What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Wednesday, May 30, 2018

1Q2018 Gross Domestic Product: Second Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its second estimate of 1Q2018 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) shaved the growth rate of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +2.17% (roughly in line with consensus expectations), down 0.15 percentage point (PP) from the “advance” estimate (“1Qv1”) and -0.71PP from 4Q2017.
All four groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 1Q growth.
Net exports dominated downward revisions to the “1Qv2” headline, with a 0.08PP reduction in exports and an accompanying -0.04PP in imports. The remaining changes were quite modest: Increased consumer spending on goods (+0.11PP) was more than offset by a reduction in spending on services (-0.13PP). Similarly, a cutback in private inventories (-0.30PP) more than negated a 0.29PP bump in nonresidential fixed investment (especially intellectual property products).
Real final sales of domestic product (which exclude inventories) were revised slightly higher (+0.15PP from 1Qv1, to +2.04%) but remained 1.37PP below 4Q2017’s estimate. 
Click image for larger version
Takeaways from Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis included:
-- Consumer spending for goods was still reported to be contracting during the quarter, and the reported growth in services spending weakened materially.
-- The overall annualized growth rate for consumer spending dropped over -2% on a quarter-to-quarter basis.
-- Although household disposable income improved quarter-to-quarter (most likely due to the reduced withholding rates in the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017"), most of that improvement went into increased savings.
“The US economy was probably somewhat cooler than the BEA's already tepid headline number might suggest,” Davis concluded. “Downward trending headline growth rates slightly above 2% is not the stuff that economic dreams are made on.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, May 29, 2018

April 2018 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in April 2018 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 662,000 units (677,000 expected). This is 1.5% (±11.8%)* below the revised March rate of 672,000 (originally 694,000 units), but 11.6% (±23.7%)* above the April 2017 SAAR of 593,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +14.3%. For longer-term perspectives, not-seasonally adjusted sales were 52.3% below the “housing bubble” peak but 22.4% above the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The median sales price of new houses sold in April 2018 was $312,400 (-$23,000 or 6.9% MoM); meanwhile, the average sales price shot up to $407,300 (+$41,300 or 11.3%). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 14.1% of the total sold, up from the year-earlier 10.7%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 4.7% of those sold in April, up from 1.8% a year earlier.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in April, single-unit completions fell by 34,000 units (-4.0%). Despite completions decreasing more than sales (-10,000 units; -1.5%), inventory for sale expanded in both absolute (+2,000 units) and months-of-inventory terms (+0.1 month). 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales fell by 140,000 units (-2.5%) in April, to a SAAR of 5.46 million units (5.600 million expected). Inventory of existing homes for sale expanded in absolute and months-of-inventory terms (+160,000 units; +0.5 month). Because new-home sales decreased by a smaller proportion than existing-home sales, the share of total sales comprised of new homes advanced to 10.8%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in April advanced to $257,900 (+$8,100 or 3.2% MoM). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability degraded notably as the median price of existing homes for sale in March jumped by $9,500 (+3.9%; +5.9 YoY), to $252,100. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.8% (+6.5% YoY) -- marking a new all-time high for the index.
“The home price increases continue with the National Index rising at 6.5% per year,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “Seattle continues to report the fastest rising prices at 13% per year, double the National Index pace. While Seattle has been the city with the largest gains for 19 months, the ranking among other cities varies. Las Vegas and San Francisco saw the second and third largest annual gains of 12.4% and 11.3%. A year ago, they ranked 10th and 16th. Any doubts that real, or inflation-adjusted, home prices are climbing rapidly are eliminated by considering Chicago; the city reported the lowest 12-month gain among all cities in the index of 2.8%, almost a percentage point ahead of the inflation rate.
“Looking across various national statistics on sales of new or existing homes, permits for new construction, and financing terms, two figures that stand out are rapidly rising home prices and low inventories of existing homes for sale. Months-of-supply, which combines inventory levels and sales, is currently at 3.8 months, lower than the levels of the 1990s, before the housing boom and bust. Until inventories increase faster than sales, or the economy slows significantly, home prices are likely to continue rising. Compared to the price gains of the last boom in the early 2000s, things are calmer today. Gains in the National Index peaked at 14.5% in September 2005, more quickly than Seattle is rising now.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

