What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Thursday, October 30, 2014

3Q2014 Gross Domestic Product: First (Advance) Estimate

Click image for larger version
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis‘ (BEA) “advance” estimate, 3Q2014 growth in real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) expanded at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of 3.5 percent -- roughly 1.1 percentage points below 2Q’s 4.6 percent. All four categories -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 3Q growth.
For this report the BEA assumed annualized net aggregate inflation of 1.28 percent. By comparison, the growth rate of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ concurrent seasonally adjusted CPI-U index was -0.10 percent (annualized); meanwhile, the price index reported by the Billion Prices Project (BPP) was -0.18 percent. Were the BEA’s nominal estimates corrected for inflation using the CPI-U, real 3Q GDP would have grown by 4.97 percent; if using the BPP inflation rate, growth would have been 5.07 percent.
Among the notable items in the report: 
-- The headline contribution of consumer expenditures for goods was 0.70 percentage point (down 0.63 percentage point from 2Q).
-- The contribution from consumer services spending increased to 0.52 percent (up 0.10 percent). The combined contribution to the headline number by consumers was 1.22 percent (down 0.53 percent).
-- Commercial private fixed investments added 0.74 percent to the headline number (down 0.71 percent), and this continued positive growth continues to be almost exclusively in non-residential construction.
-- Inventories subtracted 0.57 percent from the headline number (down 1.99 percent).
-- Governmental spending was up 0.52 percent, adding 0.83 percent to the headline. The increase was all at the federal level (likely the usual fiscal year-end “use it or lose it” budgetary spending spree by federal agencies); by contrast, growth of state and local spending softened 0.23 percent relative to 2Q.
-- Exports added 1.03 percent to the headline growth rate (down 0.40 percent).
-- Imports added 0.29 to the headline number (a +2.06 percent turnaround from 2Q). The combined quarter-to-quarter impact of foreign trade on the headline number was a significant +1.66 percent.
Growth in real final sales of domestic product, the BEA’s “bottom line” indicator of economic health (which excludes the ever-volatile inventories) jumped to 4.2 percent.
Click image for larger version
Conclusions from this report include:
-- The Federal Reserve’s argument for completing its QE taper was strengthened. An economy growing at 3.54 percent is presumably healthy enough to be “weaned” off central bank stimulus.
-- That said, consumers are not spending as if the economy is healthy. Consumer spending contributed only about one-third of 3Q headline growth despite typically representing over two-thirds of economic activity. Apparently consumers remain wary.
-- Also, the inventory “worm has turned.” It added 1.42 percentage points to 2Q’s headline 4.6 percent but subtracted 0.57 percentage point from 3Q’s 3.5 percent. As we have mentioned many times, this is a line item that over the long haul has been essentially a zero sum series. If it continues to revert to the mean, we could see at least another quarter of negative contribution.
-- The wild card in all of this is reflected in the CPI and BPP numbers: the strengthening of the dollar has created an apparent disinflationary pricing environment for some goods that may be playing havoc with the BEA’s computations for inventories, exports and imports. Imports are also certainly being impacted by the double whammy of increased domestic production and crashing oil prices. In any event, the impact of the strength of the dollar is likely masking to some extent what is happening in the underlying “real” economy.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

September 2014 U.S. Home Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family homes in September edged up by 1,000 units (0.2 percent) relative to the previous month, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 467,000 -- a six-year high. Data for August was revised down from 504,000 to 466,000 units. Sales in September were 22.6 percent above year-earlier levels. Meanwhile, the median price of new homes sold fell $27,800 (-9.7 percent) to $259,000. Although single-family starts rose faster than sales in September, the three-month average ratio of starts to sales dropped to 1.46. Click here for our post on September’s housing permits, starts and completions. 
Click image for larger view
Single-unit completions increased by 6,000 units (1.0 percent) in September. New-home inventory expanded in absolute terms (+3,000 units) but was unchanged in months-of-inventory terms. 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales advanced in September, by 120,000 units (2.4 percent) to 5.17 million units (SAAR). With sales of new homes flat and existing homes rising, the share of total sales comprised of new homes slipped back to 8.3 percent. The median price of previously owned homes sold in September dropped again (by $8,700 or -4.0 percent) to $209,700. Inventory of existing homes inched lower in both absolute (-30,000 units) and months-of-inventory terms (0.2 month). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability improved marginally in August because the median price of existing homes for sale fell by $1,900 to $220,600. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the newly published U.S. National Index in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.2 percent in August (+5.1 percent relative to a year earlier).
“The deceleration in home prices continues,” said David Blitzer, Chair of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “The Sun Belt region reported its worst annual returns since 2012, led by weakness in all three California cities -- Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego. Despite the weaker year-over-year numbers, home prices are still showing an overall increase, as the National Index increased for its eighth consecutive month.
“The large extent of slower increases is seen in the annual figures with all 20 cities; the two composites and the national index all revealing lower numbers than last month. The 10- and 20-City Composites gained 5.5 percent and 5.6 percent annually with prices nationally rising at a slower pace of 5.1 percent. Las Vegas continues to see a sharp deceleration in their annual home prices with a 10.1 percent annual return, down just below 3 percent from last month. Miami is now leading the cities with a 10.5 percent year-over-year return. San Francisco, which has shown double-digit annual gains since November 2012, posted an annual return of 9.0 percent in August.
“Despite softer price data, other housing data perked up. September figures for housing starts, permits and sales of existing homes were all up. New home sales and builders’ confidence were weaker. Continued labor market gains, low interest rates and slower increases in home prices should support further improvements in housing. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, October 24, 2014

