What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Tuesday, August 30, 2016

July 2016 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in July 2016 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 654,000 units -- well above expectations of 580,000. This was 12.4 percent (±12.7%)* above the revised June rate of 582,000 (originally 592,000 units) and 31.3 percent (±19.9%) above the July 2015 SAAR of 498,000; the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +32.6%. For a longer-term perspective, July’s sales were 53% below the “bubble” peak and 9% above the long-term, pre-2000 average.
Because single-family starts were essentially flat in July while sales increased, the three-month average ratio of starts to sales dropped to 1.26 -- below above the average (1.41) since January 1995.
The median sales price of new houses sold in July 2016 fell by $15,900 to $294,600; the average sales price was $355,800 (+$2,300). Starter homes (those priced below $200,000) made up 17.5% of the total sold in July, the lowest proportion on record for that calendar month (going back to 2002); prior to the Great Recession starter homes comprised as much as 61% of total sales.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in July, single-unit completions declined by 3,000 units (-0.4%). Because completions decreased while sales rose, new-home inventory shrank in both absolute (-7,000 units) and months of inventory (-0.6 month) terms. 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales plummeted by 180,000 units (-3.2%) in July to 5.39 million units (SAAR), below expectations of 5.52 million. Inventory of existing homes expanded in both absolute (+20,000 units) and months-of-inventory (+0.2 month) terms. Because new-home sales jumped while existing-home sales decreased, the share of total sales comprised of new homes rose to 10.8% -- breaking through 10% for the first time in nearly eight years. The median price of previously owned homes sold in July retreated by $3,500 (-1.4%), to $244,100. 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability deteriorated as the median price of existing homes for sale in June increased by another $9,500 (+4.0%; +5.0 YoY) to a new record $249,800. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +1.0% (+5.1% YoY).
 “Home prices continued to rise across the country led by the west and the south,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “In the strongest region, the Pacific Northwest, prices are rising at more than 10%; in the slower Northeast, prices are climbing a bit faster than inflation. Nationally, home prices have risen at a consistent 4.8% annual pace over the last two years without showing any signs of slowing.
“Overall, residential real estate and housing is in good shape. Sales of existing homes are at running at about 5.5 million units annually with inventory levels under five months, indicating a fairly tight market. Sales of new single family homes were at a 654,000 seasonally adjusted annual rate in July, the highest rate since November 2007. Housing starts in July topped an annual rate of 1.2 million units. While the real estate sector and consumer spending are contributing to economic growth, business capital spending continues to show weakness.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

2Q2016 Gross Domestic Product: Second (Preliminary) Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its second (“preliminary”) estimate of 2Q2016 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) revised growth of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +1.09%, down -0.12 percentage point from the 2Q estimate released in July but +0.26% from 1Q2016. Moreover, 2Q2016’s year-over-year growth rate was +1.20%, slower than 1Q2016’s +1.57%. After missing badly in July (+2.6% expected versus +1.21% “actual”), consensus expectations were “spot on” in August.
Overall, groupings of GDP components show that personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and net exports (NetX) contributed to 2Q growth. Private domestic investment (PDI) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) detracted from it.
None of the revisions was statistically significant, with the largest line item (GCE) change only -0.11% compared to the report released in July. This report confirmed the ongoing trend of commercial weakness offset by consumer spending growth. This estimate reported continued slow contraction in commercial fixed investment (-0.42%), inventories (-1.26%) and governmental spending (-0.27%). Meanwhile consumer spending on goods (+1.52% growth) and services (+1.42%) remained strong. 
Click image for larger version
Consumer Metrics Institute again provided a fairly terse summary:
Arguably this report was merely statistical noise. It continued to show a US economy moving forward, but with a decidedly lack-luster 1.09% growth rate.
The key items in this report:
-- All things not consumer either weakened or remained in contraction.
-- Consumer spending growth improved yet again, with most of that coming from savings.
-- All of the reported growth disappears when a third party deflator (the BLS CPI-U) is applied to the data.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, August 18, 2016

