What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Thursday, August 29, 2019

2Q2019 Gross Domestic Product: Second Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its second estimate of 2Q2019 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) shaved the growth rate of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +2.04% (2.0% expected), down 0.01 percentage point (PP) from the “advance” estimate (“2Qv1”) and -1.06PP from 1Q2019.
Two of the four GDP component groupings -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 2Q growth; private domestic investment (PDI) and net exports (NetX) detracted from it.
Although the headline number was essentially unchanged, significant portions of aggregate growth shifted from commercial and governmental activities into the consumer sector. Consumer spending was revised upward by 0.26PP (goods: +0.11PP; services: +0.15PP). Offsetting those improvements, growth rates for spending on fixed commercial investments, inventories, government and exports dropped a combined -0.27pp.
The BEA's real final sales of domestic product was revised modestly upward (+0.04PP, to +2.95%), which is +0.38PP from 1Q. 
Click image for larger version
“For the most part, the nearly unchanged headline number reflects the ‘statistical noise’ character of this report,” wrote Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis. “Once again, the deflator being used minimizes the headline number -- simultaneously deflating conspiracy theories about politically motivated tweaking of the underlying assumptions.
“While this is not exactly ‘happy days are here again,’ it is also clearly not doom and gloom. Nor is the U.S. economy -- by itself -- strong enough to pull the global economy out of a global economic funk.
“This may be what an inflection point feels like,” Davis concluded.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, August 27, 2019

July 2019 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in July 2019 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 635,000 units (645,000 expected). This is 12.8 percent (±16.2 percent)* below the revised June rate of 728,000 (originally 646,000), but 4.3 percent (±14.0 percent)* above the July 2018 SAAR of 609,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +1.9%. For longer-term perspectives, not-seasonally adjusted sales were 54.3% below the “housing bubble” peak but 1.4% above the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The median sales price of new houses sold in July rose to $312,800 ($6,800 or +2.2% MoM); meanwhile, the average sales price jumped to $388,000 ($33,500 or +9.4%). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 11.3% of the total sold, down from the year-earlier 11.5%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up less than 1% of those sold in July, down from 3.8% a year earlier.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in July, single-unit completions increased by 38,000 units (+4.3%). Because sales fell (-93,000 units; -12.8%) while completions rose, inventory for sale expanded in both absolute (+4,000 units) and months-of-inventory (+0.9 month) terms. 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales advanced in July (+130,000 units), to a SAAR of 5.42 million units (5.385 million expected). Inventory of existing homes for sale contracted in both absolute (-30,000 units) and months-of-inventory (-0.2 month) terms. The median price of previously owned homes sold in July declined to $280,800 (-$4,500 or 1.6% MoM). Because new-home sales fell while resales rose, the share of total sales comprised of new homes tumbled to 10.5%. 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability edged up (+1.9 percentage points) even as the median price of existing homes for sale in June rose by $8,000 (+2.8%; +4.5 YoY), to $288,900. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices rose at a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.6% (+3.1% YoY) -- the slowest rate of annual appreciation since September 2012.
“Home price gains continue to trend down, but may be leveling off to a sustainable level,” says Philip Murphy, Managing Director and Global Head of Index Governance at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The average YoY gain declined to 3.0% in June, down from 3.1% the prior month. However, fewer cities (12) experienced lower YoY price gains than in May (13).
“The southwest (Phoenix and Las Vegas) remains the regional leader in home price gains, followed by the southeast (Tampa and Charlotte). With three of the bottom five cities (Seattle, San Francisco, and San Diego), much of the west coast is challenged to sustain YoY gains. For the second month in a row, however, only Seattle experienced outright decline with YoY price change of -1.3%. The U.S. National Home Price NSA Index YOY price change in June 2019 of 3.1% is exactly half of what it was in June 2018. While housing has clearly cooled off from 2018, home price gains in most cities remain positive in low single digits. Therefore, it is likely that current rates of change will generally be sustained barring an economic downturn.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, August 19, 2019

