What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Wednesday, August 29, 2018

2Q2018 Gross Domestic Product: Second Estimate

Click image for larger version
In its second estimate of 2Q2018 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) nudged the growth rate of the U.S. economy to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +4.23% (roughly in line with consensus expectations), up 0.16 percentage point (PP) from the “advance” estimate (“2Qv1”) and +2.01PP from 1Q2018.
All four groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- now show as having contributed to 2Q growth.
Overall, the revisions were quite modest. The growth rate for consumer spending for goods was revised lower by 0.12PP; services: -0.03PP. The contraction of inventories moderated slightly (+0.03PP) to -0.97%, while the growth rate in fixed investment rose by 0.13PP to +1.07%. The growth rate for imports improved +0.13PP (to +0.07%).
Real final sales of domestic product (which exclude inventories) were revised higher (+0.13PP from 2Qv1, to +5.20%), 3.25PP above the 1Q2018 estimate. 
Click image for larger version
“Although the revisions in this report can be characterized as statistical noise, a headline number with +4.23% growth is outstanding under any circumstance,” remarked Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis. “The stimulus expected from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 seems to be materializing. And the BEA's own ‘bottom line’ real final sales growth was reported to be +5.20% -- a number that some might consider to be unsustainably high or an early indication of an overheating economy.
“As we have mentioned before, this kind of growth signals that the Fed's accommodations over the past decade are certainly no longer needed. And if the growth persists in this range for another quarter or two, significant tightening might be in order.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Tuesday, August 28, 2018

July 2018 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family houses in July 2018 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 627,000 units (648,000 expected). This is 1.7% (±14.7%)* below the revised June rate of 638,000 (originally 666,000 units), but 12.8% (±15.7%)* above the July 2017 SAAR of 556,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +10.4%. For longer-term perspectives, not-seasonally adjusted sales were 54.9% below the “housing bubble” peak but 1.4% above the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The median sales price of new houses sold in July was $328,700 (+$18,700 or 6.0% MoM); meanwhile, the average sales price jumped to $394,300 (+$24,800 or 6.7%). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 11.3% of the total sold, down from the year-earlier 12.5%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 1.9% of those sold in July, little changed from 2.1% a year earlier.
* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in July, single-unit completions fell by 45,000 units (-5.2%). Because the drop in sales (-11,000 units; 1.7%) was outpaced by that of completions, inventory for sale expanded in both absolute (+6,000 units) and months-of-inventory terms (+0.2 month). 
Click image for larger view
Existing home sales fell by 40,000 units (-0.7%) in July, to a SAAR of 5.34 million units (5.425 million expected). Inventory of existing homes for sale shrank in absolute terms (-10,000 units) but months of inventory were unchanged at 4.3 months. Although new-home sales decreased more slowly than existing-home sales, the share of total sales comprised of new homes ticked down to 10.5%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in July retreated to $269,600 (-$4,200 or 1.5% MoM). 
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability degraded further as the median price of existing homes for sale in June jumped by $11,500 (+4.3%; +5.2 YoY), to a record-high $279,300. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.8% (+6.2% YoY) -- marking a new all-time high for the index.
“Home prices continue to rise across the U.S.” said David Blitzer, Managing Director and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “However, even as home prices keep climbing, we are seeing signs that growth is easing in the housing market. Sales of both new and existing homes are roughly flat over the last six months amidst news stories of an increase in the number of homes for sale in some markets. Rising mortgage rates -- 30-year fixed rate mortgages rose from 4% to 4.5% since January -- and the rise in home prices are affecting housing affordability.
“The West still leads the rise in home prices with Las Vegas displacing Seattle as the market with the fastest price increase. Population and employment growth often drive homes prices. Las Vegas is among the fastest growing U.S. cities based on both employment and population, with its unemployment rate dropping below the national average in the last year. The Northeast and Midwest are seeing smaller home price increases. Washington, Chicago and New York City showed the three slowest annual price gains among the 20 cities covered.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, August 17, 2018

