What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Friday, October 2, 2015

September 2015 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment increased by 142,000 jobs in August -- well below expectations of 203,000. Moreover, combined July and August employment gains were slashed by 59,000 (July: -22,000; August: -37,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) was unchanged at 5.1% as a reduction in the number of employed workers (236,000) was “swamped” by a 579,000-person contraction in the labor force. 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment report include:
* The disparity in jobs gains between the establishment (+142,000) and household (-236,000) surveys was quite significant.
* “Employment in mining continued to decline in September (-10,000),” the BLS report said, “with losses concentrated in support activities for mining (-7,000). Mining employment has declined by 102,000 since reaching a peak in December 2014.”
* Manufacturing lost 9,000 jobs in September. Year-to-date through September, manufacturing has gained a net 17,000 jobs; during August and September, however, manufacturing surrendered 27,000 of the 44,000 jobs gained earlier in 2015.
* Construction added 8,000 jobs, bringing the YTD gain to 121,000.
* On a “gross” basis, over 100% (118,700) of September’s private-sector (118,000) job growth occurred in the sectors typically associated with the lowest-paid jobs -- Retail Trade: +23,700; Professional & Business Services: +31,000; Education & Health Services: +29,000; and Leisure & Hospitality: +35,000. This is a persistent issue, as we have repeatedly highlighted: There are 1.43 million fewer manufacturing jobs today than at the start of the Great Recession in December 2007, but nearly 1.47 million more Food Services & Drinking Places (i.e., wait staff and bartender) jobs. 
Click image for larger view
* The employment-population ratio dropped to 59.2%; roughly speaking, for every five people added to the population, fewer than three are employed. Meanwhile, the number of employment-age persons not in the labor force soared by 579,000 to a new record of over 94.6 million. 
Click image for larger view
* The labor force participation rate (LFPR) fell to 62.4%; prior to June the LFPR had not been that low since October 1977. Average hourly earnings of all private employees fell by $0.01 (to $25.09), resulting in a 2.2% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages were unchanged at $21.08 (+1.9% YoY). With the CPI running at an official rate of 0.2% YoY, wages are technically rising in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. The average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls edged down to 34.5 hours in September. 
Click image for larger view
* Finally, full-time jobs fell by 185,000 while part-time jobs inched up by 53,000. Full-time jobs have been trending higher since December 2009, and are 36,000 below the pre-recession high (even while the non-institutional, working-age civilian population has risen by an estimated 18.2 million). Part-time jobs, by contrast, have been stuck in a channel between roughly 27 and 28 million.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, October 1, 2015

August 2015 Construction Spending

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Overall construction spending during August 2015 was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of $1,086.2 billion, 0.7% (±1.5%)* above the revised July estimate of $1,079.1 billion; expectations were for +0.7%. The August figure is 13.7% (±2.1%) above the year-earlier estimate of $955.0 billion.
Year to date through August, construction spending amounted to $683.4 billion, 9.8% (±1.3%) above the $622.4 billion for the same months in 2014.
PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION
Spending on private construction was at a SAAR of $788.0 billion, 0.7% (±0.7%)* above the revised July estimate of $782.3 billion. Residential construction was at a SAAR of $383.3 billion in August, 1.3% (±1.3%)* above the revised July estimate of $378.5 billion. Nonresidential construction was at a SAAR of $404.7 billion in August, 0.2% (±0.7%)* above the revised July estimate of $403.8 billion.
PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION
In August, the estimated SAAR of public construction spending was $298.2 billion, 0.5% (±2.6%)* above the revised July estimate of $296.8 billion. Educational construction was at a SAAR of $67.4 billion, 0.2% (±4.1%)* below the revised July estimate of $67.5 billion. Highway construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $90.4 billion, 0.4% (±6.4%)* below the revised July estimate of $90.7 billion.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The U.S. Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of August’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

