What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Wednesday, March 4, 2020

February 2020 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed that U.S. manufacturing barely expanded in February. The PMI registered 50.1%, down 0.8 percentage point (PP) from the January reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. Slumps in imports (-8.7PP) and input prices (-7.4PP), declines in production (-4.0PP) and new orders (-2.2PP), and a surge in slow deliveries (+4.4PP) suggest weakening demand. 
Click image for larger version
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- accelerated (+1.8PP, to 57.3%). New orders (+6.9PP), exports (+5.5PP) and employment (+2.5PP) were the main drivers behind the increase. 
Click image for larger version
Of the industries we track, only Ag & Forestry contracted. Respondent comments included the following:
Construction -- "[The] coronavirus has increased lead times for the critical items."
Real Estate -- "Construction activity appears to be getting off to a good start for 2020."

Relevant commodities:
Priced higher -- Construction contractors and labor (general and construction).
Priced lower – Gasoline, corrugate and natural gas.
Prices mixed -- Crude oil and diesel.
In short supply -- Construction contractors and subcontractors; and labor (general, construction and temporary).

As has become common in recent months, findings of IHS Markit’s February surveys were mixed relative to their ISM counterparts.
Manufacturing -- Manufacturing output growth weakens amid slower upturn in new orders.
Key findings:
* Operating conditions improve at softest pace for six months
* New order growth slows to nine-month low
* Business confidence strongest since April 2019

Services -- Fastest contraction in business activity since October 2013.
Key findings:
* Marginal fall in output as demand conditions weaken
* Slower rise in employment amid reduced pressure on capacity
* Business confidence strengthens, but remains relatively muted

Commentary by Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist:
Manufacturing -- "Manufacturing production and order book trends deteriorated markedly in February as producers struggled against the double headwinds of falling export sales and supply chain delays, both in turn often linked to the coronavirus outbreak.
“Any growth in sales was once again largely driven by domestic consumers, though even here the rate of growth was weakened considerably compared to late last year.
“Historical comparisons against official data indicate that the survey is consistent with factory production and orders both falling at annualized rates of around 3%, with manufacturing jobs being lost at a monthly rate of roughly 20,000.
“While trade war fears have eased, helping push firms’ expectations for future growth to the highest since last April, coronavirus-related supply chain issues threaten to constrain production in coming months. At the same time, companies have become increasingly concerned that the COVID-19 outbreak will also hit demand, which is reportedly already cooling amid uncertainly leading up to the presidential election. Recent stock market volatility could also further dampen consumer spending and deter business investment.”

Services -- "The U.S. service sector took a knock from the coronavirus outbreak and growing uncertainty about the economic and political outlooks in February. The fall in the headline index measuring business activity levels was the second largest seen since the global financial crisis over a decade ago, exceeded only by the brief slump in activity during the 2013 government shutdown.
“Combined with a weak manufacturing survey in February, the data are consistent with annualized GDP growth slipping from around 2% at the start of the year to just 0.7% midway through the first quarter.
“Business sectors such as travel and tourism are reporting weakened activity due to the virus outbreak, most notably in terms of foreign visitors and overseas sales. However, other sectors such as financial services and business services are reporting virus-related hits to demand, suggesting a more broad-based weakening of demand across the economy, exacerbating the supply-shock that is constraining manufacturing.
“Companies have meanwhile grown increasingly concerned about client spending and investment being curbed ahead of the presidential election. Political and economic uncertainty, the coronavirus outbreak and financial market turmoil all risk building into a cocktail of risk aversion that has severely heightened downside risks to the economy in coming months. Much will depend of course on the speed with which the virus can be contained and how quickly business can return to normal.”

Commenting on the J.P.Morgan Global Composite PMI, Olya Borichevska, from Global Economic Research at J.P.Morgan, said:
“The outbreak of COVID-19 disrupted global economic activity in February, with output and new business falling [by] the greatest extents since mid-2009. However, a lot of this owes to China where the composite PMI fell 24PP as rates of decline in activity and new orders accelerated to survey records at manufacturers and service providers alike. The rest of the world fell a bit more than two points to near stagnation though we expect further declines as long as the disruptions continue. Business sentiment held up better, staying close to January's nine-month high.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, March 2, 2020

February 2020 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In February the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar (USD) appreciated versus Canada’s “loonie” (+1.5%), the euro (+1.7%) and yen (+0.7%). On the broad trade-weighted index basis (goods and services), the USD gained 1.2% against a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2020 Construction Spending

Click image for larger view
Construction spending during January 2020 was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of $1,369.2 billion, 1.8 percent (±0.8 percent) above the revised December estimate of $1,345.5 billion (originally $1,327.7 billion); consensus expectations were for +0.6%. The January figure is 6.8 percent (±1.3 percent) above the January 2019 SAAR of $1,282.5 billion; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table below) was +6.9%.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The U.S. Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
Private Construction
Spending on private construction was at a SAAR of $1,022.7 billion, 1.5 percent (±0.7 percent) above the revised December estimate of $1,007.6 billion (originally $991.2 billion):
- Residential: $554.8 billion, +2.1 percent (±1.3 percent);
- Nonresidential: $468.0 billion, +0.8 percent (±0.7 percent).
Public Construction
Public construction spending was $346.5 billion, 2.6 percent (±1.5 percent) above the revised December estimate of $337.8 billion (originally $336.4 billion):
- Educational: $81.5 billion, +0.7 percent (±1.8 percent)*;
- Highway: $103.9 billion, +5.4 percent (±4.6 percent). 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of January’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 27, 2020

