What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Friday, February 21, 2014

January 2014 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1 percent in January. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 1.6 percent before seasonal adjustment. Increases in the indexes for household energy accounted for most of the all items increase. The electricity index posted its largest increase since March 2010, and the indexes for natural gas and fuel oil also rose sharply. These increases more than offset a decline in the gasoline index, resulting in a 0.6 percent increase in the energy index.
The seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index for final demand increased 0.2 percent in January. This advance followed a 0.1 percent rise in December and no change in November. On an unadjusted basis, the index for final demand moved up 1.2 percent for the 12 months ended in January, the largest 12-month advance since a 1.2 percent increase in October 2013.
Click image for larger version
Only one of the price indices we track (Pulp, Paper & Allied Products) declined relative to December. All indices were higher than a year earlier. The indices of Lumber & Wood Products, and Wood Fiber achieved new all-time highs. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2014 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing starts retreated for a second month in January, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 880,000 units. That was 168,000 fewer units (-16.3 percent) than December’s upwardly revised 1.048 million units, and more than 20 percent below November’s peak of 1.101 million units. The single-family component contributed nearly two-thirds of the fall-off (-108,000 units, or -16.0 percent); the multi-family component declined by 60,000 units (-16.3 percent). 
Click image for larger view
With January’s drop, the year-over-year percentage change in total starts fell back nearly to 0 percent. Single-family starts were 3.0 percent below January 2012’s levels; the multi-family component was still “in the black” with +8.3 percent.
Analysts have been debating the degree to which January’s bad weather contributed to starts’ poor showing. In our own opinion, the verdict is unclear. The Northeast, which was certainly impacted by bad weather, saw starts jump on both SA and NSA bases. The Midwest and South declined, as might be expected. However, bad weather does not explain the drop in both SA and NSA starts in the West (much of which was unseasonably warm or dry in January). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions rose modestly (+36,000 units, or 4.6 percent) in January, to 814,000 units SAAR. The increase was about evenly split between the single- and multi-family components (respectively, 17,000 and 19,000 units). Total completions were 13.1 percent above year-earlier levels. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
The most troubling aspect of the Census Bureau’s report came from residential permits. Total permits declined by 54,000 units (-5.4 percent) SAAR in January. The vast majority of the decline occurred in the multi-family component (-46,000 units, or 12.1 percent); single-family permits fell by 8,000 units (-1.3 percent).
Although some blamed the weather for the poor showing in permits, we think that makes little sense. First of all, the biggest drop -- in both the SA and NSA data, and whether on an absolute or percentage basis -- occurred in the comparatively balmy West. Second, permits typically correspond to activity that will occur two or more months in the future. Just because January’s weather may have been unduly inclement does not mean builders expect those adverse conditions to continue.
Third, the rate of growth in permits has been trending down on a year-over-year percentage change basis since late 2012. As of January, permits were essentially unchanged relative to a year earlier. This trend is most readily apparent in the recent erosion of builder confidence. The National Association of Home Builders’ confidence index plummeted by 10 points -- the largest monthly drop in the survey’s history -- into negative sentiment territory during February.
Rather than blaming the weather, we think a more plausible explanation is the construction industry got ahead of itself in late 2013 and needs to take a breather. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, February 17, 2014

February 2014 Macro Pulse -- Blame It on the Weather

A variety of recent data releases have been weaker than expected. In several cases, wintry weather was blamed for the poor showing. For example:

Click here to read the rest of the February 2014 Macro Pulse recap.

The Macro Pulse blog is a commentary about recent economic developments affecting the forest products industry. The monthly Macro Pulse newsletter summarizes the previous 30 days of commentary available on this website.

Friday, February 14, 2014

January 2014 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Industrial production decreased 0.3 percent in January (as opposed to expectations of a 0.2 percent gain) after having risen 0.3 percent in December. In January, manufacturing output fell 0.8 percent, partly because of the severe weather that curtailed production in some regions of the country. Additionally, manufacturing production is now reported to have been lower in the fourth quarter; the index is now estimated to have advanced at an annual rate of 4.6 percent in the fourth quarter rather than 6.2 percent. The output of utilities rose 4.1 percent in January, as demand for heating was boosted by unseasonably cold temperatures. At 101.0 percent of its 2007 average, total industrial production in January was 2.9 percent above its level of a year earlier.
Wood Products output dropped by 2.6 percent while Paper receded by 0.2 percent.
Click image for larger version
Click image for larger version
Click image for larger version
The capacity utilization rate for total industry decreased in January to 78.5 percent, a rate that is 1.6 percentage points below its long-run (1972-2013) average.
Wood Products capacity utilization fell back by 2.9 percent, and Paper by 0.1 percent.
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries and manufacturing levels both moved higher by 0.2 in January. Wood Products capacity jumped by 0.4 percent while Paper contracted by 0.1 percent.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 6, 2014

December 2013 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports decreased by 11 MMBF (6.7 percent) in December while imports fell by 105 MMBF (10.4 percent). Exports were 2 MMBF (1.1 percent) above year-earlier levels; imports were 155 MMBF (21.0 percent) higher. 
Click image for larger view
Asia (especially China and Japan) retained the “top spot” for U.S. softwood lumber exports in December. China was also the largest single-country destination by a wide margin; year to date (YTD), exports to China were up over 61 percent relative to the same period in 2012. Meanwhile, Canada was the overwhelming source of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Imports from Romania, Austria, Estonia, Sweden, Malaysia and Honduras have increased markedly on a YTD-over-YTD change basis. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Just over half of U.S. softwood lumber exports left the country through West Coast (primarily Seattle, WA) customs districts in December. At the same time, Great Lakes customs districts (especially Duluth, MN) handled over two-thirds of the softwood lumber imports coming into the United States
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 23 percent of all softwood lumber exports in December, followed by Douglas-fir with 21 percent.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