August 2015 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family homes increased for a second month in August, rising 30,000 units (+5.7%), to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 552,000 -- well above the 515,000 expected and the fastest rate of sales since February 2008. Sales in August were 25.0% above year-earlier levels; year-to-date (YTD), sales were 19.8% above the same months in 2014. For perspective, however, August sales were roughly 60% below the “bubble” peak and about 13% below the long-term, pre-2000 average.
Meanwhile, the median price of new homes sold rose by a relatively modest $1,600 (+0.6%) to $292,700. The average price of homes sold, on the other hand, jumped by a more robust $8,600 (+2.5%) -- to $353,400 -- implying that a significant proportion of total sales were high-end homes. Because sales increased while single-family starts declined, the three-month average ratio of starts to sales dropped back to 1.42 -- on par with the average (1.41) since January 1995. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in August, single-unit completions rose by 10,000 units (+1.6%). Although completions rose more slowly than sales, new-home inventory expanded in absolute terms (+1,000 units) but declined in months of inventory (-0.2 month). 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales tumbled in August (-270,000 units or 4.8%) to 5.31 million units (SAAR); that result was below expectations of 5.50 million. Because sales of existing homes fell while new homes increased, the share of total sales comprised of new homes rose to 9.4%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in August declined another $3,100 (-1.3%) to $228,700. Inventory of existing homes expanded in both absolute (+30,000 units) and months-of-inventory terms (+0.3 month). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability worsened in July, even though the median price of existing homes for sale retreated by $2,400 (-1.0%) to $235,500. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.7% (+4.7% compared to a year earlier).
“Prices of existing homes and housing overall are seeing strong growth and contributing to recent solid growth for the economy,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The S&P/Case Shiller National Home Price Index has risen at a 4% or higher annual rate since September 2012, well ahead of inflation. Most of the strength is focused on states west of the Mississippi. The three cities with the largest cumulative price increases since January 2000 are all in California: Los Angeles (138%), San Francisco (116%) and San Diego (115%). The two smallest gains since January 2000 are Detroit (3%) and Cleveland (10%). The Sunbelt cities -- Miami, Tampa, Phoenix and Las Vegas -- which were the poster children of the housing boom have yet to make new all-time highs.
“The economy grew at a 3.9% real annual rate in 2Q2015 with housing making a major contribution. Residential investment grew at annual real rates of 9-10% in the last three quarters (4Q2014-2Q2015), far faster than total GDP. Further, expenditures on furniture and household equipment, a sector that depends on home sales and housing construction, also surpassed total GDP growth rates. Other positive indicators of current and expected future housing activity include gains in sales of new and existing housing and the National Association of Home Builders sentiment index. An interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve, now expected in December by many analysts, is not likely to derail the strong housing performance.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, September 25, 2015

2Q2015 Gross Domestic Product: Third (Final) Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its third (“final”) estimate of 2Q2015 U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported that the economy was growing at a 3.92% annualized rate, up +0.22% from previous 2Q estimate and up +3.28% from 1Q. The consensus among economists was for the growth rate to be left unchanged at 3.7%. A better metric involves comparing growth to the same quarter one year ago. For 2Q2015, the year-over-year growth was 2.7% -- down from 1Q2015's 2.9% YoY growth.
All groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 2Q growth. 
Click image for larger version
The BEA made significant upward revisions to the 2Q growth rate contributions from consumer spending on services (+0.30%) and commercial fixed investment (+0.17%). The contribution from inventory growth, by contrast, was revised downward by 0.20% -- slashing the record $136.2 billion (nominal SAAR) QoQ increase reported last month to a mere $0.2 billion in this month’s report. All other segments of the economy were left essentially unchanged.
“Once again the BEA is reporting solid economic growth for the U.S. economy during 2Q2015,” wrote Consumer Metrics Institute. “Presumably, the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) had all of this information available during its latest deliberations on ‘normalizing’ its benchmark interest rates. One might wonder how a nearly 4% official economic growth rate (with unemployment significantly under 6%) merits continued pedal-to-the-metal interest rate stimulus. Which in turn raises the question: What do they know about the economy that isn't reflected in the BEA's report? Or perhaps more to the point: If it is not the U.S. economy or employment that spurs caution within the FOMC, has the Federal Reserve now taken upon itself new global or financial market mandates quite apart from those imposed by Congress?”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

