What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Saturday, May 30, 2015

1Q2015 Gross Domestic Product: Second (Preliminary) Estimate

Click image for larger version
The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) revised 1Q2015 growth in real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) down a full percentage point, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of -0.75% -- well below the already anemic “advance” estimate of +0.25% issued last month. Analysts had expected a revision to -0.8% (ranging from -1.0 to -0.2%). Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and private domestic investment (PDI) contributed to 1Q growth, while net exports (NetX) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) subtracted from it. 
Click image for larger version
Details on 1Q revisions:
Positives –
  • Consumer spending on goods improved a “smidgen” to +0.10% annualized growth;
  • Fixed commercial investment also improved -- although only to a "less bad" contraction rate of -0.21% (from -0.40% in the advance report).

Negatives –
  • Imports subtracted an additional -0.58% from the headline number;
  • Exports declined -0.07%;
  • Inventory growth was weaker by -0.41%;
  • Consumer spending on services dropped -0.13%; and
  • Government spending was -0.05% lower.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, May 28, 2015

April 2015 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family homes edged up in April, rising by 33,000 units (+6.8%) relative to the previous month, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 517,000 (slightly above the 509,000 expected). Sales had been essentially flat (averaging 427,000 units) from January 2013 through 1H2014; February 2015’s 538,000 units (SAAR) has so far not been surpassed. Sales in April were 25.6% above year-earlier levels; year-to-date (YTD), sales were 21.9% above the same months in 2014.
Meanwhile, the median price of new homes sold jumped by $11,800 (+4.1%) to $297,300. The average price of homes sold retreated by $1,800 (-0.5%). Because single-family starts increased more quickly than sales, the three-month average ratio of starts to sales nudged up to 1.28; that level is significantly below the average (1.41) since January 1995. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post on April’s housing permits, starts and completions, single-unit completions increased by 87,000 units (+14.5%). The rise in both sales and completions resulted in new-home inventory expanding in absolute terms (+1,000 units) but months of inventory shrinking (-0.3 months). 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales retreated in April (-170,000 units or 3.3%) to 5.04 million units (SAAR); that result was below even the low end of Bloomberg’s consensus range of expectations (5.10 to 5.32 million). Because sales of existing homes fell while new homes increased, the share of total sales comprised of new homes bumped up to 9.3%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in April rose by $8,700 (+4.1%) to $219,400. Inventory of existing homes expanded in both absolute (+200,000 units) and months-of-inventory terms (+0.7 months). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability suffered in March, as the median price of existing homes for sale rose by $10,000 (+4.9%) to $213,500. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.8% in March (+4.1% relative to a year earlier).
“Home prices have enjoyed year-over-year gains for 35 consecutive months,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee for S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The pattern of consistent gains is national and seen across all 20 cities covered by the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices. The longest run of gains is in Detroit at 45 months, the shortest is New York with 27 months. However, the pace has moderated in the last year; from August 2013 to February 2014, the national index gained more than 10% year-over-year, compared to 4.1% in this release.
“Given the long stretch of strong reports, it is no surprise that people are asking if we’re in a new home price bubble. The only way you can be sure of a bubble is looking back after it’s over. The average 12 month rise in inflation adjusted home prices since 1975 is about 1.0% per year compared to the current 4.1% pace, arguing for a bubble. However, the annual rate of increase halved in the last year, as shown in the first chart. Home prices are currently rising more quickly than either per capita personal income (3.1%) or wages (2.2%), narrowing the pool of future home-buyers. All of this suggests that some future moderation in home prices gains is likely. Moreover, consumer debt levels seem to be manageable. I would describe this as a rebound in home prices, not bubble and not a reason to be fearful.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, May 22, 2015

