Click image
for larger version
In
its advance (first) estimate of 1Q2019 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of
Economic Analysis (BEA) pegged growth of the U.S. economy at a seasonally
adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +3.18% (2.3% expected),
up 1.01 percentage points (PP) from 4Q2018’s +2.17%.
On
a year-over-year (YoY) basis, which should eliminate any residual seasonality
distortions present in quarter-over-quarter (QoQ) comparisons, GDP in 1Q2019 was
3.21% higher than in 1Q2018; that growth rate was slightly faster (+0.24PP) than
4Q2018’s +2.97% relative to 4Q2017.
All
four groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private
domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX) and government consumption
expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 1Q growth. As for details:
PCE
– Growth in consumer spending decelerated for a third consecutive quarter. Spending
on durable goods contracted (especially for motor vehicles) while spending on
nondurables grew more slowly. Although health care spending jumped, overall consumer
spending on services decelerated.
PDI
– The contribution from private domestic investment increased; however, virtually
all of the boost in PDI came from inventory growth. Also, both residential
construction and nonresidential structures contracted more slowly. A stall in
commercial spending on equipment was the major drag in this category.
NetX
– Growth in exports and a collapse in imports pushed net exports to its highest
contribution since 2Q2018.
GCE
– While federal spending was flat, state and local spending rebounded.
The
BEA’s real final sales of domestic product growth, which excludes the effect of
inventories, rose to +2.53%, up 0.47PP from 4Q2018.
Click image
for larger version
Observations
by Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis
included the following:
--
The fact that imports added +0.58% annualized growth to the headline may be
good for the headline, but it actually reflects softening import prices in the
midst of generally weaker global trade.
--
Ultimately, and despite weaker core spending, the headline number rebounded
into the "Goldilocks" zone of economic growth. We expect that policy
makers will be really proud of this report.
“Unfortunately,
that ‘Goldilocks’ moment was achieved through growing inventories, increased
governmental outlays, crashing import values and materially understated
inflation,” Davis concluded. “The temperature of the porridge might be just
right, but the taste seems a little off.”
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.