July 2019 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in July at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,191,000 units (1.260 million expected). This is 4.0% (±8.0%)* below the revised June estimate of 1,241,000 (originally 1.253 million units), but is 0.6% (±8.2%)* above the July 2018 SAAR of 1,184,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was +1.6%.
Single-family housing starts in July were at a SAAR of 876,000; this is 1.3% (±11.8%)* above the revised June figure of 865,000 (+3.7% YoY). Multi-family starts: 315,000 units (-16.2% MoM; -4.0% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions in July were at a SAAR of 1,250,000 units. This is 7.2% (±11.4%)* above the revised June estimate of 1,166,000 (originally 1.161 million units) and 6.3% (±12.0%)* above the July 2018 SAAR of 1,176,000 units; the NSA comparison: +6.1% YoY.
Single-family housing completions were at a SAAR of 918,000; this is 4.3% (±10.8%)* above the revised June rate of 880,000 (+13.6% YoY). Multi-family completions: 332,000 units (+16.1% MoM; -8.7% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits amounted to a SAAR of 1,336,000 units (1.270 million expected). This is 8.4% (±1.1%) above the revised June rate of 1,232,000 (originally 1.220 million units) and 1.5% (±1.4%) above the July 2018 SAAR of 1,316,000 units; the NSA comparison: +5.3% YoY.
Single-family permits were at a SAAR of 838,000; this is 1.8% (±1.4%) above the revised June figure of 823,000 (+1.4% YoY). Multi-family: 498,000 (+21.8% MoM; +13.7% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes rose one point to 66 in August, according to the latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). Sentiment levels have held at a solid 64-to-66 level for the past four months.
“Even as builders report a firm demand for single-family homes, they continue to struggle with rising construction costs stemming from excessive regulations, a chronic shortage of workers and a lack of buildable lots,” said NAHB Chairman Greg Ugalde. 
“While 30-year mortgage rates have dropped from 4.1% down to 3.6% during the past four months, we have not seen an equivalent higher pace of building activity because the rate declines occurred due to economic uncertainty stemming largely from growing trade concerns,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “Although affordability headwinds remain a challenge, demand is good and growing at lower price points and for smaller homes.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, August 15, 2019

July 2019 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) declined 0.2% in July (+0.1% expected). Manufacturing output decreased 0.4% last month and has fallen more than 1½% since December 2018. In July, mining output fell 1.8%, as Hurricane Barry caused a sharp but temporary decline in oil extraction in the Gulf of Mexico. The index for utilities rose 3.1%. At 109.2% of its 2012 average, total IP was 0.5% higher in July than it was a year earlier. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Industry Groups
Manufacturing output declined 0.4% in July (NAICS manufacturing: -0.4% MoM; -0.5% YoY), with durables, nondurables, and other manufacturing (publishing and logging) all posting decreases. Production fell for most major durable goods categories. The largest declines were recorded by wood products (-1.1%), machinery, and nonmetallic mineral products, while the only sizable gain was registered by aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment. Paper products (+1.3%) posted the only increase among nondurables; the indexes for textile and product mills, for printing and support, and for plastics and rubber products each fell 1.0% or more.
The output of utilities rose 3.1% in July after having fallen a similar amount in June. Despite declining 1.8% in July, the index for mining was 5.5% above its year-earlier level. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector decreased 0.3 percentage point (PP) in July to 77.5%, a rate that is 2.3PP below its long-run (1972–2018) average.
Manufacturing CU declined 0.4PP in July to 75.4%, a rate that is 2.9PP lower than its long-run average (NAICS manufacturing: -0.5%, to 75.9%). The operating rate for durable manufacturing declined 0.3PP, and the rate for nondurable manufacturing decreased 0.5PP (wood products: -1.4%; paper products: +1.3%). The utilization rate for mining fell to 89.2%, which is about 2PP above its long-run average. The rate for utilities increased 2.1PP but remained well below its long-run average. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries level nudged up 0.2% (+2.2 % YoY) to 140.9% of 2012 output. Manufacturing (NAICS basis) rose fractionally (+0.1% MoM; +1.3% YoY) to 139.4%. Wood products: +0.3% (+4.0% YoY) to 166.4%; paper products: 0.0% (-0.6 % YoY) to 109.8%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

