher, both by 0.1%. Wood Products extended its ongoing upward trend (since July 2013) when increasing by 0.3%. Paper, on the other hand, contracted by 0.1% to another new low.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

February 2015 Macro Pulse -- Will Atlas Shrug?

Atlas was the primordial Titan in Greek mythology who held up the celestial spheres. In somewhat similar fashion, the United States “is carrying the world economy at the moment, [but] that is simply not sustainable,” Canadian Finance Minister Joe Oliver recently remarked. “Collectively, [the leading indicators] suggest that the U.S. is not immune to a global slowdown,” agreed Charlie Bilello, research director at Pension Partners. “From easy monetary policy to plummeting yields and inflation expectations, the U.S. looks very much like its global peers.” So, will “Atlas” shrug and allow the global economy to fall? Perhaps the following observations will provide some answers.
Click here to read the rest of the February 2015 Macro Pulse recap.

The Macro Pulse blog is a commentary about recent economic developments affecting the forest products industry. The monthly Macro Pulse newsletter summarizes the previous 30 days of commentary available on this website.