April 2018 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in April at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,287,000 units (1.325 million expected). This is 3.7% (±11.4%)* below the revised March estimate of 1,336,000 (originally 1.319 million units), but 10.5% (±9.7%) above the April 2017 SAAR of 1,165,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was +11.8%.
Single-family housing starts in April were at a SAAR of 894,000; this is 0.1% (±11.8%)* above the revised March figure of 893,000 (+9.6% YoY). Multi-family starts: 393,000 units (-11.3% MoM; +17.7% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions in April were at a SAAR of 1,257,000 units. This is 2.8% (±10.1%)* above the revised March estimate of 1,223,000 and 14.8% (±10.5%) above the April 2017 SAAR of 1,095,000 units; the NSA comparison: +14.0% YoY.
Single-family housing completions in April were at a rate of 820,000; this is 4.0% (±9.2%)* below the revised March rate of 854,000 (+5.0% YoY). Multi-family completions: 437,000 units (+18.4% MoM; 37.3% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits in April were at a SAAR of 1,352,000 units (1.350 million expected). This is 1.8% (±1.3%) below the revised March rate of 1,377,000 (originally 1.354 million units), but 7.7% (±0.9%) above the April 2017 SAAR of 1,255,000 units; the NSA comparison: +13.0% YoY.
Single-family authorizations in April were at a rate of 859,000; this is 0.9% (±1.4%)* above the revised March figure of 851,000. (+13.4% YoY). Multi-family: 493,000 (-6.3% MoM; +12.0% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes rose two points to a level of 70 in May after a downwardly revised April reading on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). This is the fourth time the HMI has reached 70 or higher this year.
“The solid May report shows that builders are buoyed by growing consumer demand for single-family homes,” said NAHB Chairman Randy Noel. “However, the record-high cost of lumber is hurting builders’ bottom lines and making it more difficult to produce competitively priced houses for newcomers to the market.”
“Tight housing inventory, employment gains and demographic tailwinds should continue to boost demand for newly-built single-family homes,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “With these fundamentals in place, the housing market should improve at a steady, gradual pace in the months ahead.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2018 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) rose 0.7% in April (+0.6% expected) for its third consecutive monthly increase. The rates of change for IP for previous months were revised downward, on net, by 1 percentage point (PP); for 1Q2018, output is now reported to have advanced 2.3% at an annual rate (previously 4.5%). After being unchanged in March, manufacturing output rose 0.5% in April. The indexes for mining and utilities moved up 1.1% and 1.9%, respectively. At 107.3% of its 2012 average, total IP in April was 3.5% higher than it was a year earlier. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Industry Groups
Manufacturing output moved up 0.5% in April; for 1Q, the index registered a downwardly revised increase of 1.4% at an annual rate (previously 3.1%). The indexes for durables and nondurables each gained about 0.5%, while the production of other manufacturing industries (publishing and logging) rose nearly 1%. Among durables, advances of more than 1% were posted by machinery; computer and electronic products; electrical equipment, appliances, and components; and aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment. The largest losses, slightly more than 1%, were recorded by motor vehicles and parts and by wood products (-1.2%). The increase in nondurables reflected widespread gains among its industries (paper products: +0.4%).
The output of mining rose 1.1% in April and was 10.6% above its year-earlier level. The increase in the mining index reflected further gains in the oil and gas sector but was tempered by a drop in coal mining. Meanwhile, the index for utilities advanced 1.9%. The output of electric utilities was little changed, but the output of gas utilities jumped more than 10% as a result of strong demand for heating due to below-normal temperatures. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector climbed 0.4PP (+0.6%) to 78.0%, a rate that is 1.8PP below its long-run (1972–2017) average.
Manufacturing CU rose to 75.8%, a rate that is 2.5PP below its long-run average. Increases were observed in all three main categories of manufacturing. The operating rates for durables and nondurables each moved up about 0.25PP (wood products: -1.5%; paper products: +0.4%), and the rate for other manufacturing rose about 0.75PP. Utilization for mining rose about 0.5PP and remained above its long-run average; the rate for utilities jumped more than 1PP. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries level nudged up 0.2% (+1.1 % YoY) to 137.6% of 2012 output. Manufacturing (NAICS basis) rose fractionally (+0.1% MoM; +1.1% YoY) to 137.6%. Wood products: +0.3% (+1.8% YoY) to 160.0%; paper products: 0.0% (0.0% YoY) to 111.3%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, May 10, 2018