July 2019 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.3% in July (+0.2% expected). Increases in the indexes for gasoline and shelter were the major factors in the seasonally adjusted all items monthly increase. The energy index rose in July as the gasoline and electricity indexes increased, though the natural gas index declined. The index for food was unchanged for the second month in a row, as a decline in the food at home index was offset by an increase in the food away from home index.
The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.3 in July, the same increase as in June. The July rise was broad-based, with increases in the indexes for shelter, medical care, airline fares, household furnishings and operations, apparel, and personal care all contributing to the increase. The index for new vehicles was one of the few to decline in July.  
The all items index increased 1.8% for the 12 months ending July, a larger increase than the 1.6% rise for the period ending June. The index for all items less food and energy rose 2.2% over the last 12 months, slightly more than the 2.1% increase for the period ending June. The food index rose 1.8% over the last year while the energy index declined 2.0%. 
The Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI-FD) advanced 0.2% in July (+0.1% expected). Final demand prices moved up 0.1% in both June and May. The rise in final demand prices was led by a 0.4% increase in the index for final demand goods. Prices for final demand construction rose 0.6%. In contrast, the index for final demand services declined 0.1%. The final demand index rose 1.7% for the 12 months ended in July.
The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services fell 0.1% in July, the first decrease since declining 0.1% in October 2015. For the 12 months ended in July, prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services moved up 1.7%.
Final Demand
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods rose 0.4% in July, the largest increase since a 1.0% jump in March. Over 80% of the broad-based advance is attributable to prices for final demand energy, which rose 2.3%. The index for final demand goods less foods and energy inched up 0.1%, and prices for final demand foods increased 0.2%.
Product detail: Over half of the July rise in the index for final demand goods can be traced to prices for gasoline, which advanced 5.2%. The indexes for diesel fuel, electric power, corn, beef and veal, and tobacco products also advanced. Conversely, prices for jet fuel fell 3.5%. The indexes for pork and carbon steel scrap also decreased.
Final demand services: The index for final demand services declined 0.1% in July after rising for five consecutive months. The decrease is attributable to prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing, which moved down 0.3%. In contrast, the indexes for final demand trade services and for final demand transportation and warehousing services both advanced 0.2%.
Product detail: A major factor in the decline in prices for final demand services was the index for guestroom rental, which moved down 4.3%. The indexes for fuels and lubricants retailing, loan services (partial), machinery and equipment parts and supplies wholesaling, and truck transportation of freight also decreased. Conversely, margins for machinery and vehicle wholesaling advanced 3.0%. The indexes for hospital outpatient care; health, beauty, and optical goods retailing; and transportation of passengers (partial) also rose. 
Click image for larger version
The not-seasonally adjusted price indexes we track were mixed on a MoM basis, but all down on a YoY basis. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, August 12, 2019

June 2019 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports decreased (5 MMBF or -4.7%) in June; imports also fell (129 MMBF or -9.2%). Exports were 26 MMBF (-18.9%) below year-earlier levels; imports were 124 MMBF (-9.0%) lower. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 99 MMBF (-7.9%) smaller. Also, the average net export deficit for the 12 months ending June 2019 was 1.3% larger than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above). 
Click image for larger view
North America (41.5%; of which Canada: 22.6%; Mexico: 18.9%) and Asia (27.5%; especially China: 6.0%; and Japan: 6.2%) were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports; the Caribbean ranked third with a 22.2% share. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were -65.8% relative to the same months in 2018. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of most (90.7%) of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Imports from Canada were 2.0% lower YTD than the same months in 2018. Overall, YTD exports were down 25.4% compared to 2018; imports: -1.5%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
U.S. softwood lumber export activity through the West Coast customs region represented the largest proportion (32.8% of the U.S. total), followed by the Gulf (28.9%) and Eastern (28.3%) regions. Seattle (20.4% of the U.S. total) maintained the lead over Mobile (20.0%) as the single most-active district. At the same time, Great Lakes customs region handled 63.6% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably the Duluth, MN district (23.5%) -- coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 27.3% of all softwood lumber exports, Douglas-fir (14.6%) and treated lumber (13.1%) were also significant. Southern pine exports were down 43.4% YTD relative to 2018, while treated: -28.3%; Doug-fir: -6.9%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, August 7, 2019

