What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Wednesday, March 28, 2018

4Q2017 Gross Domestic Product: Third Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its third and final estimate of 4Q2017 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported that the U.S. economy was growing at a +2.88% seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (+2.7% expected), up 0.35 percentage point (PP) from the previous estimate (“4Qv2”) but down 0.28PP from 3Q.
Three of the four groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private domestic investment (PDI), and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 4Q growth. Net exports (NetX) detracted from it.
The boost in the headline number resulted from upward revisions to contributions from consumer spending (+0.17PP) and inventories (also +0.17PP, mainly the result of a contraction in inventories that was smaller than previously estimated). No other line items changed materially. Real final sales of domestic product (which excludes inventories) increased to +3.41%, up 0.18PP from 4Qv2 and +1.04PP from 3Q.   
Click image for larger version
Commentary from Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis:
“The boost in the headline number came equally from consumer spending and inventory revisions. The only other material change was the deteriorating household savings rate. The major takeaway from this report is the latter.
“Despite the current happy unemployment numbers, household disposable income and savings rates remain weak. The savings rate (2.6%, down 0.8PP from 3Q and more than -1.0PP from 2Q2017) is lower than the level seen at the brink of the "Great Recession" and disposable income has grown less than 7% in aggregate over the past 10 years.
“As we mentioned last month, the stagnant household income numbers should (in theory) get a boost in 1&2Q2018 from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The withholding changes should have been rolled out during 1Q and will be in effect for the entire 2Q.
“We will be watching closely to see when the improved take-home pay translates into higher consumer spending. It is likely that the spending boost will lag by a quarter or more while household budgets (and savings rates) regain some breathing room.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

February 2018 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in February 2018 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 618,000 units (630,000 expected). This is 0.6% (±13.3%)* below the revised January rate of 622,000 (originally 593,000 units), but is 0.5% (±16.6%)* above the February 2017 SAAR of 615,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was 0.0%. For longer-term perspectives, not-seasonally adjusted sales were 55.5% below the “housing bubble” peak and 2.5% below the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The median sales price of new houses sold in February 2018 was $326,800 (+$1,900 or 0.6% MoM); meanwhile, the average sales price edged down to $376,700 (-$400 or 0.1%). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 13.7% of the total sold, down from the year-earlier 17.6%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 3.9% of those sold in February, unchanged from a year earlier.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in February, single-unit completions rose by 26,000 units (+3.0%). The combination of increasing completions and falling sales (4,000 units; -0.6%) caused months of inventory for sale to expand in both absolute and months-of-inventory terms (6,000 units; +0.1 month). 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales rose by 160,000 units (+3.0%) in February, to a SAAR of 5.540 million units (5.42 million expected). As a result, inventory of existing homes for sale expanded in absolute terms (+70,000 units) but remained stable in months-of-inventory terms. Because new-home sales decreased while existing-home sales rose, the share of total sales comprised of new homes declined, to 10.0%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in February nudged up to $241,700 (+$900 or 0.4% MoM). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability improved modestly as the median price of existing homes for sale in January fell by $6,200 (-2.5%; +5.7 YoY), to $241,700. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of less than +0.1% (+6.2% YoY) -- marking a new all-time high for the index.
“The home price surge continues,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “Since the market bottom in December 2012, the S&P Corelogic Case-Shiller National Home Price index has climbed at a 4.7% real (inflation adjusted) annual rate. That is twice the rate of economic growth as measured by the GDP. While price gains vary from city to city, there are few, if any, really weak spots. Seattle, up 12.9% in the last year, continues to see the largest gains, followed by Las Vegas up 11.1% over the same period. Even Chicago and Washington, the cities with the smallest price gains, saw a 2.4% annual increase in home prices.
“Two factors supporting price increases are the low inventory of homes for sale and the low vacancy rate among owner-occupied housing. The current months-supply -- how many months at the current sales rate would be needed to absorb homes currently for sale -- is 3.4; the average since 2000 is 6.0 months, and the high in July 2010 was 11.9. Currently, the homeowner vacancy rate is 1.6% compared to an average of 2.1% since 2000; it peaked in 2010 at 2.7%. Despite limited supplies, rising prices, and higher mortgage rates, affordability is not a concern. Affordability measures published by the National Association of Realtors show that a family with a median income could comfortably afford a mortgage for a median priced home.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Saturday, March 17, 2018