April 2015 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1% in April (in line with expectations). The “core” index (all-items less food and energy) rose 0.3% in April and led to the slight increase in the seasonally adjusted all-items index. The index for shelter rose, as did the indexes for medical care (+0.7% -- the biggest increase since January 2007), household furnishings and operations, used cars and trucks, and new vehicles. In contrast, the indexes for apparel and airline fares declined in April.
The energy index declined in April, while the food index was unchanged. The indexes for gasoline, natural gas, and fuel oil all declined, while the electricity index was unchanged. The food at home index declined for the second month in a row, offsetting an increase in the index for food away from home. Major grocery store food group indexes were mixed.
The all-items index declined 0.2% for the 12 months ending April. This represented a slightly larger decrease than the 0.1% decline for the 12 months ending March. The decline was driven by the energy index, which fell 19.4% over the last 12 months, with all the major components declining except electricity (+3.8% YoY). The food index rose 2.0% over the last year, and the index for all items less food and energy rose 1.8%.
The seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) fell 0.4% in April (+0.2% expected). This was on the heels of +0.2% in March and -0.5% in February. In April, more than 70% of the decrease in final demand prices can be attributed to a 0.7% decline in the index for final demand goods. Prices for final demand services edged down 0.1%.
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods moved down 0.7% in April following a 0.3% rise in March. Leading the broad-based decline, prices for final demand energy fell 2.9%. The indexes for final demand foods and for final demand goods less foods and energy decreased 0.9% and 0.1%, respectively.
Product detail:  Over 30% of the April decline in prices for final demand goods can be attributed to the index for gasoline, which decreased 4.7%. Prices for diesel fuel, jet fuel, utility natural gas, pork, and industrial chemicals also moved lower. In contrast, the index for pharmaceutical preparations advanced 0.5%. Prices for fresh and dry vegetables and for raw cotton also moved up.
Final demand services:  The index for final demand services edged down 0.1% in April after inching up 0.1% in March. Leading the decrease, margins for final demand trade services fell 0.8%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) The index for final demand transportation and warehousing services declined 0.1%. Conversely, prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing rose 0.2%. 
Product detail:  Over 40% of the April decrease in the index for final demand services can be traced to margins for machinery and equipment wholesaling, which declined 1.0%. The indexes for automotive fuels and lubricants retailing; health, beauty, and optical goods retailing; portfolio management; and food and alcohol retailing also moved lower. In contrast, prices for securities brokerage, dealing, investment advice, and related services climbed 4.0%. The indexes for food wholesaling, inpatient care, and passenger car rental also advanced. 
Click image for larger version
The price indexes we track were mixed on both month-over-month and year-over-year bases in March. Only Lumber & Wood Products did not decrease from March to April. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

April 2015 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing starts rocketed higher in April, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 1.135 million units (1.029 million expected). That level was 191,000 units higher (+20.2%) than March’s 944,000 units (revised up from the original 926,000), the second-largest jump in the data series. The increase in total starts was split as follows -- single-family: +105,000 units (16.7%); multi-family: +86,000 units (27.2%). 
Click image for larger view
The year-over-year percentage change in total starts bounced “back into the black” in April (+9.2%). Single-family starts were 13.8% above their year-earlier level, while the multi-family component nudged up to +0.9%. Not-seasonally adjusted year-to-date (YTD) comparisons to 2014 improved in all but the multi-family component relative to April’s results. We would observe, however, that the annual (i.e., year-over-year) percentage change in total starts has not yet broken off its downward trend present since 2013. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions also jumped, rising by 167,000 units (+20.4%) in April, to 986,000 units SAAR. The increase was about evenly split -- single-family: +87,000 units (14.5%); multi-family: +80,000 units (36.7%). As was the case with starts, YTD completions are positive relative to 2014, and rose “across the board” relative to April’s results. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits rounded out the positives in April when increasing by 105,000 units (+10.1%), to 1.143 million SAAR (1.070 million expected). The multi-family component dominated in April: +81,000 units (20.5%); single-family: +24,000 units (3.7%). YTD total permits were 5.4% above the same months in 2014; except for the multi-family component, permits were higher than April’s results.
Despite the apparent increase in residential construction activity, the latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) dipped by two points in May (to 54). An index value above 50 means more builders feel the market is good than feel it is poor. “Despite this month’s slight dip, builder confidence in the new home market remains above the 50-point benchmark,” said NAHB Chair Tom Woods. “Overall, the second quarter of 2015 is shaping up to be very solid.”
“Consumers are exhibiting caution, and want to be on more stable financial footing before purchasing a home,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “On the bright side, the HMI component measuring future sales expectations has been tracking upward all year, mortgage rates remain low, and house prices are affordable. These factors should spur the release of pent-up demand moving forward.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Saturday, May 16, 2015

April 2015 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) decreased 0.3% (0.0% expected) in April for its fifth consecutive monthly loss. Manufacturing output was unchanged in April after recording an upwardly revised gain of 0.3% in March. In April, the index for mining moved down 0.8%, its fourth consecutive monthly decrease; a sharp fall in oil and gas well drilling has more than accounted for the overall decline in mining this year. The output of utilities fell 1.3% in April. At 105.2% of its 2007 average, total IP in April was 1.9% above its year-earlier level. Wood Products and Paper output rose, respectively, by 1.3% and 0.2%. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector decreased 0.4 percentage point in April to 78.2%, a rate that is 1.9 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2014) average. Wood Products and Paper CU both bucked the larger trend by rising, respectively, +0.9% (to 69.2%) and +0.4% (to 83.6%). 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries and manufacturing levels moved higher: +0.2% (to 134.5% of 2007 output) and +0.1% (to 132.6%), respectively. Wood Products extended its ongoing upward trend (since July 2013) when increasing by 0.3% (to 118.4%). Paper, by contrast, contracted by 0.1% to another new low (98.5%). Paper capacity was 2.4% lower in April than a year earlier.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, May 8, 2015

