What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Tuesday, May 30, 2017

April 2017 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in April 2017 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 569,000 units (604,000 expected). This is 11.4 percent (±10.5 percent) below the revised March rate of 642,000 (originally 621,000), but is 0.5 percent (±11.3 percent)* above the April 2016 SAAR of 566,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was -1.8%. For a longer-term perspective, April sales were 59.0% below the “bubble” peak but 3.3% above the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The median sales price of new houses sold in April 2017 was $309,200 (-$9,500 or 3.0%). The average sales price was $368,300 (-$17,100 or 4.4%). Starter homes (those priced below $200,000) comprised 11.1% of the total sold, down from April 2016’s 18.2%, and a new record low for the month of April (since 2002); prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 1.9% of those sold in April, also a new record low for that month of the year.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in April, single-unit completions fell by 37,000 units (-4.5%). Since the decrease in sales outpaced that of completions, new-home inventory expanded in both absolute (+4,000 units) and months-of-inventory (+0.8 month) terms. 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales dropped by 130,000 units (-2.3%) in March, to a SAAR of 5.570 million units (5.650 million expected). Inventory of existing homes expanded in both absolute (+130,000 units) and months-of-inventory (+0.4 month) terms. With new-home sales decreasing at a proportionately faster rate than existing-home sales, the share of total sales comprised of new homes fell back to 9.3%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in April increased by $8,200 (+3.5%), to $244,800. 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability retreated for a fifth month as the median price of existing homes for sale in March jumped by $8,000 (+3.5%; +6.6 YoY), to $237,800. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.8% (+5.8% YoY) -- marking the fourth consecutive all-time high for the index.
“Home prices continue rising with the S&P Corelogic Case-Shiller National Index up 5.8% in the year ended March, the fastest pace in almost three years,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “While there is some regional variation, prices are rising across the United States. Half of the 20 cities tracked by the S&P Corelogic Case-Shiller indices rose more than 6% from March 2016 to March 2017. The smallest gain of 4.1%, in New York, was roughly double the rate of inflation.
“Sales of both new and existing homes, housing starts and the National Association of Home Builders’ sentiment index are all trending higher. Over the last year, analysts suggested that one factor pushing prices higher was the unusually low inventory of homes for sale. People are staying in their homes longer rather than selling and trading up. If mortgage rates, currently near 4%, rise further, this could deter more people from selling and keep pressure on inventories and prices. While prices cannot rise indefinitely, there is no way to tell when rising prices and mortgage rates will force a slowdown in housing.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, May 26, 2017

1Q2017 Gross Domestic Product: Second Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its second estimate of 1Q2017 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) lifted the growth rate of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +1.16% (well above consensus expectations of 0.8%); that is up by 0.47 percentage point from the previous 1Q2017 estimate, but still barely more than half (-0.92 percentage point) 4Q2016’s +2.08%.
Three of the four groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private domestic investment (PDI), and net exports (NetX) -- contributed to 1Q growth. Government consumption expenditures (GCE) detracted from it. Additional details follow:
* Consumer spending grew at a meager 0.44% annualized rate, up 0.21 percentage point from the previous 1Q estimate but still down a significant 1.96% from 4Q2016. Strangely, nearly one-fourth of the gross positive revision (nominal dollars) were attributable to one line item: “Receipts from sales of goods and services by nonprofit institutions serving households” (e.g., churches and religious societies, sports and other clubs, trade unions and political parties). In fact, the upward revision to that line item ($13.6 billion) more than offset the downward revision to spending on healthcare services (-$12.0 billion).
* The previously reported near stall-out in inventory accumulations worsened slightly, to a -1.07% annual pace (a swing of -2.08% from 4Q2016).
* Although government spending was revised upward by 0.10 percentage point, it still contracted during 1Q, removing -0.20% from the headline.
* The good news continued to be commercial fixed investment, which was revised upward by +0.23% and is now adding +1.85% to the headline.
* Foreign trade was also revised upward slightly (+0.07%) to a +0.14% contribution to the headline number, up some +1.96% from 4Q2016.
* Real final sales of domestic product, the BEA's "bottom line" economic indicator that excludes the influence of inventories, was more than a full percent better than the headline at +2.23%, up 1.16% from 4Q2016’s +1.07% rate. 
Click image for larger version
“If the U.S. economy is consumer driven,” wrote Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis, “that driver appears to be seriously distracted. Normally U.S. consumer fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) is strictly a pre-election phenomenon. This time around FUD seems to have lingered far longer than normal.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