September 2014 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.1 percent in September. Increases in shelter and food indexes outweighed declines in energy indexes to result in the seasonally adjusted all items increase. The food index rose 0.3 percent as five of the six major grocery store food group indexes increased. The energy index declined 0.7 percent as the indexes for gasoline, electricity, and fuel oil all fell. 
The all items index increased 1.7 percent over the last 12 months, the same increase as for the 12 months ending August. The 12-month change in the index for all items less food and energy also remained at 1.7 percent. The 12-month change in the shelter index has been gradually increasing, and reached 3.0 percent for the first time since January 2008. The food index has also risen 3.0 percent over the span, while the energy index has declined 0.6 percent.
The seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) decreased 0.1 percent in September. Final demand prices were unchanged in August and advanced 0.1 percent in July. On an unadjusted basis, the index for final demand increased 1.6 percent for the 12 months ended in September.
In September, the 0.1 percent decrease in final demand prices can be traced to the indexes for both goods and services, which moved down 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively. The decline in goods was led by prices for final demand energy, which fell 0.7 percent (especially gasoline, which dropped 2.6 percent). The index for final demand foods also decreased 0.7 percent. In contrast, prices for final demand goods less foods and energy advanced 0.2 percent.  
Click image for larger version
The price indices we track were either unchanged or rose in September (relative to August). Compared to a year earlier, all indices were higher. The indices for both Wood Fiber and Lumber & Wood Products set new highs. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

September 2014 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing starts advanced in September, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 1.017 million units. That level was 60,000 more (6.3 percent) than August’s 957,000 units. Nearly nine-tenths of the increase in total starts occurred in the multi-family component (53,000 units or 16.7 percent); single-family starts rose by 7,000 units (1.1 percent). 
Click image for larger view
Unsurprisingly, the year-over-year percentage change in total starts also rose in September, to 18.9 percent. Single-family starts were 11.8 percent above their year-earlier level; the more volatile multi-family component jumped to 32.5 percent above its September 2013 level. 
Click image for larger view
Click image for larger view
Completions increased by 79,000 units (8.6 percent) in September, to 999,000 units SAAR. Over nine-tenths of the increase occurred in the multi-family component (73,000 units or 24.2 percent), as the single-family component increased by just 6,000 units (1.0 percent). Total completions were 33.1 percent above their year-earlier level. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits increased by 15,000 units (1.5 percent), to 1.018 million SAAR in September. The increase occurred entirely in the multi-family component (+18,000 units or 4.8 percent). Single-family permits inched lower (-3,000 units or 0.5 percent). Total permits were 7.8 percent above year-earlier levels; single- and multi-family components were, respectively, 6.3 and 10.1 percent higher.
It appears the slide in the rate of annual growth in total permits seen since late 2012 has come to an end, but it is still too early to tell whether the trend is poised to turn back up. That may be the case, although the latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) fell five points in October (to 54), ending a four-month run of gains. An index value above 50 means more builders feel the market is good than feel it is poor.
“After the HMI posted a nine-year high in September, it’s not surprising to see the number drop in October,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “However, historically low mortgage interest rates, steady job gains, and significant pent up demand all point to continued growth of the housing market.”
Based on the observation that not-seasonally adjusted completions exceeded permits in September, Global Economic Intersection’s Steven Hansen believes potential for future growth in the housing sector is limited. Also, “whenever permits rate of growth is lower than completions,” Hansen wrote, “this industry is decelerating” (emphasis added). 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