July 2016 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) was unchanged in July (0.0% expected) after rising in each of the four previous months. After rising in each of the last four months, the energy index fell 1.6% due to a sharp decrease in the gasoline index (-5.5%); other energy indexes were mixed. The index for all items less food and energy rose, but posted its smallest increase since March.
The all items index rose 0.8% for the 12 months ending July, a smaller increase than the 1.0% rise for the 12 months ending June. Similarly, the index for all items less food and energy rose 2.2% for the 12 months ending July, a smaller increase than the 2.3% rise for the 12 months ending June. Rents rose by 3.8% YoY for a third consecutive month, the fastest pace since 2008; medical care services: +4.1% YoY.
The seasonally adjusted producer price index for final demand (PPI) decreased 0.4% in July (+0.1% expected), led by final demand services (-0.3%). The index for final demand goods decreased 0.4%.
The final demand index moved down 0.2% for the 12 months ended in July. Prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services were unchanged in July after rising 0.3% in June. For the 12 months ended in July, the index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services increased 0.8%.
Final Demand
Final demand services: The index for final demand services fell 0.3% in July, the largest decline since moving down 0.3% in March. The July decrease can be traced to margins for final demand trade services, which fell 1.3%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) Conversely, prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing advanced 0.2%, and the index for final demand transportation and warehousing services increased 0.1%.
Product detail: Nearly 60% of the decrease in prices for final demand services is attributable to margins for apparel, jewelry, footwear, and accessories retailing, which fell 6.0%. The indexes for machinery and equipment wholesaling; health, beauty, and optical goods retailing; food retailing; loan services (partial); and automotive fuels and lubricants retailing also declined. In contrast, prices for traveler accommodation services climbed 3.9%. The indexes for chemicals and allied products wholesaling and for securities brokerage, dealing, investment advice, and related services also moved higher.
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods declined 0.4% in July following three straight increases. Almost half of the decrease can be traced to prices for final demand foods, which fell 1.1%. The index for final demand energy moved down 1.0%. Prices for final demand goods less foods and energy were unchanged.
Product detail: A major factor in the decrease in the index for final demand goods was prices for beef and veal, which fell 9.8%. Prices for gasoline, corn, motor vehicles, oilseeds, and iron and steel scrap also moved lower. Conversely, the index for utility natural gas advanced 4.3%. Prices for eggs for fresh use and nonferrous scrap also increased. 
Click image for larger version
All of the not-seasonally adjusted price indexes we track rose on a MoM basis; YoY comparisons were mixed. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

July 2016 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 1.211 million units in July (1.180 million expected). That was 2.1 percent (±8.8%)* above the revised June estimate of 1.186 million (originally 1.189 million units). The multi-family component led the increase: +21,000 units (+5.0%); single-family starts rose by 4,000 units, or 0.5 percent (±8.6%)* above the revised June figure of 766,000.
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view
July’s total SAAR was 5.6 percent (±14.7%)* above the July 2015 SAAR of 1.147 million; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was +6.3%. Single-family starts were 1.3% higher YoY, and the multi-family component was +16.7%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total completions fell by 93,000 units, or 8.3 percent (±8.9%)*, to 1.026 million. That was 3.2 percent (±11.2%)* above the July 2015 SAAR of 994,000; the NSA comparison: +1.6% YoY.
Single-family housing completions were at a SAAR of 743,000 or 0.4 percent (±8.8%)* below the revised June rate of 746,000; multi-family completions slumped up by 24.1% MoM. Single-family completions were 17.3% above their year-earlier level; multi-family: -22.2% YoY. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits decreased by 1,000 units or 0.1 percent (±1.2%)* below the revised June rate of 1.153 million. That estimate was 0.9 percent (±1.5%)* above the July 2015 SAAR of 1.142 million; the NSA comparison was -7.2% YoY.
The MoM decline was entirely a function of the single-family component: 3.7 percent (±1.4%) below the revised June figure of 738,000. On a YoY basis, single-family permits were 7.4% lower, and the multi-family component was -6.7%; multi-family permits were also 18.0% lower YTD through July than the same months in 2015. 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly constructed single-family homes in August rose two points to 60 from a downwardly revised reading of 58 in July on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index.
“New construction and new home sales are on the rise in most areas of the country, and this is helping to boost builder sentiment,” said NAHB Chairman Ed Brady.
“Builder confidence remains solid in the aftermath of weak GDP reports that were offset by positive job growth in July,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz.  “Historically low mortgage rates, increased household formations and a firming labor market will help keep housing on an upward path during the rest of the year.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