April 2017 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in April at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,172,000 units (1.256 million expected). That is 2.6% (±8.8%)* below the revised March estimate of 1,203,000 (originally 1.215 million units), but 0.7% (±7.0%)* above the April 2016 SAAR of 1,164,000; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was +0.4%.
Single-family housing starts in April were at a rate of 835,000 units; that is 0.4% (±8.6%)* above the revised March figure of 832,000 and +7.6% YoY. Multi-family starts: 337,000 units (-9.2% MoM; -15.1% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing completions were at a SAAR of 1,106,000 units. That is 8.6% (±10.8%)* below the revised March estimate of 1,210,000, but 15.1% (±12.2%) above the April 2016 SAAR of 961,000; the NSA comparison: +14.1% YoY.
Single-family housing completions were at a SAAR of 784,000; this is 4.5% (±10.6%)* below the revised March rate of 821,000 but +9.2% YoY. Multi-family completions: 322,000 units (-17.2% MoM; +29.1% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total building permits were at a SAAR of 1,229,000 units (1.271 million expected). That is 2.5% (±1.1%) below the revised March rate of 1,260,000 units (originally 1.260 million), but 5.7% (±1.4%) above the April 2016 SAAR of 1,163,000; the NSA comparison: +1.0% YoY.
Single-family authorizations in April were at a rate of 789,000; this is 4.5% (±0.8%) below the revised March figure of 826,000 but +0.9% YoY. Multi-family: 440,000 (+1.4% MoM; +1.2% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes rose two points in May to a level of 70 on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). This is the second highest HMI reading since the Great Recession’s downturn.
“This report shows that builders’ optimism in the housing market is solidifying, even as they deal with higher building material costs and shortages of lots and labor,” said NAHB Chairman Granger MacDonald.
“The HMI measure of future sales conditions reached its highest level since June 2005, a sign of growing consumer confidence in the new home market,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “Especially as existing home inventory remains tight, we can expect increased demand for new construction moving forward.” 
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2017 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) advanced 1.0% in April (+0.4% expected) for its third consecutive monthly increase and its largest gain since February 2014. Manufacturing output rose 1.0% as a result of widespread increases among its major industries. The indexes for mining and utilities posted gains of 1.2% and 0.7%, respectively. At 105.1% of its 2012 average, total industrial production in April was 2.2% above its year-earlier level. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Industry Groups
As with the overall index, the increase of 1.0% for manufacturing output in April (+0.3% expected) was its largest since February 2014. The indexes for durables and for nondurables each advanced 1.0%, while the output of other manufacturing (publishing and logging) moved up 0.7%. The increase in durables was spearheaded by a large advance for motor vehicles and parts (wood products: +0.5%), while the improvement for nondurables was led by gains for food, beverage, and tobacco products, for textile and product mills, for printing and support, and for chemicals (paper products: +0.8%).
After falling 0.4% in March, the output of mining rose 1.2% in April, largely because of pickups in coal mining and in drilling and support activities. The mining index in April was 7.3% higher than its year-earlier level but 11.2% below its peak in December 2014. The output of utilities moved up 0.7%, as warmer-than-normal temperatures boosted air-conditioning usage and electric power generation; the increase in electricity generation was offset somewhat by lower output for gas utilities, as demand for heating slackened. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector increased 0.6 percentage point (+0.9%) in April to 76.7%, a rate that is 3.2 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2016) average.
Manufacturing CU rose 0.7 percentage point (+0.9%) in April to 75.9%, a rate that is 2.5 percentage points below its long-run average. Although durables, nondurables, and other manufacturing (publishing and logging) all recorded substantial increases in utilization (wood products: +0.5%; paper products: +0.9%), their operating rates remained below their respective long-run averages, with the shortfall being the greatest for other manufacturing. Utilization for mining moved up 0.8 percentage point to 83.3% but remained below its long-run average. The operating rate for utilities rose 0.5 percentage point to 76.3%. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries level nudged up 0.1% (+0.7% YoY) to 137.0% of 2012 output. Manufacturing (NAICS basis) inched up +0.1% (+0.9% YoY) to 137.0%. Wood products: +0.0% (+0.5% YoY) to 155.8%; paper products: -0.1% (-2.0% YoY) to 110.3%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, May 15, 2017

May 2017 Macro Pulse -- Canadian Softwood Lumber Import Duties: “Tariff-pocalypse” or Tempest in a Teapot?