September 2014 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Industrial production increased 1.0 percent in September and advanced at an annual rate of 3.2 percent in 3Q2014, roughly its average quarterly increase since the end of 2010. In September, manufacturing output moved up 0.5 percent, while the index for utilities climbed 3.9 percent. For 3Q as a whole, manufacturing production rose at an annual rate of 3.5 percent, but the output of utilities fell at an annual rate of 8.5 percent for a second consecutive quarterly decline. At 105.1 percent of its 2007 average, total industrial production in September was 4.3 percent above its level of a year earlier.
Wood Products output fell by 0.8 percent while Paper rose 0.2 percent. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Click image for larger version
The capacity utilization rate for total industry moved up 0.6 percentage point in September to 79.3 percent, a rate that is 1.0 percentage point above its level of 12 months earlier but 0.8 percentage point below its long-run (1972-2013) average; Wood Products fell by 1.3 percent, but Paper rose by 0.4 percent. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries and manufacturing levels moved higher by, respectively, 0.3 and 0.2 percent. Wood Products extended its year-long trend when increasing by 0.4 percent. Paper, on the other hand, contracted by 0.2 percent to another new low.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, October 6, 2014

October 2014 Macro Pulse -- Behind the Headlines

The macroeconomic headlines published during the past month were generally upbeat. The most obvious example was the revision of 2Q2014 real GDP growth to 4.6 percent -- the best quarter-to-quarter improvement since 2Q2000, and the second best since the 2Q1982. Other positives included the addition of 248,000 non-farm jobs in September (with the prior two months revised up by 69,000 jobs), and the unemployment rate’s 0.2 percentage point drop to 5.9 percent. Of course, recent data releases were not universally positive, however. For example, …
Click here to read the rest of the October 2014 Macro Pulse recap.

The Macro Pulse blog is a commentary about recent economic developments affecting the forest products industry. The monthly Macro Pulse newsletter summarizes the previous 30 days of commentary available on this website.

Saturday, October 4, 2014

August 2014 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports decreased by 3 MMBF (2.0 percent) in August while imports fell by 80 MMBF (7.2 percent). Exports were 12 MMBF (7.7 percent) below year-earlier levels; imports were 140 MMBF (15.7 percent) higher. 
Click image for larger view
The rest of North America (i.e., Canada and Mexico) was the primary destination for U.S. softwood lumber exports in August, although Asia (especially China and Japan) was a close second; Canada was also the largest single-country destination. Year to date (YTD), exports to China were up over 21 percent relative to the same period in 2013. Meanwhile, Canada was the overwhelming source of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Overall, YTD exports were up 5.8 percent compared to the same period in 2013, while imports were up 9.2 percent. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Roughly 47 percent of U.S. softwood lumber exports left the country through West Coast (primarily Seattle, WA) customs districts in August. At the same time, Great Lakes customs districts (especially Duluth, MN) handled over 69 percent of the softwood lumber imports coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 21.5 percent of all softwood lumber exports in August, followed by Douglas-fir with 20.3 percent.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, October 3, 2014

August 2014 International Trade (General)

Click image for larger view
Total August exports of $198.5 billion and imports of $238.6 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $40.1 billion, down from $40.3 billion in July. August exports were $0.4 billion more than July exports of $198.0 billion. August imports were $0.2 billion more than July imports of $238.3 billion.
In August, the goods deficit increased $0.1 billion from July to $59.9 billion, and the services surplus increased $0.3 billion from July to $19.8 billion. Exports of goods increased $0.1 billion to $138.8 billion, and imports of goods increased $0.1 billion to $198.7 billion. Exports of services increased $0.4 billion to $59.6 billion, and imports of services increased $0.1 billion to $39.9 billion.
The goods and services deficit increased $0.6 billion from August 2013 to August 2014. Exports were up $7.9 billion, or 4.1 percent, and imports were up $8.4 billion, or 3.7 percent.
As MarketWatch explained, however, the smaller trade deficit is thanks to oil exports:
The U.S. exported a record $14.1 billion in petroleum products and imported the least amount, $27.2 billion, since late 2010.
As a result, the nation’s petroleum deficit dropped in August to the lowest level in 10 years.
Oil production is surging in the U.S. because technologies such as fracking are allowing companies to tap reserves previously inaccessible.
Yet excluding petroleum, the U.S. trade deficit rose to $45.1 billion to mark the highest level in three months, mainly because of higher imports. Cheaper foreign currencies and a stronger dollar are enabling Americans to more easily afford foreign goods.
Click image for larger view
On a global scale, data compiled by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis showed that world trade volume increased by 1.4 percent in July (from the prior month) while prices fell by 0.3 percent.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