July 2016 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) rose 0.7% in July (+0.3% expected) after moving up 0.4% in June. The advance in July was the largest for the index since November 2014. Manufacturing output increased 0.5% in July for its largest gain since July 2015. The index for utilities rose 2.1% as a result of warmer-than-usual weather in July boosting demand for air conditioning. The output of mining moved up 0.7%; the index has increased modestly, on net, over the past three months after having fallen about 17% between December 2014 and April 2016. At 104.9% of its 2012 average, total IP in July was 0.5% lower than its year-earlier level.
Industry Groups
Manufacturing output rose 0.5% in July, and production was 0.2% above its level of a year earlier. In July, durables, nondurables, and other manufacturing (publishing and logging) all recorded gains of about 0.5%. Among durables, increases of more than 1% occurred in motor vehicles and parts, wood products (+1.3%), and miscellaneous goods. Within nondurables, petroleum and coal products, chemicals, and plastics and rubber products posted gains of 0.8% or higher, while printing and support activities registered the only decrease of more than 1%; paper edged down by 0.1%.
The index for mining moved up 0.7% in July, with declines in oil and gas extraction more than offset by increases in the indexes for oil well drilling and servicing and for coal. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector increased 0.5 percentage point in July to 75.9%, a rate that is 4.1 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2015) average.
Manufacturing CU increased 0.4 percentage point in July to 75.4%, a rate that is 3.1 percentage points below its long-run average. The operating rate for durables moved up 0.4 percentage point (wood products: +0.9%); the rates for nondurables and for other manufacturing (publishing and logging) also increased, each gaining 0.3 percentage point (paper: 0.0%). The operating rate for mining moved up 0.8 percentage point to 74.9%, and the rate for utilities rose 1.6 percentage points to 81.0%. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries level was unchanged (+0.6% YoY) at 138.2% of 2012 output. Manufacturing edged up +0.1% (+0.8% YoY) to 137.7%. Wood products extended the upward trend that has been ongoing since November 2013 when increasing by 0.4% (+4.7% YoY) to 167.5%. Paper edged down 0.1% (-0.9% YoY) to 116.7%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, August 8, 2016

June 2016 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports increased (+13 MMBF or 9.7%) in June while imports fell (-177 MMBF or 11.2%). Exports were 9 MMBF (6.5%) above year-earlier levels; imports were 235 MMBF (19.7%) higher. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 226 MMBF (21.3%) larger. The average net export deficit for the 12 months ending June 2016 was 29.7% higher than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above). 
Click image for larger view
North America was the primary destination for U.S. softwood lumber exports in June (41.1%, of which Canada: 21.3%; Mexico: 19.9%). Asia (especially China: 15.5%) ranked second, with 30.7%. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were up 11.5% relative to the same months in 2015. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of nearly all (96.1%) softwood lumber imports into the United States. After a brief burst in May that rocketed it to the #2 spot YTD (from #26 in 2015, France has subsequently fallen to the #3 spot. Overall, YTD exports were down 0.1% compared to 2015, while imports were up 38.0%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
U.S. softwood lumber export activity through West Coast customs districts represented the largest proportion in June (35.0% of the U.S. total), although the Eastern and Gulf districts were not far behind (33.1% and 25.2%, respectively); Seattle maintained its dominance as the most active export district (22.6% of the U.S. total). At the same time, Great Lakes customs districts handled 67.0% of the softwood lumber imports -- most notably Duluth, MN (28.1%) -- coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 33.5% of all softwood lumber exports in June, followed by Douglas-fir with 12.5%. Southern pine exports were up 11.6% YTD relative to 2015, while Doug-fir exports were down 15.7%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