On April 25, the Trump administration fired the latest salvo in the long-running softwood lumber dispute between the United States and Canada, handing down its long-awaited decision related to countervailing duties (CVD) on softwood lumber imported from Canada. The tariffs are intended to make U.S. manufacturers more competitive by counteracting the “massive” subsidies Canada’s provincial and federal governments allegedly provide to their domestic manufacturers. Details are available elsewhere (e.g., the Federal Register), but in broad terms, CVDs ranging from 3 to 24% (overall average is roughly 20%) will be imposed on an estimated US$5 billion of Canadian softwood lumber.
Reaction was immediate and predictably varied…. 
Click here to read the rest of the May 2017 Macro Pulse recap.

The Macro Pulse blog is a commentary about recent economic developments affecting the forest products industry. The monthly Macro Pulse newsletter typically summarizes the previous 30 days of commentary available on this website.

Friday, May 12, 2017

April 2017 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2% (as expected) in April. Increases in indexes for shelter (0.3%), energy, tobacco, and food all contributed to the monthly increase in the all items index. The energy index rose 1.1%, with all 3 of its major component indexes rising. The food index rose 0.2%, mostly due to a sharp increase in the index for fresh vegetables.
The all items index rose 2.2% for the 12 months ending April. While a smaller increase than March’s 2.4% YoY rise, this is still a larger rise than the 1.7% average annual increase over the past 10 years. The index for all items less food and energy rose 1.9% over the last 12 months; this compares to a 1.8% average annual increase over the past decade. The energy index rose 9.3% over the last year, while the food index increased 0.5%; rent: +3.8% and medical care services: +3.1%.
The seasonally adjusted producer price index for final demand (PPI) advanced 0.5% in April. Final demand prices edged down 0.1% in March and climbed 0.3% in February. On an unadjusted basis, the final demand index rose 2.5% for the 12 months ended April 2017, the largest increase since moving up 2.8% for the 12 months ended February 2012.
In April, almost two-thirds of the advance in the final demand index is attributable to prices for final demand services, which moved up 0.4%. The index for final demand goods climbed 0.5%.
Prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services increased 0.7% in April. For the 12 months ended in April, the index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services climbed 2.1%.
Final Demand
Final demand services: The index for final demand services moved up 0.4% in April after edging down 0.1% in March. Most of the increase can be traced to prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing, which advanced 0.8%. The index for final demand transportation and warehousing services increased 0.7%. Conversely, margins for final demand trade services moved down 0.3%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)
Product detail: Over a quarter of the April advance in the index for final demand services is attributable to prices for securities brokerage, dealing, investment advice, and related services, which increased 6.6%. The indexes for guestroom rental; loan services (partial); machinery, equipment, parts, and supplies wholesaling; portfolio management; and airline passenger services also moved higher. In contrast, margins for fuels and lubricants retailing dropped 14.6%. The indexes for food and alcohol retailing and for deposit services (partial) also fell.
Final demand goods: Prices for final demand goods increased 0.5% in April following a 0.1% decline in March. Nearly 40% of the broad-based advance can be attributed to the index for final demand goods less foods and energy, which rose 0.3%. The indexes for final demand foods and final demand energy climbed 0.9% and 0.8%, respectively.
Product detail: In April, the index for cigarettes moved up 2.2%. Prices for gasoline, fresh and dry vegetables, fresh fruits and melons, residential natural gas, and pharmaceutical preparations also advanced. Conversely, the index for jet fuel fell 6.1%. Prices for carbon steel scrap and oilseeds also declined. 
Click image for larger version
All of the not-seasonally adjusted price indexes we track either were unchanged or rose on both MoM and YoY bases. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Saturday, May 6, 2017