September 2014 ISM Reports

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly opinion survey showed that expansion of economic activity in the U.S. manufacturing sector stumbled in September. The PMI fell back to 56.6 percent, a decrease of 2.4 percentage points from August’s 59.0 percent (50 percent is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion). ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10 percent of U.S. employment and about 20 percent of the overall economy. All of the sub-indices weakened except for Production and Input Prices.
Nonetheless, Bradley Holcomb, chair of ISM’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee said that “comments from the panel reflect a generally positive business outlook, while noting some labor shortages and continuing concern over geopolitical unrest.”
Click image for larger version
There was fairly wide-spread support among the sub-indices for the expansion in both Wood and Paper Products during September. Although one Paper Products respondent observed, “Outlook is very good; demand seems to be growing,” declining employment and new export orders present some potential future downside risks.
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80 percent of the economy and 90 percent of employment -- also retreated in September. The NMI registered 58.6 percent, 1.0 percentage point lower than August’s 59.6 percent; the drop appears to have been primarily concentrated in the New Orders and Orders Backlog sub-indices. “Respondents’ comments indicate that business seems to be leveling off and there is a slight slowing in the momentum of the past few months of strong growth,” said Anthony Nieves, chair of ISM’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. Even so, “they continue to remain optimistic about business conditions and the overall direction of the economy.”
Click image for larger version
Two of the three service industries we track reported expansion in September, although only Construction had meaningful support among the sub-indices. “In the building industry there continues to be a lot of remodeling and smaller additions with replacement facilities and new buildings lagging,” wrote one Construction respondent. “Many companies would like to build new, but are still concerned about making the large investment at this time.”
Commodities up in price included lumber and paper products. Some respondents indicated paying more for fuel, others less. No relevant commodities were in short supply.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, October 2, 2014

August 2014 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments decreased $5.0 billion or 1.0 percent to $503.1 billion in August. Shipments of durable goods decreased $4.0 billion or 1.6 percent to $245.9 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments decreased $1.0 billion or 0.4 percent to $257.2 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Wood and Paper shipments rose by 1.0 and 0.2 percent, respectively. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $0.8 billion or 0.1 percent to $653.9 billion (the highest level since the series was first published on a NAICS basis). The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.30, up from 1.29 in July.
Inventories of durable goods increased $1.7 billion or 0.4 percent to $403.1 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories decreased $0.9 billion or 0.3 percent to $250.8 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of Wood expanded by 0.1 percent, while Paper was unchanged. 
Click image for larger view
New orders decreased $56.1 billion or 10.1 percent to $502.0 billion, more than reversing July’s biggest month-over-month rise on record. Excluding transportation, new orders decreased 0.1 percent -- the third drop in the last four months. Durable goods orders decreased $55.1 billion or 18.4 percent to $244.8 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for nondurable goods decreased $1.0 billion or 0.4 percent to $257.2 billion.
Prior to July, as can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders had been essentially flat since early 2012, recouping roughly 75 percent of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. With July’s transportation-led spike now in the rearview mirror, new orders have dropped back to around 73 percent or their December 2007 high. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $7.0 billion or 0.6 percent to $1,164.5 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.71, up from 6.62 in July. Real unfilled orders, a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June were back to just 79 percent of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders jumped to 102 percent of the prior peak in July, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders, and are likely to keep this metric elevated for several years.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

September 2014 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil extended its retreat for a third month, falling $3.23 to $93.31 per barrel. That price drop coincided with a notably stronger U.S. dollar and the lagged impacts of a 331,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) increase in the amount of oil supplied in July (to 19.2 million BPD), but occurred despite a continued downward trend in crude oil stocks. The monthly average price spread between Brent crude (the predominant grade used in Europe) and WTI narrowed by $1.17 in September, to $3.90 per barrel. 
Click image for larger view
Click image for larger view
“In general the drop in oil prices is being driven by what is perceived to be too much oil chasing too few buyers,” wrote ASPO-USA’s Tom Whipple. “Economies are sagging in the EU and China. U.S. demand is up a bit though not that strong. Credit Suisse says that production cuts are necessary to shore up oil prices. The outlook seems to be that still lower prices are ahead (Iran expects $90/barrel oil by March). If this should happen several crude exporting countries will have trouble keeping their budgets in balance and some U.S. shale oil producers will have trouble making a profit.”
News that Saudi Arabia is cutting its selling price seems to support Whipple’s prediction. “We consider that absent a supply disruption in Iraq, crude prices are likely to remain at subdued levels over the medium term as supply growth exceeds demand growth,” agreed National Australia Bank economist Phin Ziebell. However, “given that crude futures are already at their multiyear lows, we see limited downside risk to prices at this juncture,” said Barnabas Gan, an analyst at Singapore’s OCBC Bank, “especially as geopolitical risk-premiums may have already been substantially narrowed.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

August 2014 U.S. Construction Spending

Click image for larger view
Click image for larger view
Overall construction spending in the United States fell by 0.8 percent during August (well below expectations of a 0.5 percent increase), to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of $961.0 billion. The private non-residential category led the decrease on both absolute (-$5 billion) and percentage (-1.4 percent) bases. Also, July’s increase was lowered to 1.2 percent (from the initial +1.8 percent estimate). 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of August’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.