February 2018 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in February at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,236,000 units (1.284 million expected). This is 7.0% (±16.7%)* below the revised January estimate of 1,329,000 (originally 1.326 million units) and 4.0% (±12.2%)* below the February 2017 SAAR of 1,288,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was -2.2%.
Single-family housing starts in February were at a SAAR of 902,000; this is 2.9% (±10.8%)* above the revised January figure of 877,000 (+2.9%). Multi-family starts: 334,000 units (-26.1% MoM; -20.0% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Privately-owned housing completions in February were at a SAAR of 1,319,000 units. This is 7.8% (±14.8%)* above the revised January estimate of 1,224,000 and 13.6% (±16.0%)* above the February 2017 SAAR of 1,161,000 units; the NSA comparison: +15.5% YoY.
Single-family housing completions in February were at a rate of 895,000; this is 3.0% (±10.6%)* above the revised January rate of 869,000 (+18.6%). Multi-family completions: 424,000 units (+19.4% MoM; +9.2% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits were authorized at a SAAR of 1,298,000 units (1.324 million expected). This is 5.7% (±0.7%) below the revised January rate of 1,377,000, but is 6.5% (±2.4%) above the February 2017 rate of 1,219,000 units; the NSA comparison: +6.7% YoY.
Single-family authorizations in February were at a SAAR of 872,000; this is 0.6% (±0.9%)* below the revised January figure of 877,000 (+5.7% YoY). Multi-family: 426,000 (-14.8% MoM; +8.9% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes edged down one point to a level of 70 in March from a downwardly revised February reading on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) but remains in strong territory.
“Builders’ optimism continues to be fueled by growing consumer demand for housing and confidence in the market,” said NAHB Chairman Randy Noel. “However, builders are reporting challenges in finding buildable lots, which could limit their ability to meet this demand.”
“A strong labor market, rising incomes and a growing economy are boosting demand for homeownership even as interest rates rise,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “With these economic fundamentals in place, the single-family sector should continue to make gains at a gradual pace in the months ahead.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

February 2018 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) rose 1.1% in February (+0.3% expected) following a decline of 0.3% in January. Manufacturing production increased 1.2% (+0.4% expected), its largest gain since October. Mining output jumped 4.3%, mostly reflecting strong gains in oil and gas extraction. The index for utilities fell 4.7%, as warmer-than-normal temperatures last month reduced the demand for heating. At 108.2% of its 2012 average, total industrial production in February was 4.4% higher than it was a year earlier. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Industry Groups
In February, manufacturing output increased 1.2%. Gains were recorded by every major manufacturing industry except for electrical equipment, appliances, and components and for petroleum and coal products. The production of durables climbed 1.8% (wood products: +2.6%), and the index for nondurables moved up 0.7% (paper products: +0.4%). The output of other manufacturing (publishing and logging) increased 0.4%.
The output of mining jumped 4.3% in February, more than reversing its decline in January. The gain in the index for February reflected strength in the oil and gas sector and in coal mining. The index for oil and gas extraction in February was about 12% higher than its year-earlier level and was at the highest level in the history of the series. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector climbed 0.7 percentage point in February to 78.1%, its highest reading since January 2015 but still 1.7 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2017) average.
Manufacturing CU rose 0.9 percentage point to 76.9% in February (77.7% expected). The factory operating rate has risen 1.3 percentage points over the past 12 months to reach its highest level since April 2008, but it was still 1.4 percentage points below its long-run average. Utilization for durables increased 1.2 percentage points to 76.8%, a rate that is 0.1 percentage point below its long-run average. The operating rates for both nondurables and other manufacturing rose 0.5 percentage point, to 78.0% and 63.4%, respectively (wood products: +2.5%; paper products: +0.4%). Utilization for mining rose 3.3 percentage points to 87.6%, which is 0.6 percentage point above its long-run average. The capacity utilization rate for utilities fell 3.9 percentage points to 76.9% and remained below its long-run average. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries level nudged up 0.2% (+1.3% YoY) to 138.5% of 2012 output. Manufacturing (NAICS basis) rose fractionally (+0.1% MoM; +0.9% YoY) to 138.2%. Wood products: +0.2% (+0.7% YoY) to 157.1%; paper products: 0.0% (0.0% YoY) to 110.5%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