December 2013 International Trade (General)

Click image for larger view
Total December exports of $191.3 billion and imports of $230.0 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $38.7 billion, up from $34.6 billion in November. December exports were $3.5 billion less than November exports of $194.8 billion. December imports were $0.6 billion more than November imports of $229.4 billion.
In December, the goods deficit increased $4.6 billion from November to $58.8 billion, and the services surplus increased $0.4 billion from November to $20.1 billion. Exports of goods decreased $4.3 billion to $132.8 billion, and imports of goods increased $0.3 billion to $191.6 billion. Exports of services increased $0.8 billion to $58.5 billion, and imports of services increased $0.3 billion to $38.4 billion.
The goods and services deficit increased $0.4 billion from December 2012 to December 2013. Exports were up $2.6 billion, or 1.4 percent, and imports were up $3.0 billion, or 1.3 percent.
Click image for larger view
On a global scale, data compiled by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis showed that world trade volume increased by 0.2 percent in November while prices fell by 1.2 percent.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.


Wednesday, February 5, 2014

December 2013 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments decreased $1.2 billion or 0.2 percent to $492.7 billion in December. Shipments of durable goods decreased $4.0 billion or 1.7 percent to $233.5 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $2.8 billion or 1.1 percent to $259.2 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Wood shipments fell by 1.7 percent while Paper shipments rose by 0.4 percent.
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $2.9 billion or 0.5 percent to $636.6 billion (the highest level since the series was first published on a NAICS basis). The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.29, up from 1.28 in November.
Inventories of durable goods increased $3.2 billion or 0.8 percent to $387.9 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories decreased $0.3 billion or 0.1 percent to $248.7 billion, led by food products. Wood inventories rose by 1.2 percent; Paper ticked up by 0.1 percent.
Click image for larger view
New orders decreased $7.2 billion or 1.5 percent to $489.2 billion; excluding transportation, new orders increased 0.2 percent. Durable goods orders decreased $10.0 billion or 4.2 percent to $230.0 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for nondurable goods increased $2.8 billion or 1.1 percent to $259.2 billion.
As can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders have been essentially flat since early 2011, and have recouped a little more than two-thirds the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. The trend since early 2013 seems to be on a very modest rising trajectory.
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $3.9 billion or 0.4 percent to a new nominal high of $1,061.7 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.53, up from 6.44 in November. Real unfilled orders, a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders have regained just 60 percent of the ground given up since the Great Recession began.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2014 ISM Reports

Click image for larger version
According to the Institute for Supply Management (ISM), expansion of economic activity in the U.S. manufacturing sector nearly stalled in January. The PMI registered 51.3 percent, a decrease of 5.2 percentage points from December's 56.5 percent (50 percent is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion). “A number of comments from the [respondent] panel cite adverse weather conditions as a factor negatively impacting their businesses in January,” said Bradley Holcomb, chair of ISM’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, “while others reflect optimism and increasing volumes in the early stages of 2014.”
Click image for larger version
Except for input prices and the pace of supplier deliveries (both of which increased faster in January than in December), January’s general manufacturing sub-indices either rose more slowly or contracted more quickly than in December. Most notable is that manufacturers’ and customers’ inventories dropped further in January. This may be signaling the dramatic inventory buildup during 3&4Q2013 is coming to an end; that, in turn, could have adverse implications for 1Q2014 GDP growth. Wood Products expanded in January, as employment and inventory growth apparently more than offset the drop in new orders and shrinking customer inventories. Paper Products contracted, with only production growth bucking the trend.
Growth in the service sector nudged higher in January. The NMI registered 54.0 percent, 1 percentage point higher than December’s 53.0 percent. Except for those related to order backlogs and international trade, service sub-indices rose at a faster pace during January. “The majority of respondents’ comments reflect an improvement in business conditions,” said Anthony Nieves, chair of ISM’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “Some of the respondents indicate that weather conditions have impacted their business. There remains a bit of uncertainty about the overall economy for some of the survey respondents; however, the majority feel positive about continued economic growth.
Click image for larger version
Among the individual service industries we track, only Construction contracted (thanks to declining new orders and employment). Real Estate expanded despite a downturn in new and backlogged orders. Positive support among Ag & Forestry’s sub-indices was more diverse.
Commodities up in price included diesel, lumber, natural gas and wood. Caustic soda was the only relevant commodity down in price. Some respondents indicated paying more for gasoline while others reported paying less.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

January 2014 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil retreated by $3.62 (3.7 percent) in January, falling to $94.06 per barrel. That price decrease coincided with a slightly stronger U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of an increase in oil supplied -- +140,000 barrels per day (BPD) to 19.4 million BPD -- in November, and no appreciable change in crude stocks. The monthly average price spread between Brent crude (the predominant grade used in Europe) and WTI widened by $0.83 in January, to $13.94 per barrel.
Click image for larger view
Click image for larger view
ASPO-USA attributed the recent price increases of near-term contracts to cold weather. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, February 3, 2014

January 2014 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In January the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar appreciated relative to all three major currencies we track: 2.3 percent against Canada’s loonie, 0.7 percent against the yen and 0.6 percent against the euro. On a trade-weighted index basis, the dollar strengthened by 0.8 percent against a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

December 2013 U.S. Construction Spending

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Overall construction spending in the United States increased by 0.1 percent during December, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of $930.5 billion -- the highest level since April 2009. The increase derived entirely from an $8.8 billion (2.6 percent) rise in private residential spending. Public construction spending declined by $6.2 billion (2.3 percent) while the private non-residential component fell by $2.1 billion (0.7 percent).
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of December’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventory and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.