July 2018 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in July at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,168,000 units (1.271 million expected). This is 0.9% (±11.5%)* above the revised June estimate of 1,158,000 (originally 1.173 million units), but 1.4% (±11.7%)* below the July 2017 SAAR of 1,185,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was -1.7%.
Single-family housing starts in July were at a SAAR of 862,000; this is 0.9% (±9.6%)* above the revised June figure of 854,000 units (+3.0% YoY). Multi-family starts: 306,000 units (+0.7% MoM; -13.1% YoY).
* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions in July were at a SAAR of 1,188,000 units. This is 1.7% (±10.9%)* below the revised June estimate of 1,209,000 and 0.8% (±11.3%)* below the July 2017 SAAR of 1,197,000 units; the NSA comparison: -1.3% YoY.
Single-family housing completions were at a SAAR of 814,000; this is 5.2% (±7.8%)* below the revised June rate of 859,000 (-4.6% YoY). Multi-family completions: 374,000 units (+6.9% MoM; +5.8% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits in July were at a SAAR of 1,311,000 units (1.304 million expected). This is 1.5% (±1.3%) above the revised June rate of 1,292,000 (originally 1.273 million units) and 4.2% (±1.7%) above the July 2017 SAAR of 1,258,000 units; the NSA comparison: +10.8% YoY.
Single-family authorizations were at a SAAR of 869,000; this is 1.9% (±1.4%) above the revised June figure of 853,000 (+12.1% YoY). Multi-family: 442,000 (+0.7% MoM; +8.0% YoY). 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes edged down one point to a solid 67 reading in August on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). “The good news is that builders continue to report strong demand for new housing, fueled by steady job and income growth along with rising household formations,” said NAHB Chairman Randy Noel. “However, they are increasingly focused on growing affordability concerns, stemming from rising construction costs, shortages of skilled labor and a dearth of buildable lots.”
“The solid economic expansion and firm job market should spur demand for new single-family homes in the months ahead,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “Meanwhile, builders continue to monitor how tariffs and the growing threat of a trade war are affecting key building material prices, including lumber. These cost increases, coupled with rising interest rates, are putting upward pressure on home prices and contributing to growing affordability challenges, as indicated by the latest quarterly reading of the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

July 2018 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Total industrial production (IP) edged up 0.1% in July (+0.3% expected) after rising at an average pace of 0.5% over the previous five months. Manufacturing production increased 0.3%, the output of utilities moved down 0.5%, and, after posting five consecutive months of growth, the index for mining declined 0.3%. At 108.0% of its 2012 average, total industrial production was 4.2% higher in July than it was a year earlier. 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Industry Groups
Manufacturing output increased 0.3% in July and was 2.8% higher than its year-earlier level. The index for durables rose 0.4%, the index for nondurables moved up 0.2%, and the index for other manufacturing (publishing and logging) fell 0.5%. Within durables, most major industry groups posted increases; the largest gains, of around 1% each, were for motor vehicles and parts and for computer and electronic products (wood products: +0.1%). Within nondurables, increases in the indexes for apparel and leather, for petroleum and coal products, for chemicals, and for plastics and rubber products were partly offset by decreases elsewhere (paper products: -0.8%).
Mining output declined in July, as a further increase in oil and gas extraction was slightly outweighed by decreases in the indexes for other mining and for mining support activities. Despite the pullback in July, mining output was nearly 13% above its year-earlier level. The index for utilities fell 0.5% in July for its third consecutive monthly decrease. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector was unchanged in July at 78.1%, a rate that is 1.7 percentage points (PP) below its long-run (1972–2017) average.
Manufacturing CU increased 0.2PP in July to 75.9%, a rate that is 2.4PP below its long-run average. The operating rates for durables and nondurables moved up 0.2PP and 0.1PP, respectively (wood products: -0.2%; paper products: -0.7%). The utilization rate for mining fell to 92.0%, which is 5.0PP higher than its long-run average. The rate for utilities fell 0.5PP to 77.5%, nearly 8PP below its long-run average. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries level nudged up 0.2% (+1.6 % YoY) to 138.4% of 2012 output. Manufacturing (NAICS basis) rose fractionally (+0.1% MoM; +1.3% YoY) to 138.1%. Wood products: +0.3% (+2.6% YoY) to 161.6%; paper products: -0.1% (-0.5% YoY) to 110.8%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, August 13, 2018

June 2018 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports extended their decline (25 MMBF or -15.6%) in June, joined by imports (-3 MMBF or -0.2%). Exports were 18 MMBF (-11.6%) below year-earlier levels; imports were 216 MMBF (+18.2%) higher. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 234 MMBF (22.8%) larger. However, the average net export deficit for the 12 months ending June 2018 was 7.2% smaller than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above). 
Click image for larger view
North America (of which Canada: 21.7%; Mexico: 16.4%) and Asia (especially China: 17.6%) were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports in June; the Caribbean ranked third with an 18.7% share. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were +34.1% relative to the same months in 2017. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of most (90.5%) of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Imports from Canada are 6.0% lower YTD than the same months in 2017. Overall, YTD exports were up 13.2% compared to 2017, while imports were down 5.2%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
U.S. softwood lumber export activity through the Eastern customs region represented the largest proportion in June (35.7% of the U.S. total), followed closely by the West Coast (34.3%) and the Gulf (21.0%) regions. However, Seattle maintained its lead (21.5% of the U.S. total) over Mobile (13.9%) and Savannah (12.8%) as the single most-active district. At the same time, Great Lakes customs region handled 62.3% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably the Duluth, MN district (26.9%) -- coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 27.9% of all softwood lumber exports in June, Douglas-fir (13.6%) and treated lumber (14.2%). Southern pine exports were up 23.2% YTD relative to 2017, while treated: +0.2%; Doug-fir: -5.0%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, August 10, 2018