June 2016 International Trade (General)

Click image for larger view
The goods and services deficit was $44.5 billion in June, up $3.6 billion from $41.0 billion in May, revised.  June exports were $183.2 billion, $0.6 billion more than May exports. June imports were $227.7 billion, $4.2 billion more than May imports.
The June increase in the goods and services deficit reflected an increase in the goods deficit of $3.8 billion to $66.0 billion and an increase in the services surplus of $0.3 billion to $21.5 billion.
Year-to-date, the goods and services deficit decreased $5.8 billion, or 2.3 percent, from the same period in 2015. Exports decreased $54.2 billion or 4.7 percent. Imports decreased $60.0 billion or 4.3 percent.
Goods by Selected Countries and Areas: Monthly
The June figures show surpluses, in billions of dollars, with Hong Kong ($2.6), South and Central America ($2.3), Singapore ($0.4), and Brazil ($0.4). Deficits were recorded, in billions of dollars, with China ($28.0), European Union ($12.7), Japan ($6.0), Germany ($5.6), Mexico ($4.7), South Korea ($2.5),  Italy ($2.3), India ($2.0), France ($1.6), OPEC ($1.2), Taiwan ($1.1), Canada ($0.6), Saudi Arabia ($0.5), and United Kingdom ($0.2).
* The deficit with Japan increased $1.0 billion to $6.0 billion in June. Exports decreased $0.4 billion to $5.0 billion and imports increased $0.6 billion to $11.0 billion.
* The deficit with the European Union increased $0.8 billion to $12.7 billion in June. Exports increased $0.9 billion to $22.9 billion and imports increased $1.7 billion to $35.6 billion.
* The deficit with Mexico decreased $0.8 billion to $4.7 billion in June. Exports increased $0.3 billion to $19.0 billion and imports decreased $0.5 billion to $23.7 billion. 
Click image for larger view
On a global scale, data compiled by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis showed that world trade volume decreased 0.4% in May (+0.8% year-over-year) while prices declined by less than 0.1% (-6.8% YoY). May’s price index was 22.1% below the August 2011 peak; price index changes are almost perfectly correlated with changes in the value of the U.S. dollar.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, August 5, 2016