January 2018 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports retreated (8 MMBF or -5.4%) in January, while imports fell (99 MMBF or -8.0%). Exports were 6 MMBF (+4.6%) above year-earlier levels; imports were 160 MMBF (-12.2%) lower. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 166 MMBF (14.1%) smaller. Moreover, the average net export deficit for the 12 months ending January 2018 was 11.6% smaller than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above). 
Click image for larger view
Asia (especially China: 23.6%) and North America (of which Canada: 21.1%; Mexico: 17.2%) were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports in December; the Caribbean ranked third with a 19.4% share. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were +22.9% relative to the same months in 2016. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of most (88.5%) of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Imports from Canada are 16.5% lower YTD than the same months in 2017. Overall, YTD exports were up 4.6% compared to 2017, while imports were down 12.2%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
U.S. softwood lumber export activity through the Eastern customs region represented the largest proportion in January (39.7% of the U.S. total), followed by the West Coast (29.0%) and the Gulf (21.9%) regions. However, Seattle regained its lead (16.9% of the U.S. total) over Savannah (14.8%) as the single most-active district. At the same time, Great Lakes customs region handled 61.2% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably the Duluth, MN district (27.4%) -- coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 33.9% of all softwood lumber exports in January, Douglas-fir (12.1%) and treated lumber (14.2%). Southern pine exports were up 14.8% YTD relative to 2017, while treated: -5.9%; Doug-fir: +10.5%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

February 2018 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2% in February (+0.2% expected). The indexes for shelter, apparel, and motor vehicle insurance all rose and contributed to the seasonally adjusted increase in the all items index. The food index was unchanged in February, as a decline in the index for food at home offset an increase in the food away from home index. The energy index increased slightly, with its component indexes mixed.
The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.2% in February following a 0.3% increase in January. Along with shelter, apparel, and motor vehicle insurance, the indexes for household furnishings and operations, education, personal care, and airline fares also increased in February. In contrast, the indexes for communication, new vehicles, medical care, and used cars and trucks declined over the month.
The all items index rose 2.2% for the 12 months ending February, a slightly larger increase than the 2.1% rise for the 12 months ending January. The index for all items less food and energy rose 1.8% over the past year, while the energy index increased 7.7% and the food index advanced 1.4%. 
The Producer Price Index for final demand advanced 0.2% in February (+0.2% expected). Final demand prices rose 0.4% in January and were unchanged in December. In February, the rise in final demand prices is attributable to a 0.3% advance in the index for final demand services. In contrast, prices for final demand goods edged down 0.1%. 
The final demand index increased 2.8% for the 12 months ended in February.  The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services climbed 0.4% in February, the same as in January. For the 12 months ended in February, prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services increased 2.7%, the largest rise since 12 month percent-change data were available in August 2014. 
Final Demand
Final demand services: Prices for final demand services moved up 0.3% in February, the same as in January. Most of the February advance can be traced to the index for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing, which increased 0.3%. Prices for final demand transportation and warehousing services also moved higher, rising 0.9%. Conversely, margins for final demand trade services declined 0.2%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)
Product detail: A major factor in the February advance in prices for final demand services was the index for traveler accommodation services, which climbed 3.7%. The indexes for automotive fuels and lubricants retailing, food retailing, bundled wired telecommunications access services, hospital inpatient care, and airline passenger services also moved higher. In contrast, margins for machinery, equipment, parts, and supplies wholesaling fell 1.4%. The indexes for apparel, jewelry, footwear, and accessories retailing and for cable and satellite subscriber services also decreased.
Final demand goods: Prices for final demand goods edged down 0.1% in February, the first decline since falling 0.5% in May 2017. In February, a 0.4% decrease in the index for final demand foods and a 0.5% decline in prices for final demand energy slightly outweighed a 0.2% increase in the index for final demand goods less foods and energy.
Product detail: Leading the February decrease in the index for final demand goods, prices for fresh and dry vegetables dropped 27.1%. The indexes for gasoline, light motor trucks, diesel fuel, and liquefied petroleum gas also moved lower. Conversely, prices for primary basic organic chemicals jumped 7.2%. The indexes for chicken eggs, residential natural gas, and beef and veal also advanced. 
Click image for larger version
No not-seasonally adjusted price index we track decreased on either a MoM or YoY basis. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, March 9, 2018