April 2018 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2% in April (+0.3% expected). The indexes for gasoline and shelter were the largest factors in the seasonally adjusted increase in the all-items index, although the food index increased as well. The gasoline index increased 3.0%, more than offsetting declines in other energy component indexes and led to a 1.4% rise in the energy index. The food index rose 0.3%, with the food at home index rising 0.3% and the index for food away from home increasing 0.2%.
The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.1% in April. The shelter index rose 0.3%, with other indexes mixed. The indexes for household furnishings and operations, personal care, tobacco, medical care, and apparel all increased in April, while those for used cars and trucks, new vehicles, recreation, and airline fares all declined. 
The all-items index rose 2.5% for the 12 months ending April; this figure has been mostly trending upward since it was 1.6% for the period ending June 2017. The index for all items less food and energy rose 2.1% for the 12 months ending April. The food index increased 1.4%, and the energy index rose 7.9%.
The Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) rose 0.1% in April (+0.3% expected). Final demand prices advanced 0.3% in March and 0.2% in February. In April, the index for final demand services advanced 0.1%, and prices for final demand goods were unchanged.
The final demand index increased 2.6% for the 12 months ended in April. The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services edged up 0.1% in April after increasing 0.4% in March. For the 12 months ended in April, prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services advanced 2.5%.
Final Demand
Final demand services: Prices for final demand services inched up 0.1% in April, the fourth straight rise. The advance in April was led by the index for final demand trade services, which increased 0.2%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Prices for final demand transportation and warehousing services rose 0.6%. Conversely, the index for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing services declined 0.1%.
Product detail: A major factor in the April advance in prices for final demand services was the index for machinery, equipment, parts, and supplies wholesaling, which climbed 0.9%. The indexes for services related to securities brokerage and dealing (partial), residential real estate loans (partial), airline passenger services, and wireless telecommunication services also moved higher. In contrast, prices for traveler accommodation services fell 3.2%. The indexes for health, beauty, and optical goods retailing; legal services; and apparel wholesaling also decreased.
Final demand goods: Prices for final demand goods were unchanged in April after increasing 0.3% in March. In April, a 0.3% rise in the index for final demand goods less foods and energy and a 0.1% advance in prices for final demand energy offset a 1.1% drop in the index for final demand foods.
Product detail: Among prices for final demand goods in April, the index for tobacco products jumped 2.6%. The indexes for carbon steel scrap; search, detection, navigation, and guidance systems; pharmaceutical preparations; diesel fuel; and prepared poultry products also increased. Conversely, prices for fresh and dry vegetables fell 17.8%. The indexes for chicken eggs, beef and veal, residential electric power, and basic organic chemicals also moved lower. 
Click image for larger version
Only the not-seasonally adjusted price indexes for Softwood Lumber and Wood Fiber decreased on a MoM basis. All of the indexes rose YoY. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, May 7, 2018

April 2018 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In April the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar (USD) depreciated versus Canada’s “loonie” (-1.6%), but appreciated against both the euro (0.5%) and yen (+1.5%). On a trade-weighted index basis, the USD was unchanged versus a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

March 2018 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports advanced (22 MMBF or +14.7%) in March, and imports rose (226 MMBF or +22.2%). Exports were 24 MMBF (+16.7%) above year-earlier levels; imports were 130 MMBF (-9.5%) lower. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 154 MMBF (12.6%) smaller. Moreover, the average net export deficit for the 12 months ending March 2018 was 12.1% smaller than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above). 
Click image for larger view
Asia (especially China: 23.0%) and North America (of which Canada: 22.1%; Mexico: 14.3%) were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports in March; the Caribbean ranked third with a 20.9% share. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were +47.6% relative to the same months in 2017. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of most (91.5%) of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Imports from Canada are 15.4% lower YTD than the same months in 2017. Overall, YTD exports were up 12.8% compared to 2017, while imports were down 16.0%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
U.S. softwood lumber export activity through the Eastern customs region represented the largest proportion in March (39.2% of the U.S. total), followed by the West Coast (28.8%) and the Gulf (22.2%) regions. However, Seattle regained its lead (17.9% of the U.S. total) over Mobile (14.8%) and Savannah (13.8%) as the single most-active district. At the same time, Great Lakes customs region handled 64.3% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably the Duluth, MN district (26.5%) -- coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 36.0% of all softwood lumber exports in March, Douglas-fir (11.6%) and treated lumber (12.6%). Southern pine exports were up 34.3% YTD relative to 2017, while treated: +2.7%; Doug-fir: -6.7%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, May 4, 2018