July 2016 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment added to June’s gain when rising by 255,000 jobs, significantly more than even the upper end of expectations (+215,000; consensus: 185,000). Combined May and June employment gains were upwardly revised by 18,000 (May: +13,000; June: +5,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) held steady at 4.9% as those who found employment (+420,000) were nearly matched by growth of the labor force (+407,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* A number of analysts (e.g., Mitsubishi UFJ strategist John Herrmann) claimed the jobs headline “overstates” the strength of payrolls, and that the BLS had applied a “very benign seasonal adjustment factor…to transform a [middling] gain into a strong gain.” Admittedly, we are somewhat skeptical of the jobs report whenever either imputed jobs from the CES (birth/death model) adjustment represent a substantial proportion of the headline number or when seasonal adjustments “swamp” the reported total. However, despite an outsized CES adjustment (roughly 2½ times the July average between 2009 and 2015), seasonal adjustments to both the establishment and household surveys were not out of line with past years.
* Manufacturing gained 9,000 jobs in July. That result is inconsistent with the behavior of the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing employment sub-index, which resumed contracting after a one-month reprieve in June. Wood Products lost 1,400 jobs, and Paper and Paper Products employment dropped by 1,500.
* Mining and logging shed 7,000 jobs, with 3,000 coming from support activities for mining and another 2,000 from oil and gas extraction. Construction employment jumped by 14,000.
* Over 76% (165,700) of July’s private-sector job growth occurred in the sectors typically associated with the lowest-paid jobs -- Retail Trade: +14,700; Professional & Business Services: +70,000 (of which Temp Help comprised 17,000); Education & Health Services: +36,000; and Leisure & Hospitality: +45,000. This is a persistent issue, as we have repeatedly highlighted: There are over 1.4 million fewer manufacturing jobs today than at the start of the Great Recession in December 2007, but nearly 1.7 million more Food Services & Drinking Places (i.e., wait staff and bartender) jobs. In fact, Manufacturing has gained only 11,000 jobs since 2014 while FS&D jobs have expanded by 487,400. 
Click image for larger view
* The employment-population ratio edged up to 59.7 %; roughly speaking, for every five people added to the population, only three are employed. Meanwhile, the number of employment-age persons not in the labor force fell by 184,000 -- but remained over 94.3 million. 
Click image for larger view
* As a result of new and/or re-entrants to the labor force, the labor force participation rate (LFPR) also ticked up to 62.8%, comparable to levels seen in the late-1970s. Average hourly earnings of all private employees increased by $0.08 (to $25.69), resulting in a 2.6% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages rose by $0.07, to $21.59 (+2.6% YoY). With the CPI running at an official rate of +1.0% YoY, in theory wages are rising in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. The average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls inched up 0.1 hour, to 34.5 hours. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs rose by 306,000 while those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- increased by 97,000. There are now 2.0 million more full-time jobs than the pre-recession high; for perspective, however, the non-institutional, working-age civilian population has risen by nearly 20.5 million). PTER employment, by contrast, stopped declining in October 2015 and has since been oscillating around 6 million. 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld in July decreased by $3.1 billion, to $177.5 billion; that is also -1.0% YoY. To reduce some of the volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending June was 3.1% above the year-earlier average, well off the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

June 2016 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments increased $3.1 billion or 0.7% to $460.0 billion in June. Shipments of durable goods increased $1.0 billion or 0.4% to $232.4 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $2.2 billion or 1.0% to $227.6 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of Wood declined (-0.7%) but Paper rose (+0.1%). 
Click image for larger view
Inventories decreased $0.5 billion or 0.1% to $619.1 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.35, down from 1.36 in May. Inventories of durable goods decreased $1.0 billion or 0.3% to $381.3 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories increased $0.5 billion or 0.2% to $237.9 billion, led by chemical products. Inventories of Wood expanded (+0.7%) while Paper contracted (-0.2%). 
Click image for larger view
New orders decreased $6.9 billion or 1.5% to $447.4 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders increased 0.4% (but -4.2% YoY -- the 20th consecutive month of year-over-year contractions). Durable goods orders decreased $9.0 billion or 3.9% to $219.8 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for nondurable goods increased $2.2 billion or 1.0% to $227.6 billion. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- rose by 0.4% (-4.0% YoY). Business investment spending has contracted on a YoY basis during all but two months since January 2015.
Prior to July 2014, as can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders had been essentially flat since early 2012, recouping on average 70% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. With July 2014’s transportation-led spike gradually receding in the rearview mirror, the recovery in new orders is back to just 41% of the ground given up in the Great Recession. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders decreased $9.6 billion or 0.8% to $1,128.0 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.81, down from 6.89 in May. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders jumped to 122% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have moved mostly sideways; not only are they back below the December 2008 peak, but they are also diverging further below the January 2010-to-June 2014 trend line.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