February 2018 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment rose by 313,000 jobs in February -- considerably above expectations of +205,000. Moreover, December and January employment gains were revised up by 54,000 (December: +15,000; January: +39,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) was unchanged at 4.1% as expansion in the labor force (+806,000) was roughly balanced by the number of persons finding jobs (+785,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* The household and establishment surveys were not in sync, but as one analyst put it, “you have a choice between great and even better” headline numbers.
* We have often been critical of the BLS’s seeming to “plump” the headline numbers with favorable adjustment factors; that does not appear to have been true in February. Although imputed jobs from by the CES (business birth/death model) adjustment were above average for the month of February (since 2000); howeer, the BLS applied the largest seasonal adjustment for a February to the base data. Had average February adjustments been used, employment changes might have been roughly +579,000 instead of the reported +313,000.
* As for industry details, Manufacturing expanded by 31,000 jobs. That result is consistent with the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which expanded in February at a faster pace than January. Wood Products employment gained 3,300 jobs (ISM was unchanged); Paper and Paper Products: +800 (ISM was unchanged). Construction employment jumped by 61,000 (ISM increased). 
Click image for larger view
* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) fell by 653,000 (-0.7%) -- the third-largest monthly drop on record -- to 95.0 million. Meanwhile, the employment-population ratio edged up by 0.3 percentage point, to 60.4%; thus, for every five people being added to the population, roughly three are employed. 
Click image for larger view
* Unlike the unemployment rate, the labor force participation rate (LFPR) rose to 63.0% -- comparable to levels seen in the late-1970s. Average hourly earnings of all private employees rose by $0.04, to $26.75, resulting in a 2.6% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages advanced by $0.06, to $22.40 (+2.5% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls lengthened (+0.1 hr) to 34.5 hours, average weekly earnings increased by $4.06, to $922.88 (+2.9% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of 2.1% in January, workers appear -- officially, at least -- to be holding steady in terms of purchasing power. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs jumped by 729,000. Those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- rose by 171,000. Those holding multiple jobs advanced by 19,000. 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld decreased in February, by $36.7 billion (-15.5% MoM; -1.5% YoY), to $200.7 billion; on a workday-adjusted basis, withholding fell by 11.2% MoM. To reduce some of the volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending February was 4.7% above the year-earlier average -- well off the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