July 2018 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2% in July (+0.2% expected). The shelter index (+0.3%) accounted for nearly 60% of the seasonally adjusted monthly increase in the all-items index. The food index rose slightly, with major grocery store food group indexes mixed. The energy index fell 0.5%, as all the major component indexes declined.
The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2% in July, the same increase as in May and June. Along with the shelter index, the indexes for used cars and trucks, airline fares, new vehicles, household furnishings and operations, and recreation all increased. The indexes for medical care and for apparel both declined in July.
The all-items index rose 2.9% for the 12 months ending July, the same increase as for the period ending June. The index for all items less food and energy rose 2.4%; this was the largest YoY increase since the period ending September 2008. The food index increased 1.4% YoY; the energy index: +12.1%. 
The Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) was unchanged in July (+0.3% expected). Final demand prices advanced 0.3% in June and 0.5% in May. In July, a 0.1% rise in the index for final demand goods offset a 0.1% decline in prices for final demand services. The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services moved up 0.3% in July, the same as in June.
On an unadjusted basis, the final demand index increased 3.3% for the 12 months ended in July; prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services climbed 2.8%.
Final Demand
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods inched up 0.1% in July, the same as in June. The July advance in prices for final demand goods can be traced to a 0.3% rise in the index for final demand goods less foods and energy. In contrast, prices for final demand energy fell 0.5%, and the index for final demand foods decreased 0.1%.
Product detail: In July, a major factor in the increase in prices for final demand goods was the index for pharmaceutical preparations, which rose 0.7%. Prices for eggs for fresh use, fresh fruits and melons, motor vehicles, and liquefied petroleum gas also moved higher. Conversely, the electric power index fell 1.6%. Prices for meats; hay, hayseeds, and oilseeds; and nonferrous scrap also decreased.
Final demand services: Prices for final demand services edged down 0.1% in July, the first decline since falling 0.2% in December 2017. The July decrease is attributable to the index for final demand trade services, which moved down 0.8%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) In contrast, prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing and the index for final demand transportation and warehousing services advanced 0.3%.
Product detail: Leading the July decline in prices for final demand services, margins for fuels and lubricants retailing dropped 12.7%. The indexes for machinery and equipment parts and supplies wholesaling, food retailing, hospital outpatient care, and airline passenger services also moved lower. Conversely, prices for guestroom rental climbed 3.9%. The indexes for apparel, jewelry, footwear, and accessories retailing; inpatient care; and truck transportation of freight also increased. 
Click image for larger version
The not-seasonally adjusted price indexes we track were mixed on a MoM basis, but all increased YoY. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, August 6, 2018

July 2018 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view
In July the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar (USD) appreciated versus Canada’s “loonie” (+0.1%) and yen (+1.3%), but depreciated against the euro (-0.1%). On a trade-weighted index basis, the USD gained 0.5% against a basket of 26 currencies. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, August 3, 2018

July 2018 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed that the expansion in U.S. manufacturing decelerated in July. The PMI registered 58.1%, down 2.1 percentage points (PP) from the June reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. “This indicates strong growth in manufacturing for the 23rd consecutive month, led by continued expansion in new orders, production and employment. Inventories are expanding at a faster rate as a result of supplier deliveries improving compared to the prior month,” said Timothy Fiore, Chair of ISM’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. The only sub-indexes with higher July values included employment and inventories. 
Click image for larger version
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- also slowed (-3.4PP) to 55.7%. Only employment, input prices and imports exhibited significant increases. 
Click image for larger version
All of the industries we track expanded in July. Respondent comments included the following --
* Wood Products: "The so-called trade war is now taking its toll on business activity, resulting in substantial reductions to new export orders. China has all but stopped taking orders, causing inventories to build up in the U.S. Domestic business is steady. However, it is too small to carry the load that export markets have retreated from. As a result, we will be meeting as a corporation next week to recast our second-half sales and revenue projections."
* Construction: "Business is strong in both our commercial-construction and residential-service areas."
* Wholesale Trade: "Import tariffs on wood and steel. Shortages of rail cars, truck drivers and skilled labor. High-priced construction materials."
Relevant commodities --
* Priced higher: Caustic soda; corrugate and corrugated boxes; oil; fuel (diesel and gasoline); natural gas; paper; lumber; transportation and trucking services.
* Priced lower: None.
* Prices mixed: None.
* In short supply: Construction subcontractors; labor (construction and temporary); and truck drivers.