April 2018 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment rose by 164,000 jobs in April -- below expectations of +188,000. However, combined February and March employment gains were revised up by 30,000 (February: -2,000; March: +32,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) fell to 3.9% because of minor employment gains (+3,000) in a contracting labor force (-236,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* The household and establishment surveys were out of sync. As one analyst put it, “…if you believe the establishment survey's employment growth, then it is hard to believe the unemployment rate.”
* We have often been critical of the BLS’s seeming to “plump” the headline numbers with favorable adjustment factors, and the April numbers may be a case in point. Imputed jobs from by the CES (business birth/death model) adjustment were within 4% of the maximum for the month of April (since 2000), but the BLS also applied a slightly more negative-than-average seasonal adjustment to the base data. Had average April adjustments been used, employment changes might have been roughly +116,000 instead of the reported +164,000.
* As for industry details, Manufacturing expanded by 24,000 jobs. That result is reasonably consistent with the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which expanded in April at a slower pace than March. Wood Products employment lost 700 jobs (ISM was unchanged); Paper and Paper Products: -300 (ISM increased). Construction employment gained 17,000 (ISM increased). 
Click image for larger view
* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) rose by 410,000 (+0.4%), to a near-record 95.7 million. Meanwhile, the employment-population ratio ticked down to 60.1%; thus, for every five people being added to the population, roughly three are employed. 
Click image for larger view
* The labor force participation rate (LFPR) slipped to 62.8% -- comparable to levels seen in the late-1970s. Average hourly earnings of all private employees rose by $0.04, to $26.84, resulting in a 2.6% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages advanced by $0.05, to $22.51 (+2.6% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged at 34.5 hours, average weekly earnings increased by $1.39 (+0.1%), to $925.98 (+3.2% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of 2.4% in March, workers appear -- officially, at least -- to be holding steady in terms of purchasing power. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs recouped the ground lost in March, rising by 319,000. Those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- slid by 34,000; non-economic reasons: -141,000. Those holding multiple jobs advanced by 58,000. 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld decreased in April, by $33.7 billion (-14.7% MoM; +2.7% YoY), to $195.7 billion; it is difficult to conclude anything meaningful from the data beyond speculating that the falloff reflects lower withholding rates from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. To reduce some of the volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending April was 0.4% below the year-earlier average -- well off the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, May 3, 2018

April 2018 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed that the expansion in U.S. manufacturing decelerated noticeably in April. The PMI registered 57.3%, down 2.0 percentage points from the March reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. Only 2.6% of respondents reported paying lower prices; 61.2% reported paying higher prices. "The increases in prices across all industry sectors continues," said ISM’s Timothy Fiore, noting “price increases in metals (all steels, steel components, aluminum and copper), corrugate, wood, wood products and plastics.” Moreover, the Prices sub-index is at its highest level since April 2011. 
Click image for larger version
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- also slowed (-2.0 percentage points) to 56.8%. Price increases were somewhat more subdued in the service sector: 33% reported higher prices; 4% lower prices. 
Click image for larger version
All of the industries we track expanded in April. Respondent comments included the following --
·     Construction: "The trade tensions are impacting purchasing of steel and are causing suppliers to send letters of concern regarding contracted purchases for this year and the future based on these proposed tariffs."
·     Finance & Insurance: "Economy is humming along. [Activity in] both residential and commercial construction [is] apparent. Agriculture sector seems to be moderating at these commodity price levels. The international trade situation appears to be shifting on a minute-by-minute basis, which has folks nervous."
·     Public Administration:  "Construction activity continues to remain strong in the region, resulting in capacity issues and shortages of labor, materials and subcontractors."

Relevant commodities --
* Priced higher: Caustic soda; corrugate and corrugated boxes; fuel (diesel and gaoline); and wood.
* Priced lower: None.
* Prices mixed: None.
* In short supply: Construction subcontractors and labor.