February 2018 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil edged lower in February, decreasing by $1.47 (-2.3%), to $62.23 per barrel. The retreat coincided with a modestly stronger U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 196,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) drop in the amount of oil supplied/demanded during December (to 20.1 million BPD), and a gradual rise in accumulated oil stocks (to 426 million barrels). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
From the 5 March 2018 issue of Peak Oil Review:
Oil prices fell sharply last week ending up at $61.25 in New York and $64.37 in London. A higher than expected increase in crude stocks and gasoline was the impetus for the decline.  An unexpected decline in Chinese economic activity, likely due to the winter holiday, did not help the outlook for oil nor did President's Trump's announcement of new tariffs and the remark that "trade wars are good, and easy to win" did not help the outlook for oil prices. U.S. oil production and the oil-rig count continue to climb slowly. Talk in Washington of crippling new sanctions on Venezuela which would likely remove still more of its oil from the export stream did not help the situation.
The price setback may be only temporary as the market has become enthralled with the current pace of production increases by the U.S. shale oil industry. Many observers are saying that the demand for oil will remain strong into 2020 when the growing electric vehicle industry could start eroding the demand for oil. This projection assumes that the global economy stays healthy for the next few years despite numerous voices sounding alarms.
The OPEC Production Cut:  The cartel produced 32.28 million BPD in February -- a reduction of 70,000 BPD in comparison to January. The February output was the lowest since last April. The carefully watched compliance with the November 2016 agreement rose to 149 percent in February, jumping five points from January. Some are saying the job of balancing the market is not complete. Even though international oil prices in January topped $71 per barrel, they fell below $64 for a short time last week. Much of the drop in supply was due to the UAE which for the past year has been slow in keeping up its part of the agreement.
U.S. Shale Oil Production: U.S. drillers increased the rig count to 800 for the first time in almost three years. The pace of drilling has grown in an almost-unbroken streak since the beginning of November signaling even bigger production jumps yet to come. Between 2010 and 2015, annual U.S. oil production grew by four million BPD. Production dropped due to the lower prices in 2016, but then rose by 1.2 million BPD between January and December 2017.
In its 2018 Annual Energy Outlook, the EIA makes three projections as to what will happen between now and 2050.  In the most likely "reference" or middle case U.S. oil production climbs from the current 10 million BPD to 12 million and stays close to this level for the next 32 years. The low case has production peaking around the current level and then wilting away to 7 or 8 million BPD by 2050.  In the high, or wildly optimistic, case, U.S. oil production climbs and climbs to around 19 million BPD three decades from now.
The Reference case projection which assumes that oil finding and drilling technologies will continue to improve as they have in recent years has come in for sharp criticism as it is seen as the official U.S. government projection as to where our oil production is going. The heart of these criticisms is that except for the Permian Basin, other U.S. shale oil fields have already peaked or are unlikely to grow significantly. U.S. offshore production currently is not receiving enough investment to grow significantly.
This rapid growth leaves the Permian as America's hope for energy dominance. The basin, which has been producing conventional oil for nearly 100 years is currently producing about 2.9 million BPD up from less than 1 million ten years ago. The EIA estimates that oil production from the Permian is currently growing by about 75,000 BPD each month with 258,000 BPD from newly opened wells outpacing the monthly decline of about 183,000 BPD from older wells.
Critics are saying that this rate of increase is unlikely to last. Drillers are concentrating on a finite number of productive sweet spots which will not last for the next 30 years. Costs are rising rapidly so that an increasing number of wells will be losing money. Finally, outside analysts who have examined oil production from the Permian closely say that these expensive "new technologies" do not increase the amount of oil extracted from each new well, but only get similar amounts of oil out faster. The amount of oil that will ultimately be recovered from each well remains about the same depending on the quality of the location that is drilled.
The course of production from the Permian over the next few years may be key to what happens to the U.S. and even world oil production. If drillers cannot come up with some 180,000 BPD of new production each month then production will start to decline. The state of the U.S. economy over the next few years will be another factor with higher interest rates adding a heavy burden to an industry which has been operating at a loss for a decade. 
Click image for larger view
From Oilprice.com’s 2 March 2018 issue of Oil & Energy Insider:
Oil prices fell sharply at the close of the week, as the EIA reported a larger-than-expected build in crude oil inventories, while gasoline stocks also rose. Meanwhile, the surprise announcement that the Trump administration was planning harsh tariffs on imported steel led to a broad selloff in financial markets, particularly those in the industrial sector - with negative implications for commodities. An early morning tweet from President Trump, arguing that "trade wars are good, and easy to win," doesn't bode well for global equities and commodities.
U.S. considers crippling sanctions on Venezuela. Venezuela is set to hold presidential elections on April 22, but because it is widely regarded as a rigged affair, the U.S. is gearing up for another round of sanctions on the struggling South American nation. No decision has been made, but among the measures could be a ban on Venezuelan oil imports into the U.S., a ban on U.S. diluent to Venezuela, a ban on oil tanker insurance, or some combination of those options, perhaps in several waves. Any/all of these sanctions would be crippling to Venezuela, which is already expected to see a decline of oil production by several hundred thousand barrels per day this year. U.S. sanctions could lead to wider losses.
ExxonMobil makes another Guyana discovery. ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) and its partner, Hess Corp. (NYSE: HES), announced its seventh major oil discovery in the Stabroek block off the coast of Guyana after it drilled the Pacora-1 exploration well. The well, according to the companies, will included in the third phase of development, which will ultimately lead to more than 500,000 bpd of new supply.
Exxon quits Russia joint venture. After years of limbo, ExxonMobil decided to call it quits on its joint venture with Russia's Rosneft, after initially pulling back following U.S. sanctions on Russia in 2014. Rosneft warned it would lead to "serious losses" for the oil major, but welcomed Exxon's return if the "legal possibility arises," Reuters reports. In 2014, Exxon was forced to end work just weeks after it and its Russian partner made a major discovery in the Russian Arctic.
OPEC to meet with shale companies. The Secretary-General of OPEC, Mohammad Barkindo, plans on meeting with shale executives on Monday in Houston, the second year the group's leader has done so. "One of the lessons learned from this oil-price cycle is that as producers we are all in the same boat," Mohammad Barkindo told Bloomberg in an interview. The meeting will be held on the sidelines of the CERAWeek Conference in Houston, a widely attended event from industry executives and policymakers from around the world.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