July 2016 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil retreated in July, falling by $4.11 (-8.4%), to $44.65 per barrel. The price decrease coincided with a slightly stronger U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 62,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) decrease in the amount of oil supplied/demanded in May (to 19.2 million BPD), and essentially no change in accumulated oil stocks. The monthly average price spread between Brent crude (the predominant grade used in Europe) and WTI right-sided in July -- i.e., Brent’s price was $0.30 per barrel higher than WTI. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Commentary from ASPO-USA’s Peak Oil Review editor Tom Whipple:
“Oil prices fell steadily during July as the realities of oversupply trumped traders' hopes that there would be balanced markets and higher prices later this year.  July opened with London trading just below $51 a barrel and New York around $49.50. By month's end, London was down to $42.71 and New York to $40.74. The month's trading was dominated by reports of increasing oil product inventories and higher OPEC production. The decline of nearly $10 a barrel naturally has had repercussions across the oil industry. For most of July, the U.S. rig count was growing as drillers anticipated that crude prices would soon be at a level where more wells would be profitable. By month's end, however, these hopes had been dashed, and the U.S. oil rig count had nearly stopped growing….
“For the immediate future, most analysts are talking about further price declines with a few predicting $30 oil again. The issue of space to store excess oil is being discussed more frequently. As the summer driving and cooling season draws to a close, oil stockpiles traditionally increase. Now with both a growing oil and oil product glut, reports of more crude and oil products sitting around on tankers continue to increase. With only the OECD countries making an effort to track how much oil there is in storage, this leaves the actual storage situation in much of the world, especially Russia and China, an unknown.  If oil prices are depressed to an unexpectedly low level in the next year, the lack of storage space may be the cause.
“While high-cost U.S. shale oil production may be jumping up and down with prices and the willingness of investors to pump money into unprofitable shale oil drilling companies, production in much of the world remains strong. In low-cost conventional oil producing nations, such as in Saudi Arabia, the Gulf Arab states, Iraq, and Iran, there is determination to keep pumping to maintain market share. [Or, in the case of Saudi Arabia, at least, perhaps a desire to get oil out of the ground “while the getting’s good.”] So much has been invested in the large and very expensive deep-sea production platforms that there is little incentive to stop work, so considerably more oil is expected to be coming from these projects in the next year or so no matter what oil is selling for.  There are at least 15 large-scale offshore projects expected to come online in the next year producing a combined 1.6 million b/d of crude. This is enough to offset outages in unstable producers and to meet anticipated increases in demand.
Click here to read the rest of Whipple’s article. 
Click image for larger view
Commentary and some news items from OilPrice Intelligence Report editor Evan Kelly follow:
“July saw the worst monthly loss for oil prices so far in 2016 and crude started off August right where they left off in July: oil prices sank 4 percent on Monday. WTI and Brent sank on Monday, briefly dipping below $40 per barrel before closing just above that key psychological threshold. The price declines technically pushed oil into bear market territory.”
Speculators grow more pessimistic. Hedge funds and money managers increased their short bets on crude oil, and sold off their long positions. In fact, hedge funds increased their short bets for the week ending on July 26 by the most ever. "The flow is solidly bearish," Tim Evans, an energy analyst at Citi Futures Perspective, told Bloomberg. "It reflects a recognition that the market is, at least for the time being, oversupplied." John Kilduff, founding partner of Again Capital, says oil is going to $35.
Shale drillers won't return until $60. Bloomberg reports that despite the nascent rebound in the rig count, many top shale drillers won't return to the shale patch in a big way until oil prices rise to $60 per barrel. That is a safer price zone than the $50 per barrel that many had signaled they would be willing to live with. Bloomberg cites Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE: PXD) as a prominent example of a company that was previously waiting for $50 per barrel before deploying rigs, who has now said they actually are going to wait until oil rebounds to $60. Other companies targeting $60 per barrel include Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC) and Hess Corp. (NYSE: HES). Many companies have been burned several times, including last summer when a rally to $60 per barrel was followed by eight months of falling oil prices. This time around, they are going to be more cautious instead of reflexively returning back to the oil patch to drill once oil rises to $50 or even $55 per barrel.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

July 2016 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In July the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar gained ground against two of the three major currencies we track. The greenback appreciated by 1.2% against Canada’s “loonie” and 1.6% against the euro, but lost 1.1% against the yen. On a trade-weighted index basis, the dollar strengthened by 0.6% against a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.