IHS Markit’s April surveys presented a much more upbeat view than did ISM’s.
Manufacturing -- U.S. manufacturing operating conditions improve at fastest rate since September 2014.
Key findings:
* PMI rises to highest level in over three-and-a-half years
* Output grows at quickest pace since January 2017
* Inflationary pressures intensify
Services -- New business growth fastest since March 2015.
Key findings:
* New orders increase at accelerated and sharp pace
* Upturn in business activity quickens
* Business confidence highest since May 2015

Commenting on the data, Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist said --
Manufacturing: “April saw US manufacturers reporting the strongest monthly improvement in business conditions since September 2014. The survey suggests the economy has started the second quarter on a solid footing and sends an encouraging signal for GDP growth to accelerate after the modest 2.3% rate of expansion seen in the first quarter.
“With inflows of new orders rising at an accelerated pace, greater input buying and business expectations regarding future production levels running at one of the highest levels seen over the past three years, there’s plenty of evidence to suggest strong growth will persist through May.
“The upturn is being led by large firms, with smaller companies trailing behind but nonetheless also seeing some of the best business conditions for three years.
“Warning lights are being flashed in relation to inflation, however, with factories reporting the strongest rise in prices for nearly seven years. Suppliers are hiking prices in response to surging demand, while tariffs and higher oil prices are also exerting upward pressure on costs. With the average price of goods leaving factories rising at the fastest rate since 2011, consumer price inflation looks set to accelerate.”

Services: “The improved service sector performance comes on the heels of news of faster manufacturing growth, pointing to a welcome broad-based strengthening of the economy at the start of the second quarter.
“As such, the data support the view that second quarter GDP growth will come in stronger than the 2.3% rate seen at the start of the year.
“The two surveys also collectively point to another month of solid job gains, commensurate with the official measure of non-farm payrolls rising by approximately 200,000 in April.
“Perhaps the most important development, however, is the upturn in price pressures. Survey evidence indicates that rising demand has allowed increasing numbers of companies to raise prices for both goods and services in recent months. Higher oil prices are also pushing up costs. Measured across both manufacturing and services, input costs are rising at the fastest rate since 2013, which will inevitably put greater pressure on consumer prices in coming months, all of which makes for a hawkish policy outlook.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

March 2018 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments increased $2.1 billion or 0.4% to $502.8 billion in March. Durable goods shipments increased $0.9 billion or 0.4% to $250.4 billion led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $1.2 billion or 0.5% to $252.4 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of wood products fell by 0.4%; paper: 0.0%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $1.7 billion or 0.3% to $677.3 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.35, unchanged from February. Inventories of durable goods increased $0.5 billion or 0.1% to $411.5 billion, led by machinery. Nondurable goods inventories increased $1.2 billion or 0.5% to $265.8 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of wood products rose by 0.7%; paper: +0.1%. 
Click image for larger view
New orders increased $7.8 billion or 1.6% to $507.7 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders rose (+0.3% MoM; +5.8% YoY). Durable goods orders increased $6.5 billion or 2.6% to $255.2 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- fell (-0.4% MoM; +5.3% YoY). New orders for nondurable goods increased $1.2 billion or 0.5% to $252.4 billion.
As can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders were essentially flat between early 2012 and mid-2014, recouping on average 70% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. Even with June 2017’s transportation-led jump, the recovery in real new orders is back to just 65% of the ground given up in the Great Recession. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $9.2 billion or 0.8% to $1,153.8 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.52, up from 6.51 in February. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders then jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have gradually declined; not only are they back below the December 2008 peak, but they are also generally diverging from the January 2010-to-June 2014 trend-growth line.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

April 2018 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil stepped higher in April, increasing by $3.53 (+5.6%), to $66.25 per barrel. The advance coincided with an essentially stable U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 842,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) drop in the amount of oil supplied/demanded during February (to 19.6 million BPD), and a very modest increase in accumulated oil stocks (monthly average: 430 million barrels). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
From the 30 April 2018 issue of Peak Oil Review:
“With only two weeks to go before President Trump decides whether the US will withdraw from the Iran nuclear treaty, the oil market’s chief concern is about what could happen if the US reimposes sanctions. Even though Washington would have few, if any, allies helping to reimpose sanctions on Iran, the US carries considerable weight in the world banking system by threatening to deny access to the US to anyone doing business with Tehran. Conventional wisdom holds that renewed sanctions would slow Iranian oil exports and drive prices higher. ...
“As production from the Permian Basin increases, the US should be facing a glut of light, sweet crude which cannot be processed efficiently in Gulf Coast refineries.  As could be expected, low US crude prices have sent exports to an all-time high of 2.3 million b/d last week. US exports are expected to remain around this level over the summer or possibly climb even higher. ...
“Total US crude and petroleum exports also hit a record high of 8.3 million b/d the week before last. Much of the increase in oil products is due to the near collapse of Venezuela’s refining capacity and other refining problems around the Caribbean leaving US refiners to pick up the slack.”

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.