August 2015 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing starts declined in August to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 1.126 million units (1.168 million expected) -- comparable to activity previously seen in November 2007. August’s level was 35,000 units below (-3.0% ±11.3%*) July’s 1.160 million units (revised from 1.206 million). The decrease in total starts was split as follows -- single-family: -23,000 units (-3.0% ±9.5%*); multi-family: -12,000 units (-3.0%).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view
Total starts were 15.9% above their not-seasonally adjusted year-earlier level (single-family: +15.3%; multi-family: +17.0%). Year-to-date (YTD) comparisons to 2014 were all in the +11% range. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions fell by 61,000 units (-6.1% ±12.5%*) in August, to 935,000 units SAAR. The decrease was limited to the multi-family component (-71,000 units or 19.7%); single-family completions rose by 10,000 units (1.6% ±11.0%*). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits partially recouped in August ground lost in July in the wake of a New York City apartment construction tax incentive that expired in mid-June. August permits rose by 40,000 units (+3.5% ±1.4%) to 1.170 million SAAR (1.160 million expected). The absolute increase was about evenly split between the components -- single-family: +19,000 units (+2.8% ±1.7%); multi-family: +21,000 units (+4.7%). YTD total permits were 12.2% above the same months in 2014, driven by the multi-family component (+21.1%).
The latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) ticked up to 62 (+1 point) in September -- the highest level since October 2005. (An HMI value above 50 means more builders feel the market is good than feel it is poor.) “The HMI shows that single-family housing is making solid progress,” said NAHB Chairman Tom Woods. “However, our members continue to tell us that they are concerned about the availability of lots and labor.”
“NAHB is projecting about 1.1 million total housing starts this year,” said Chief Economist David Crowe. “Today's report is consistent with our forecast, and barring any unexpected jolts, we expect housing to keep moving forward at a steady, modest rate through the end of the year.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

September 2015 Macro Pulse -- Are U.S. Softwood Lumber Producers About to be “SLAin”?

As most forest-products industry watchers are aware, the nine-year-old Softwood Lumber Agreement (SLA) -- which regulates Canadian softwood lumber exported to the United States -- is slated to expire on October 12, 2015. With the SLA’s quotas and taxes going away, is the U.S. market about to be inundated by cheap Canadian wood surging south? If Business Vancouver is to be believed, “a wall of wood, gift-wrapped in devalued Canadian mill wrap...is accumulating at sawmills, transit yards and rail points inside Canada.” So, is the threat real or just hyperbole?
Click here to find out by reading the rest of the September 2015 Macro Pulse recap.

The Macro Pulse blog is a commentary about recent economic developments affecting the forest products industry. The monthly Macro Pulse newsletter summarizes the previous 30 days of commentary available on this website.

August 2015 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) decreased 0.1% in August (in line with expectations). The gasoline index declined sharply during August and was the main cause of the seasonally adjusted all-items decrease. Other energy indexes were mixed, with the fuel oil index continuing to decline but the indexes for electricity and natural gas increasing. The food index rose 0.2%, with the indexes for eggs (+7.7% MoM; +35.3% YoY) and for fruits and vegetables rising notably.
The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.1% in August, unchanged from July. The index for shelter rose (rent: +0.3% MoM; owners’ equivalent rent: +0.2% MoM), as did the indexes for apparel, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages. However the index for airline fares declined sharply, and the indexes for household furnishings and operations, recreation, and used cars and trucks also decreased, with the indexes for new vehicles and medical care unchanged.
The all items index increased 0.2% for the 12 months ending August, unchanged from the 12 months ending July. The 12-month change in the index for all items less food and energy also remained the same, at 1.8% for the 12 months ending August. The food index rose 1.6% over the last 12 months, while the energy index declined 15.0%.

The seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) was unchanged in August (-0.2% expected), as a 0.4% increase in the index for final demand services offset a 0.6% decrease in prices for final demand goods. The final demand index moved down 0.8% for the 12 months ended in August, the seventh straight year-over-year decline.
Final demand services: The index for final demand services moved up 0.4% in August, the third consecutive rise. Three-quarters of the advance can be traced to a 0.9% increase in the index for final demand trade services. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Almost half of the August advance in the index for final demand services is attributable to margins for apparel, footwear, and accessories retailing (likely related to back-to-school retail staffing), which jumped 7.0%.
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods fell 0.6%, the largest decline since April’s -0.6%. The decrease is mostly attributable to a 3.3% drop in prices for final demand energy (especially -7.7% in the gasoline index). The index for final demand goods less foods and energy moved down 0.2%. Conversely, prices for final demand foods rose 0.3% (especially a 23.2% surge in the eggs index). 
Click image for larger version
The price indexes we track were either unchanged month-over-month in August but all fell on a year-over-year basis. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.