April 2015 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment increased by 223,000 jobs in April -- in line with expectations of 220,000. However, combined February and March employment gains were revised downward by 39,000 (March was cut from +126,000 to +85,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) ticked down to 5.4% -- more a result of workers finding jobs (192,000) than individuals dropping out of the workforce (19,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment report include:
The disparity in jobs gains between the establishment (+233,000) and household (+192,000) surveys was less pronounced in April.
The downturn in oil-sector (part of the Mining & Logging category) employment continued in this report, although the BLS said employment in oil and gas extraction fell by 3,000. Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that nearly 21,000 oil-sector job cuts were announced in April, although it is doubtful all of those workers were actually terminated in April.
Nearly 66% (140,000) of private-sector job growth occurred in the three super-sectors typically associated with the lowest-paid jobs: Profession & Business Services; Education & Health Services, and Leisure & Hospitality.
The ongoing narrowing in the number of Manufacturing versus Food Service & Drinking Places (FS&DP) jobs continued in March. Interestingly, in January 2000, there were 9.168 million more U.S. manufacturing jobs than FS&DP jobs. As of April 2015, the gap has shrunk to 1.301 million. Although the number of manufacturing jobs was 180,000 higher than April 2014, the concurrent growth rate in FS&DP jobs was more than double that (+387,000). 
Click image for larger view
The employment-population ratio was stable at 59.3% for a fourth month, but the number of employment-age persons not in the labor force rose by 19,000 to a new record near 93.2 million. 
Click image for larger view
The labor force participation rate ticked higher by 0.1 percentage point, to 62.8%; the LFPR has been tightly range-bound around an average of 62.8% since April 2014. Average hourly earnings of all private employees rose up by $0.03, resulting in a 2.2% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages rose $0.02 (+1.9% YoY). With the CPI running at an official rate of -0.1% (YoY), wages are technically rising in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. The amount of time people worked each week, meanwhile, remained at 34.5 hours. 
Click image for larger view
Finally, full-time jobs decreased (-252,000) while part-time jobs jumped (+437,000). Full-time jobs have been trending higher since December 2009, but are still 1.1 million short of the pre-recession high. Part-time jobs, by contrast, have been stuck in a channel between roughly 27 and 28 million.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

April 2015 ISM and Markit Reports

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly opinion survey showed that growth of economic activity in the U.S. manufacturing sector was unchanged in April. The PMI registered 51.5%, the same reading as in March -- its lowest reading since May 2013. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. The most apparent changes included increases in the new orders, exports and imports sub-indexes, and contraction in employment. 
Click image for larger version
Wood Products expanded in April, thanks entirely to new and backlogged orders. Paper Products also expanded, with support among new and backlogged orders, production, and exports.
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- quickened in April. The NMI registered 57.8%, 1.3 percentage points above the March reading 56.5%. The business activity sub-index rose noticeably, and new orders slightly less so. However, exports contracted (collapsing from 59 to 48.5) and import growth markedly slowed. “The majority of respondents indicate that there has been an uptick in business activity due to the improved economic climate and prevailing stability in business conditions.” said Anthony Nieves, chair of ISM’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. 
Click image for larger version
All three service industries we track reported expansion in April. The new orders sub-index was once again the most consistent source of strength.
The only relevant commodity up in price was paper. Oil was down in price. Some reported fuel (both gasoline and diesel) as cheaper, others as more expensive. No relevant commodities were in short supply.
ISM’s and Markit’s surveys exhibited some divergence in April. Both Markit’s Manufacturing and Services PMIs reflected some moderation in the rate of growth.
Comments from Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief economist, are presented below:
Manufacturing -- “With manufacturing output growth slowing to the weakest seen so far this year and exports falling for the first time since November, the survey results raise worries that the dollar’s appreciation is hurting the economy.
“The slowing in the economy is accompanied by a renewed weakening of price pressures, linked to the exchange rate bringing down the cost of imports. Input prices showed one of the steepest falls seen since the recession, a cost-saving which producers often passed on to customers. Prices charged rose at the slowest rate seen for almost three years.
“The weakening growth trend and fall in price pressures add to a growing clutch of disappointing numbers which suggest the Fed will err on the side of caution and hold off from rate hikes until a clearer picture emerges of the economy’s health. Any policy tightening therefore looks likely to be deferred until at least September, but the fact that both manufacturing and services continue to grow at reasonably robust rates at the start of the second quarter suggest that rate hikes towards the end of the year should not be ruled out.”