4Q2019 Gross Domestic Product: Second Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its second estimate of 4Q2019 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) bumped the growth rate of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +2.10% (2.1% expected), up 0.02 percentage point (PP) from the “advance” estimate (“4Qv1”) but down less than 0.01PP from 3Q2019.
As with 4Qv1, three of the four GDP component groupings -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), net exports (NetX) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 4Q growth; private domestic investment (PDI) detracted from it.
This report contained no material changes, and the revisions can be regarded as statistical noise. As for details:
·     PCE. A 0.12PP decrease in good purchases was partially offset by a 0.09PP increase in spending on services.
·     PDI. A 0.10PP decline in fixed investment was more than offset by a 0.11PP increase in inventories.
·     NetX. A 0.07PP increase in exports was partially offset by a 0.03PP decrease in imports.
·     GCE. A 0.02PP increase in federal spending was essentially offset by a decline in state and local government spending
The BEA's real final sales of domestic product was revised modestly downward (-0.08PP, to +3.08%), which is 0.94PP above the 3Q estimate. 
Click image for larger version
Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis summarized the key points of this report as follows:
-- There were no reported material changes in a report that can be characterized as statistical noise.
-- Both consumer spending and commercial investments are weak.
-- The headline number is boosted by questionable inflationary assumptions and the BEA's logic for dealing with reduced imports (largely from China).
-- The quarter in question was one of high political theater/drama, which can explain a significant amount of the tepid consumer spending.
“We probably do not need to note that all of this reporting is for a quarter before the widespread impact of the new corona virus,” Davis added. “It could be argued that U.S. economic growth had already topped by 4Q2019, making it more vulnerable than usual to any sort of ‘Black Swan.’ And a Black Swan is exactly what we now see flying out of China.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

January 2020 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in January 2020 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 764,000 units (708,000 expected). This is 7.9% (±17.8%)* above the revised December rate of 708,000 (originally 694,000) and 18.6% (±19.2%)* above the January 2019 SAAR of 644,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted (NSA) year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +16.3%. For longer-term perspectives, NSA sales were 45.0% below the “housing bubble” peak and 9.0% below the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The median sales price of new houses sold in January jumped ($24,100 or +7.4% MoM) to a record $348,300; meanwhile, the average sales price increased to $402,300 ($29,000 or +7.8%). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 8.8% of the total sold, up from the year-earlier 8.2%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 1.8% of those sold in January, down from 2.0% a year earlier.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in January, single-unit completions decreased by 32,000 units (-3.5%). Although sales rose (56,000 units; +7.9%) while completions fell, inventory for sale expanded in absolute terms (+1,000 units) but contracted in months-of-inventory (-0.4 month) terms. 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales retreated in January (70,000 units or -1.3%), to a SAAR of 5.46 million units. Inventory of existing homes for sale expanded in both absolute (+30,000 units) and months-of-inventory (+0.1 month) terms. Because new-home sales rose while resales fell, the share of total sales comprised of new homes advanced to 12.3%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in January decreased to $266,300 ($8,200 or -3.0% MoM). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability deteriorated (+1.9 percentage points) as the median price of existing homes for sale in December rose by $2,900 (+1.1%; +8.0 YoY), to $277,000. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices inched up at a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.1% (+3.8% YoY).
"The U.S. housing market continued its trend of stable growth in December,” said Craig Lazzara, Managing Director and Global Head of Index Investment Strategy at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “December’s results bring the National Composite Index to a 3.8% increase for calendar 2019. This marks eight consecutive years of increasing housing prices (an increase which is echoed in our 10- and 20-City Composites). At the national level, home prices are 59% above the trough reached in February 2012, and 15% above their pre-financial crisis peak. Results for 2019 were broad-based, with gains in every city in our 20-City Composite.
“At a regional level, Phoenix retains the top spot for the seventh consecutive month, with a gain of 6.5% for December. Charlotte and Tampa rose by 5.3% and 5.2% respectively, leading the Southeast region. The Southeast has led all regions for the past year.
“As was the case last month, after a long period of decelerating price increases, the National, 10-City, and 20-City Composites all rose at a faster rate in December than they had done in November; 12 of our 20 cities likewise saw accelerating prices. It is, of course, too soon to say whether this marks an end to the deceleration or is merely a pause in the longer-term trend.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