July 2019 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil edged higher in July, advancing by $2.70 (+4.9%), to $57.36 per barrel. The increase occurred within the context of a marginally weaker U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 147,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) rise in the amount of oil supplied/demanded during May (to 20.3 million BPD), and a decline in accumulated oil stocks (July average: 449 million barrels). 
Click image for larger view
The editors of Peak Oil Review are vacationing during August. 
Click image for larger view
Selected highlights from the 2 August 2019 issue of OilPrice.com’s Oil & Energy Insider include:
Oil prices fell by 7% on Thursday (1 August), the worst single-day performance in over four years. President Trump’s surprise announcement that he would put a 10% tariff on $300 billion worth of Chinese imports caused a widespread selloff in equities and oil prices. China said that it would retaliate if the tariffs go into effect. Trump left open the possibility that the U.S. could hold off, but only if China offered concessions.
Oil rebounds. With a selloff as steep as the one seen on Thursday, it was unsurprising that traders bought on the dip. Oil was up 3% in early trading on Friday (2 August).
Energy stocks melt down. With oil down 7%, nobody in the energy sector was spared. Many companies saw their share prices fall 7 or 8%, some fared better but others posted even deeper loses. Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (or XLE) fell more than 2%.
Concho misses earnings. Concho Resources (NYSE: CXO) reported a surprise 25% decline in quarterly profit on Wednesday, mostly due to lower oil and gas prices. Concho said its Permian wells were spaced too close together, and the company said it would slow the pace of development. Concho’s share price fell by 22% on Thursday.
Iran exports plunge, perhaps down to 100,000 bpd. Iran’s oil exports plunged to just 100,000 bpd in July, although there is a dispute over the accuracy of that data. If true, volumes are down sharply from the 400,000 bpd in June. Meanwhile, the Iranian government approved a plan to lop off a few zeros from its currency and rename it amid bad inflation.
Libyan production falls below 1 mb/d. Libya’s oil production fell to just 950,000 bpd after the Sharara field went offline for the second time in as many weeks. The outage is a sign of deteriorating security as the 4-month civil war drags on.
OPEC production falls to 8-year low. OPEC production fell to just 29.42 mb/d in July, down 280,000 bpd from June. Voluntary cuts from Saudi Arabia and steep losses from Iran contributed to the lower figure.
Trump considers quarantine of Venezuela. When asked if he was considering a blockade or quarantine of some kind of Venezuela, President Trump said: “Yes, I am.” He did not offer any further details.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, August 5, 2019

July 2019 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In July the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar (USD) depreciated versus Canada’s “loonie” (-1.4%), but appreciated against the euro (+0.7%) and yen (+0.2%). On a trade-weighted index basis, the USD lost 0.3% against a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

July 2019 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed that in July the rate of expansion in U.S. manufacturing decelerated to its slowest since August 2016. The PMI registered 51.2%, down 0.5 percentage point (PP) from the June reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. The collapse in order backlogs (-4.3PP) overwhelmed the modest rise in new orders (+0.8PP). 
Click image for larger version
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- also decelerated (-1.4PP, to 53.7%) to its slowest rate since August 2016. Although service-industry inventories dropped to the breakeven 50%, they are nonetheless increasingly seen as still too high. 
Click image for larger version
Of the industries we track, Paper Products and Ag & Forestry contracted. Respondent comments included the following:
Construction -- "Tariffs continue to push costs higher, and customers are looking for more discounts due to mortgage-rate fluctuations."

Relevant commodities:
Priced higher -- Paper products.
Priced lower -- Corrugated boxes.
Prices mixed -- Fuel (diesel and gasoline).
In short supply -- Construction subcontractors; and labor (general, construction and temporary).

IHS Markit’s July survey headlines were mixed relative to those of ISM.
Manufacturing -- PMI falls to lowest since September 2009
Key findings:
* Fractional output growth and muted demand hold back overall expansion
* Employment falls for first time since June 2013
* Output expectations moderate to series low

Services -- New business growth accelerates to four-month high in July
Key findings:
* Faster rates of expansion in output and new orders
* Business expectations slip to new series low
* Selling prices rise only fractionally

Commentary by Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist:
Manufacturing -- "U.S. manufacturing has entered into its sharpest downturn since 2009, suggesting the goods-producing sector is on course to act as a significant drag on the economy in 3Q. The deterioration in the survey’s output index is indicative of manufacturing production declining at an annualized rate in excess of 3%.
“Falling business spending at home and declining exports are the main drivers of the downturn, with firms also cutting back on input buying as the outlook grows gloomier. U.S. manufacturers’ expectations of output in the year ahead has sunk to its lowest since comparable data were first available in 2012, with worries focused on the detrimental impact of escalating trade wars, fears of slower economic growth and rising geopolitical worries.
“Employment is now also falling for only the second time in almost ten years as factories pull back on hiring amid the growing uncertainty.
“More positively, new order inflows picked up for a second successive month. Although remaining worryingly subdued compared to the strong growth seen earlier in the year, the modest improvement will fuel hope that production growth could tick higher in August.”