March 2017 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports increased (+19 MMBF or 14.5%) in March, while imports fell (-5 MMBF or 0.4%). Exports were 15 MMBF (11.2%) above year-earlier levels; imports were 283 MMBF (17.1%) lower. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 298 MMBF (19.5%) smaller. Moreover, the average net export deficit for the 12 months ending March 2017 was 9.9% greater than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above). 
Click image for larger view
North America (of which Mexico: 21.6%; Canada: 19.8%) and Asia (especially China: 14.8%) were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports in March. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were essentially flat (+0.1%) relative to the same months in 2016. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of nearly all (95.3%) softwood lumber imports into the United States. Interestingly, imports from Canada are 15.7% lower YTD than the same months in 2016. Overall, YTD exports were up 1.3% compared to 2016, while imports were down 10.4%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
U.S. softwood lumber export activity through West Coast customs districts represented the largest proportion in March (32.4% of the U.S. total); the Gulf (31.4%) and the Eastern (28.9%) districts followed close behind. However, Seattle maintained a sizeable lead as the most active export district (21.4% of the U.S. total). At the same time, Great Lakes customs districts handled 67.1% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably Duluth, MN (29.2%) -- coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 30.0% of all softwood lumber exports in March, followed by Douglas-fir (16.1%) and treated lumber (13.9%). Southern pine exports were up 6.0% YTD relative to 2016, while Doug-fir exports were down 4.0%; treated: +49.7%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, May 5, 2017

April 2017 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment added 211,000 jobs in April -- above expectations of +185,000. Moreover, combined February and March 2017 employment gains were revised down by 6,000 (February: +13,000; March: -19,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) edged down to 4.4% as growth in the number of employed (+156,000) outpaced that of people (re)entering the labor force (+12,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* We have often been critical of the BLS’s seeming to “plump” the headline numbers with favorable adjustment factors; for April, there is little evidence pointing to such a conclusion. Imputed jobs from the CES (business birth/death model) adjustment were in the top quartile (76th percentile) of the range of values for the month of April since 2000. However, the BLS also applied only an average seasonal adjustment to the base data of any April since 2000.
* Job gains in the household (156,000) and establishment (211,000) surveys were in fairly close agreement for a change. As analyst Steven Hansen often points out, “From a survey control point of view, the common element [between the two surveys] is jobs growth -- and if they do not match, your confidence in either survey is diminished.”
* As for industry details, Manufacturing added 6,000 jobs in April. That result is reasonably consistent with the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which expanded at a slower pace in April. Wood Products employment rose by 200 jobs; Paper and Paper Products: +400. Construction employment advanced by 5,000 -- which mirrors construction employment trends in ISM’s services report.
* Nearly 40% (73,500) of April’s private-sector job growth occurred in the sectors typically associated with the lowest-paid jobs -- Retail Trade: +6,300; Education & Health Services: +41,000; and Leisure & Hospitality: +26,200. This is a persistent issue, as we have repeatedly highlighted: There are nearly 1.4 million fewer manufacturing jobs today than at the start of the Great Recession in December 2007, but almost 2.0 million more Food Services & Drinking Places (i.e., wait staff and bartender) jobs. In fact, Manufacturing has gained 53,000 jobs YTD2016 while FS&D jobs have expanded by 91,200. 
Click image for larger view
* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) jumped up by 162,000 -- to 94.4 million. April’s NILF estimate is within 1.0% of December 2016’s record high. Meanwhile, the employment-population ratio (EPR) increased fractionally to 60.2%; thus, for every five people being added to the population, only three are employed. 
Click image for larger view
* Given the number of labor force (re)entrants, the labor force participation rate (LFPR) ticked down to 62.9% -- comparable to levels seen in the late-1970s. Average hourly earnings of all private employees increased by $0.07, to $26.19, resulting in a 2.6% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages rose by $0.06, to $21.96 (+2.3% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls expanded by six minutes (to 34.4 hours), average weekly earnings increased by $5.02, to $900.94 (+2.5% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of 2.4% in March, workers are barely holding steady in terms of purchasing power. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs jumped by 480,000. In addition, those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- fell by 305,000. There are now over 4.1 million more full-time jobs than the pre-recession high; for perspective, however, the non-institutional, working-age civilian population has risen by nearly 21.4 million). Those holding multiple jobs dropped by 277,000. 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld in April slumped by $44.4 billion, to $190.5 billion (-18.9% MoM and +4.5% YoY). To reduce some of the volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending April was 3.7% above the year-earlier average -- well off the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, May 4, 2017