January 2020 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in January at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,567,000 units (1.420 million expected). This is 3.6 percent (±13.3 percent)* below the revised December estimate of 1,626,000 (originally 1.608 million units), but 21.4 percent (±12.2 percent) above the January 2019 SAAR of 1,291,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was +25.4%.
Single-family housing starts in January were at a SAAR of 1,010,000; this is 5.9 percent (±11.6 percent)* below the revised December figure of 1,073,000 units (+7.0% YoY). Multi-family starts: 557,000 units (+0.7% MoM; +76.9% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total completions were at a SAAR of 1,280,000 units. This is 3.3 percent (±8.4 percent)* below the revised December estimate of 1,323,000 (originally 1.277 million units), but 1.5 percent (±11.7 percent)* above the January 2019 SAAR of 1,261,000 units; the NSA comparison: +1.7% YoY.
Single-family completions were at a rate of 877,000; this is 3.5 percent (±6.8 percent)* below the revised December rate of 909,000 units (-5.3% YoY). Multi-family completions: 403,000 units (-2.7% MoM; +21.3% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits amounted to a SAAR of 1,551,000 units (1.458 million expected). This is 9.2 percent (±2.1 percent) above the revised December rate of 1,420,000 (originally 1.474 million units) and 17.9 percent (±1.3 percent) above the January 2019 SAAR of 1,316,000 units; the NSA comparison: +19.7% YoY.
Single-family permits were at a SAAR of 987,000; this is 6.4 percent (±2.5 percent) above the revised December figure of 928,000 units (+21.2% YoY). Multi-family: 564,000 (+14.6% MoM; +17.4% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes edged one point lower to 74 in February, according to the latest NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) released today. The last three monthly readings mark the highest sentiment levels since December 2017.
“Steady job growth, rising wages and low interest rates are fueling demand but builders are still grappling with increasing construction and development costs,” said NAHB Chairman Dean Mon.
“At a time when demand is on the rise, regulatory constraints along with a shortage of construction workers and a dearth of lots are hindering the production of affordable housing in local communities across the nation,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “And while lower mortgage rates have improved housing affordability in recent months, accelerating price growth due to limited inventory may offset some of that effect.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2020 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) rose 0.1% in January (+0.2% expected) after rising 0.2% in December. The index for shelter accounted for the largest part of the increase in the seasonally adjusted all items index, with the indexes for food and for medical care services also rising. These increases more than offset a decrease in the gasoline index, which fell 1.6% in January. The energy index declined 0.7%, and the major energy component indexes were mixed. The index for food rose 0.2% in January with the indexes for both food at home and food away from home increasing over the month.
The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2% in January after increasing 0.1% in December. Along with the indexes for shelter and medical care, the indexes for apparel, recreation, education, and airline fares all increased in January. The indexes for used cars and trucks, prescription drugs, motor vehicle insurance, and household furnishings and operations were among those to decline.
The all items index increased 2.5% for the 12 months ending January, the largest 12-month increase since the period ending October 2018. The index for all items less food and energy rose 2.3% over the last 12 months, the same 12-month increase as reported in the previous 3 months. The food index rose 1.8% over the last 12 months, while the energy index increased 6.2% over that period.

The Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI-FD) advanced 0.5% in January (+0.2% expected). Final demand prices rose 0.2% in December and declined 0.1% in November. In January, 90% of the increase in the final demand index is attributable to prices for final demand services, which climbed 0.7%. The index for final demand goods inched up 0.1%.
On an unadjusted basis, the final demand index increased 2.1% for the 12 months ended in January, the largest advance since moving up 2.1% for the 12 months ended May 2019. Prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services advanced 0.4% in January, the largest increase since a 0.4% rise in April 2019. For the 12 months ended in January, the index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services moved up 1.5%.
Final Demand
Final demand services: The index for final demand services climbed 0.7% in January, the largest increase since rising 0.7% in October 2018. In January, margins for final demand trade services advanced 1.2%, and prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing moved up 0.6%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) In contrast, the index for final demand transportation and warehousing services fell 1.6%.
Product detail: Forty percent of the January increase in the index for final demand services can be traced to margins for apparel, jewelry, footwear, and accessories retailing, which jumped 10.3%. The indexes for machinery and vehicle wholesaling; health, beauty, and optical goods retailing; inpatient care; guestroom rental; and portfolio management also moved higher. Conversely, prices for airline passenger services decreased 5.8%. The indexes for professional and commercial equipment wholesaling and for wireless telecommunication services also declined.
Final demand goods: Prices for final demand goods inched up 0.1% in January, the fourth consecutive rise. Leading the January increase, the index for final demand goods less foods and energy climbed 0.3%. Prices for final demand foods advanced 0.2%. In contrast, the index for final demand energy fell 0.7%.
Product detail: A 13.9% rise for prices of iron and steel scrap was a major factor in the January advance in the index for final demand goods. Prices for fresh and dry vegetables; jet fuel; search, detection, navigation, and guidance systems and equipment; and grains also moved higher. Conversely, the gasoline index decreased 1.5%. Prices for chicken eggs, diesel fuel, and motor vehicles also declined. 
Click image for larger version
The not-seasonally adjusted price indexes we track were mixed on both MoM and YoY bases. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.