January 2018 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments increased $2.8 billion or 0.6% to $498.8 billion in January. Durable goods shipments increased $0.7 billion or 0.3% to $247.1 billion led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $2.1 billion or 0.8% to $251.7 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of wood products edged down by 0.1%; paper: +0.4%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $2.1 billion or 0.3% to $672.4 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.35, unchanged from December. Inventories of durable goods increased $1.3 billion or 0.3% to $408.8 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories increased $0.7 billion or 0.3% to $263.6 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of both wood products and paper were unchanged. 
Click image for larger view
New orders decreased $6.9 billion or 1.4% to $491.7 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders rose (+0.4% MoM; +8.4% YoY). Durable goods orders decreased $9.0 billion or 3.6% to $240.0 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- declined (-0.3% MoM; +8.1% YoY). New orders for nondurable goods increased $2.1 billion or 0.8% to $251.7 billion.
As can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders were essentially flat between early 2012 and mid-2014, recouping on average 70% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. Even with June 2017’s transportation-led jump, the recovery in real new orders is back to just 57% of the ground given up in the Great Recession. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders decreased $2.9 billion or 0.3% to $1,141.2 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.54, down from 6.58 in December. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders then jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have gradually declined; not only are they back below the December 2008 peak, but they are also generally diverging from the January 2010-to-June 2014 trend-growth line.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, March 5, 2018

February 2018 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In February the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar (USD) appreciated versus Canada’s “loonie” (+1.3%), but depreciated against the euro (-1.2%) and yen (-2.6%). On a trade-weighted index basis, the USD strengthened by 0.3% versus a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

February 2018 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed that the expansion in U.S. manufacturing accelerated in February. The PMI registered 60.8%, up 1.7 percentage points from the January reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. All of the sub-indexes except new orders and production were consistent with heightened activity; moreover, no industries reported paying lower input prices. 
Click image for larger version
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- took a modest breather when decelerating slightly (-0.4 percentage point) to 59.5%. Employment and imports were the only sub-indexes with notable declines; as with manufacturing, no service industries reported paying lower prices. 
Click image for larger version
Of the industries we track, all except Wood Products expanded. Respondent comments included the following:
* "Lumber-related costs continue to increase as supply is also starting to become a problem. The market volatility of construction materials and the short supply of construction labor have added difficulty to long-term planning" (Construction).
Relevant commodities --
* Priced higher: Fuel (diesel and gasoline); labor (general, construction and temporary); lumber; OSB; natural gas; paper; caustic soda; corrugate; and crude oil.
* Priced lower: None.
* Prices mixed: None.
* In short supply: Construction subcontractors; labor (general, construction and temporary).

IHS Markit’s February surveys diverged slightly from ISM’s in terms of overall activity, but were consistent in showing higher input prices.
Manufacturing -- PMI close to three-year peak as new order inflows hit 13-month high.
Key findings:
* Growth in new business accelerates...
* ... but output expands at softer pace;
* Inflationary pressures intensify.
Services -- Business activity expansion accelerates to six-month high.
Key findings:
* Output growth quickens to sharp rate;
* Upturn in new business strongest since March 2015;
* Input price inflation accelerates to fastest since June 2015.

Commenting on the data, Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist said --
Manufacturing: “U.S. factories are enjoying one of the best growth spells seen since 2014, boding well for the sector to make a solid contribution to GDP in the first quarter.
“The survey’s output index readings for the first two months of 2018 are indicative of the sector growing at an annualized rate of just under 3%.
“The most encouraging news was another surge in new order inflows, which helped boost optimism about the year ahead and drive further widespread job gains. Manufacturers are clearly in expansion mode, enjoying robust demand from home alongside rising export orders.
“Capacity is still being stretched, however, as indicated by widespread supply chain delays and the build-up of uncompleted orders at factories. Demand, in other words, is running ahead of supply, meaning pricing power is improving. Factory selling prices are consequently rising at the steepest rate for four years.”

Services: “A surge in service sector activity comes as welcome news after a disappointing couple of months, especially is it was accompanied by further robust manufacturing growth in February. So far, the two PMI surveys point to the economy expanding at a steady 2.5% annualized rate in the first quarter.
“With growth of new orders across the two sectors collectively growing at the fastest rate for three years, March could also prove to be a good month for business activity, rounding off a solid opening quarter or the year.
“Capacity is clearly being strained by the upturn in demand, as indicated by the largest build-up of uncompleted orders for nearly three years and reports of increasingly stretched supply chains.
“Encouragingly, business optimism about the year ahead has risen to one of the highest seen over the past three years, suggesting firms will remain in expansion mode to take advantage of the upturn. Hiring and business investment should therefore continue to rise in coming months.
“The concern is that prices continue to rise as demand outstrips supply. Average prices charged for goods and services showed the largest monthly rise since September 2014, which is likely to feed through to higher consumer price inflation.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.