March 2017 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments decreased $0.5 billion or 0.1% to $478.8 billion in March. Shipments of durable goods increased $0.7 billion or 0.3% to $240.1 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments decreased $1.3 billion or 0.5% to $238.7 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of Wood fell by 0.9% while Paper rose by 1.0%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories decreased $0.1 billion or virtually unchanged to $629.7 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.32, up from 1.31 in February. Inventories of durable goods increased $0.7 billion or 0.2% to $386.0 billion, led by primary metals. Nondurable goods inventories decreased $0.8 billion or 0.3% to $243.7 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of Wood expanded by 0.7% while Paper was unchanged. 
Click image for larger view
New orders increased $0.8 billion or 0.2% to $478.2 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders fell by 0.3% (but +5.7% YoY -- the fifth consecutive month of year-over-year increases). Durable goods orders increased $2.1 billion or 0.9% to $239.4 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for nondurable goods decreased $1.3 billion or 0.5% to $238.7 billion. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- advanced by 0.5% (and +3.5% YoY). Business investment spending contracted on a YoY basis during all but six months since January 2015 (inclusive).
As can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders were essentially flat between early 2012 and mid-2014, recouping on average 70% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. With July 2014’s transportation-led spike an increasingly distant memory, the recovery in new orders is back to just 56% of the ground given up in the Great Recession. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $2.9 billion or 0.3% to $1,119.6 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.52, down from 6.54 in February. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders jumped to 122% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have gradually declined; not only are they back below the December 2008 peak, but they are also diverging farther from the January 2010-to-June 2014 trend-growth line.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

April 2017 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil inched up ($1.73 or 3.5%) in April, to $51.06 per barrel. The increase coincided with a weaker U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 46,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) decline in the amount of oil supplied/demanded in February (to 19.2 million BPD), and a modest downturn in accumulated oil stocks (to 528 million barrels). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Tom Whipple, editor of Peak Oil Review, provided the following overview:
“Moscow says it now has cut production by the pledged 300,000 BPD. However, this cut was from an artificially high base and does not mean very much. Given that the Saudis have cut more than their required share, the 1.8 million BPD OPEC/NOPEC cut seems to be complete for now. Given the increases in oil production elsewhere in the last six months, there seems to be general agreement that the production cut will need to be extended until the end of the year.  Otherwise it will be a failure and oil prices will continue to fall. Some observers are saying that the production cut will need to be continued at least through the first half of 2018. For now, however, it seems that only a six-month extension will be agreed upon at a meeting later this month.
“A few analysts are saying that U.S. shale oil production is likely to increase at a faster pace than the EIA has been estimating. Rystad Energy expects U.S. shale oil output to grow by 100,000 BPD each month for the rest of this year and into 2018 if prices hold around $50-$55 a barrel.  This is considerably higher than the EIA projections that U.S. production will grow by about 29,000 BPD each month in 2017 and 57,000 BPD in 2018.  Should Rystad be closer to the mark, it would wipe out much of the OPEC/NOPEC production cut, forcing prices lower.  Lower prices, of course, would reduce the incentive for U.S. shale oil producers to increase production at the levels Rystad is projecting.  The U.S. oil rig count rose for the 15th straight time last week to 870 rigs or 450 more than at this time last year. The shale oil industry still has a lot of rigs in storage, so it seems likely that the U.S. rig count will continue to increase for a while.
“Looking beyond the current concerns about OPEC vs. U.S. shale oil production is the question of what the world's oil supply will look like in the next decade. Since U.S. shale oil production took off seven or eight years ago, the possibility of an imminent supply crunch or even peak global oil production has been dismissed by most observers.  However, worries about supply shortages due to the large decrease in oil industry capital expenditures again are being voiced by responsible observers. Last week we heard from Saudi Aramco and the International Energy Agency, both of which have voiced similar warnings in the past.  The IEA points out that worldwide only 2.4 billion barrels of new oil reserves were discovered last year and that the number of oil production projects receiving a final investment decision in 2016 was at the lowest since the 1940's.
“For now, major U.S. oil companies are looking at investing more heavily in shale oil where wells cost less than $10 million to drill and frack as opposed to the billions of dollars that large offshore platforms cost. A few outside observers of the shale oil industry are saying that large production increases cannot continue for much more than a few years. The days of spectacular production increases from the Bakken and Eagle Ford shale oil formations seem to be ending; however, the Permian Basin may still have a way to go. U.S. shale gas production in the Marcellus shal seems to be slipping already, undercutting optimism that U.S. shale gas will be powering the world in coming years.
“Global demand for oil is still on the order of 34 billion barrels per year and is likely to keep increasing by 400-500 million barrels each year.  While the subject of derision by many optimists, some form of peak oil still looks likely in the next decade from a combination of lower supplies, higher prices, concerns about climate change, or even new technologies.” 
Click image for larger view
Selected news items from Oilprice.com Editor Tom Kool include the following:
* Lower inventories, higher refining runs…doesn't matter. U.S. refiners processed a record volume of crude oil last week, according to the EIA. With maintenance season over and refiners ramping up to meet summer demand, they are pulling crude oil out of storage. U.S. inventories dropped by 3.6 million barrels, the largest drawdown in quite a while. But that did very little for oil prices, which dropped sharply this week. One reason the data could be a little misleading: gasoline stocks actually jumped much higher, so all that refining is resulting in gasoline heading into storage.
* Goldman: high probability of OPEC extension. Goldman Sachs' head of commodities, Jeff Currie, said that OPEC is likely to extend its deal for another six months. That could result in WTI trading between $55 and $60 for the rest of this year, which is a "substantial upside, given we are trading at roughly $49.50" Currie said on Bloomberg TV.
* IEA: global oil discoveries hit record low. The IEA said on [April 27] that the oil industry discovered a record low amount of oil in 2016, logging just 2.4 billion barrels in new discoveries. Also, the volume of oil given final investment decisions in 2016 amounted to 4.7 billion barrels, the lowest level in 70 years. The result could be a supply shortage towards the end of the decade, the IEA warned. In fact, the IEA has repeatedly warned about the pending shortfall, which would lead to higher prices and much more volatility by 2020. 
* Libyan production restarts. Although there is conflicting news about what is going on in Libya, Reuters reports that several key oil fields in Libya are restarting operations, including the Sharara field that has a capacity of 300,000 BPD. That news could have been a big reason for the 1.6 percent sell off of WTI and Brent on Thursday. To be sure, there were separate reports that the Sharara field remained shut and Libyan production was still at a 7-month low at 490,000 BPD. Needless to say, Libyan production will likely seesaw for the foreseeable future, and conflicting reports will be likely.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2017 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly opinion survey showed that the expansion in U.S. manufacturing decelerated further during April. The PMI registered 54.8%, down 2.4 percentage points from March. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. Six of the sub-indexes had lower values, while four (production, inventories, exports and imports) had higher values. 
Click image for larger version
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- rebounded from March’s drop when rising by 2.3 percentage points, to 57.5%. Seven sub-indexes exhibited higher values, while three (employment, imports, and inventory sentiment) were lower. 
Click image for larger version
Of the industries we track, only Ag & Forestry contracted; Wood Products was unchanged. “Business level increasing,” wrote one Construction respondent. “More project inquiries are being received.”
Relevant commodities --
* Priced higher: Diesel and gasoline; labor (both construction and general); lumber/ corrugate; corrugated boxes; oil.
* Priced lower: None.
* Prices mixed: None.
* In short supply: Labor (both construction and general).