Services -- “Robust service sector growth adds to evidence that the economy is far from stalling, as indicated by the GDP numbers seen at the start of the year, supporting the Fed’s view of the economy growing at a ‘moderate’ rate.
“Together with the expansion signaled by the manufacturing survey, the service sector PMI so far points to the economy growing at an annualized rate of 3% in the second quarter, representing a nice rebound from the first quarter’s soft-patch.
“Hiring has also remained resilient, boding well for monthly non-farm payroll growth to return above 200,000.
“Price pressures have also ticked higher, suggesting we may see some further upwards pressure on core inflation in coming months.
“The robust growth and hiring, as well as the upturn in prices, keeps alive the possibility of the Fed hiking rates later this year, perhaps as early as September if the data flow impresses in coming months.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, May 4, 2015

April 2015 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil edged up off its lowest price in six years, rising $5.97 to $53.79 per barrel in April. The price bump coincided with a weakening U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 147,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) increase in the amount of oil supplied/demanded in February (to 19.4 million BPD), and a seemingly unstoppable accumulation of crude oil stocks (to the highest levels in about 80 years). The monthly average price spread between Brent crude (the predominant grade used in Europe) and WTI narrowed by $3.00 in April, to $5.07 per barrel. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
With futures prices in “contango” (i.e., near-term contracts are priced lower than later-term contracts), we do not expect significant additional fallout in spot oil prices. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2015 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In April the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar depreciated against two of the three major currencies we track: -2.2% against Canada’s loonie and -0.7% against the yen. The greenback was stable relative to the euro. On a trade-weighted index basis, the dollar weakened by 1.0% against a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

March 2015 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments increased $2.3 billion or 0.5% to $482.2 billion in March. Shipments of durable goods increased $2.9 billion or 1.2% to $246.9 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments decreased $0.6 billion or 0.3% to $235.3 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Wood shipments fell by 2.0% while Paper rose 0.2%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories decreased $1.1 billion or 0.2% to $649.1 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.35, unchanged from February.
Inventories of durable goods increased $0.3 billion or 0.1% to $413.1 billion (the highest level since the series was first published on a NAICS basis in 1992), led by computers and electronic products. Nondurable goods inventories decreased $1.5 billion or 0.6% to $236.1 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of Wood edged up by 0.1% while Paper contracted 0.3%. 
Click image for larger view
New orders increased $9.6 billion or 2.1% to $476.5 billion (in line with expectations). Excluding transportation, new orders increased 0.3%. Durable goods orders increased $10.2 billion or 4.4% to $241.2 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for nondurable goods decreased $0.6 billion or 0.3% to $235.3 billion.
Prior to July 2014, as can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders had been essentially flat since early 2012, recouping roughly 75% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. With July’s transportation-led spike now in the rearview mirror, new orders are back to around 61% of their December 2007 high. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders $1.0 billion or 0.1% to $1,157.3 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.67, down from 6.70 in February. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to just 79% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders, hence, this metric is likely to remain elevated for several years.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, May 1, 2015

March 2015 Construction Spending

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Overall construction spending in the United States fell 0.6% during March (+0.4% expected), to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of $966.6 billion. Private construction spending dropped by 0.3%. Outlays on residential projects shrank by 1.6% while non-residential expanded by 1.0%. Spending on public construction projects decreased 1.5%. 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of March’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

1Q2015 Gross Domestic Product: First (Advance) Estimate

Click image for larger version
According to the “advance” estimate by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), 1Q2015 growth in real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) was pegged at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of 0.2% -- down roughly 2.0 percentage points from the 4Q2014’s final 2.2% estimate. Analysts had expected 1.0% (ranging from +0.2 to 2.4%). Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and private domestic investment (PDI) contributed to 1Q growth, while net exports (NetX) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) subtracted from it.
Negatives:
* Consumer spending for goods grew at a 0.05% annualized rate, down from 4Q’s +1.07%.
* Consumer spending for services grew at 1.26% (the majority in non-discretionary healthcare, housing and utilities), down from 4Q’s +1.91%.
* Fixed investment contracted (-0.40%), down from 4Q’s +0.72%.
* Exports shrank at a -0.96% annualized rate, down from 4Q’s +0.59%, thanks in large part to a strong dollar.
Positives:
* Inventory growth contributed +0.74% to the headline number, up from 4Q’s -0.10%.
* Imports subtracted less from the headline number (-0.29%, compared with 4Q’s -1.62%).
* Government spending contracted at a slower (-0.15%) annualized rate, thereby boosting the headline number by +0.20%. 
Click image for larger version
Perhaps the item most worthy of note is that without the record buildup of inventories (+$121.9 billion in nominal dollars), 1Q GDP would have been -2.6% instead of the reported 0.2%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.