Services -- “An improvement in the overall rate of business growth signaled by the services PMI for July is welcome news, but the overall weak pace of expansion remains a concern. The PMIs for manufacturing and services collectively point to GDP expanding at an annualized rate of under 2% in July, below that seen in 2Q and among the weakest seen over the past three years.
"A sharp drop in future expectations meanwhile suggests downside risks have increased in the near-term at least, hinting that the upturn in growth seen in July could prove short-lived and that GDP growth could remain disappointingly modest in 3Q.
"Optimism is at its lowest ebb since comparable data were first available in 2012 as companies have grown increasingly concerned about the year ahead, fueled by trade war worries and wider geopolitical jitters, as well as growing worries that the economic cycle has peaked."

Commenting on the J.P.Morgan Global Composite PMI, Olya Borichevska, from Global Economic Research at J.P.Morgan, said: “The July PMI data tell a story of two diverging sectors. Although the pace of expansion in global economic output and new orders rose to three-month highs, this was mainly driven by improved growth at service providers. In contrast, manufacturers continued to struggle, hit hard by the weakening trend in international trade flows. The outlook also became less positive, with the Future Output Index falling to its lowest level in the series history.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, August 2, 2019

June 2019 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments in June increased $1.9 billion or 0.4% to $506.2 billion. Durable goods shipments increased $3.2 billion or 1.3% to $257.7 billion led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments decreased $1.3 billion or 0.5% to $248.4 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of both wood products and paper rose by +0.3%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $1.3 billion or 0.2% to $695.6 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.37, down from 1.38 in May. Inventories of durable goods increased $1.4 billion or 0.3% to $426.0 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories decreased $0.1 billion or virtually unchanged to $269.6 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of wood products were unchanged; paper: -0.2%. 
Click image for larger view
New orders increased $3.1 billion or 0.6% to $493.8 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders inched up by 0.1% (-1.2% YoY). Durable goods orders increased $4.5 billion or 1.9% to $245.4 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- jumped by 1.5% (+0.1% YoY). New orders for nondurable goods decreased $1.3 billion or 0.5% to $248.4 billion.
As can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders were essentially flat between early 2012 and mid-2014, recouping on average less than 70% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. The recovery in real new orders is back to just 49% of the ground given up in the Great Recession. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders decreased $8.0 billion or 0.7% to $1,160.2 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.53, down from 6.62 in May. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a less positive picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders then jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have been going sideways-to-down.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

July 2019 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey showed non-farm payroll employment rising by 164,000 jobs in June (+156,000 expected). However, combined May and June employment gains were revised down by 41,000 (May: -10,000; June: -31,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) was unchanged at 3.7% despite expansion of the working-age labor force (+370,000) exceeding growth in the number of employed persons (+283,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* The establishment (+164,000 jobs) and household survey results (+283,000 employed) were reasonably correlated. Also, the BLS’s headline estimate does not show significant bias; had average (since 2009) July CES (business birth/death model) and seasonal adjustments been used, job gains might have been bumped to +171,000.
* Manufacturing shed 16,000 jobs in July. That result seems to run counter to the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which expanded at a slower pace in July. Wood Products employment rose by 500 jobs (ISM was unchanged); Paper and Paper Products: +700 (ISM increased); Construction: +4,000 (ISM unreported). 
Click image for larger view
* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) fell (-183,000) to 95.9 million. This metric seems to have leveled off since the latter half of 2018. Meanwhile, the employment-population ratio (EPR) inched up to 60.7%; roughly, then, for every five people being added to the working-age population, three are employed. 
Click image for larger view
* With absolute growth in the labor force nearly double that of the civilian population, the labor force participation rate rose fractionally to 63.0%. Average hourly earnings of all private employees increased by $0.08, to $27.98, resulting in a 3.2% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages rose by $0.04, to $23.46 (+3.3% YoY). Because the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls shrank by 0.1 hour (to 34.3 hours), average weekly earnings decreased by $0.05, to $959.71 (+0.8% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of 1.6% in June, how well workers are maintaining purchasing power depends upon which metric one chooses for comparison. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs jumped by 281,000, to a new record. Those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- slumped by 363,000. Those working part time for non-economic reasons fell by 87,000 while multiple-job holders spiked by 233,000. 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld in July rose by $17.1 billion, to $210.1 billion (+8.8% MoM, and +9.6% YoY). To reduce some of the monthly volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending July was 7.6% above the year-earlier average -- well off the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.