ISM’s and IHS Markit’s surveys were directionally consistent. Both firms exhibited decelerating manufacturing growth; both also showed expansion in services, although Markit’s survey was considerably less upbeat than ISM’s.
Commenting on the data, Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist said:
Manufacturing -- “Manufacturers reported that growth of production and order books have slowed markedly since peaking in January, with April seeing the weakest improvements for seven months.
“The signs of slowing growth are most evident in the domestic consumer sector, but investment goods manufacturers continue to fare well, enjoying stronger capital equipment spending from the energy sector in particular. Exports have also perked up, with April seeing the steepest increase in foreign orders for eight months.
“Price pressures have meanwhile risen to a two-and-a-half year high, which is likely to feed through to final prices paid for goods consumers in coming months.
“A more upbeat picture came from hiring, which picked up in April, as did optimism about business conditions in the year ahead, suggesting firms are expecting order books continuing to improve in coming months.”

Services -- “The final services PMI came in above the earlier flash estimate but remained only marginally higher than March’s six-month low.
“Combined with a weak manufacturing PMI reading, the surveys suggest that business activity is growing at a slower pace than seen over the first quarter as a whole.
“However, a robust rise is likely to be seen in second quarter GDP as the official numbers exhibit greater seasonality than the PMI, with consistently weak first quarters being typically followed by a rebound in subsequent periods. For this very reason, GDP data seemed to signal weaker growth than implied by the PMI in the first quarter of 2017.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.