IHS Markit’s July surveys presented a mixed view.
Manufacturing -- PMI dips to five-month low in July
Key findings:
* Manufacturing growth remains strong, despite easing slightly
* Output expands at softest pace for eight months
* Inflationary pressures intensify
Services -- Service sector business activity growth remains sharp, but prices charged rise at fastest rate in almost four years
Key findings:
* Business activity upturn one of the strongest in last three years
* New business expands at weakest rate for six months
* Input price inflation eases, but charges rise at accelerated pace

Markit commentary --
Manufacturing: “The U.S. manufacturing sector continued to expand in July, but shows increasing signs of struggling against headwinds of supply shortages, rising prices and deteriorating exports.
"The latest survey showed output rising at a rate roughly equivalent to an annualized 1% pace of expansion, which is the weakest since late last year. While a weakening of new export orders for a second successive month suggested foreign demand has waned compared to earlier in the year, the slowdown can be also in part attributed to increased difficulties in sourcing sufficient quantities of inputs. Suppliers’ delivery delays were more widespread than at any time in the survey’s history. With producers often scrambling to buy enough raw materials, suppliers enjoyed greater pricing power. Not surprisingly, with tariffs also kicking in, cost pressures spiked higher again.
"Some relief for manufacturers came from strong domestic demand, which meant firms were increasingly able to pass higher costs on to customers. Average prices charged for goods consequently rose at the steepest rate for seven years, which is likely to feed through to higher consumer prices in coming months."

Services: “U.S. service providers experienced strong growth conditions at the start of the third quarter, with business activity rising at only a slightly softer pace than in June. Strong domestic demand helped to support another improvement in new order levels and a solid expansion of payroll numbers in July.
“However, business expectations across the service economy edged down to a six-month low. Survey respondents cited concerns about rising costs and trade frictions, alongside difficulties sustaining the tempo of new business growth seen in the second quarter of 2018.
”Rising operating expenses continued to place pressure on margins in the service economy, partly reflecting higher wages and fuel bills in July. There were signs that higher input costs have started to shift through to consumers, as service providers recorded the fastest increase in their average prices charged since September 2014.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

July 2018 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment rose by 157,000 jobs in July -- below expectations of +188,000. In addition, combined May and June employment gains were revised up by 59,000 (May: +24,000; June: +35,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) slipped to 3.9% because employment gains (+389,000) dwarfed the expansion in the labor force (+105,000). 
Click image for larger view
Observations from the employment reports include:
* Household and establishment survey results were directionally in sync, although employment gains in the household survey were more than double those in the establishment survey.
* We have often been critical of the BLS’s seeming to “plump” the headline numbers with favorable adjustment factors, and that appears to have occurred in July. Although imputed jobs from by the CES (business birth/death model) adjustment were significantly above average for the month of July (since 2000), the BLS also applied a roughly average seasonal adjustment to the base data. Had average July adjustments been used, employment changes might have been roughly +46,000 instead of the reported +157,000.
* As for industry details, Manufacturing expanded by 37,000 jobs. That result is reasonably consistent with the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which expanded in July at a slightly faster pace than in June. Wood Products employment gained 800 jobs (ISM was unchanged); Paper and Paper Products: +600 (ISM increased). Construction employment added 19,000 (ISM increased). 
Click image for larger view
* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) rose by 96,000 (+0.1%), to 95.6 million (within 0.3% of May’s record). Meanwhile, the employment-population ratio ticked up at 60.5%; thus, for every five people being added to the population, roughly three are employed. 
Click image for larger view
* The labor force participation rate (LFPR) was unchanged at 62.9% -- comparable to levels seen in the late-1970s. Average hourly earnings of all private employees rose by $0.07, to $27.05, resulting in a 2.7% year-over-year increase. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages advanced by $0.03, to $22.65 (+2.7% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls contracted to 34.5 hours (-0.1 hour), average weekly earnings decreased by $0.28 (0.0%), to $933.23 (+3.0% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of 2.9% in June, workers appear -- officially, at least -- to be holding steady in terms of purchasing power. 
Click image for larger view
* Full-time jobs gained ground in July when advancing by 453,000. Those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- dropped by 176,000; non-economic reasons: +228,000. Those holding multiple jobs jumped by 453,000 (to 8.072 million, the highest number since August 2008). 
Click image for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld increased in July, by $6.7 billion (+3.6% MoM; -1.2% YoY), to $192.5 billion; it is difficult to conclude anything meaningful from the data beyond observing that the YoY falloff reflects lower withholding rates from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. To reduce some of the volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending July was 3.9% below the year-earlier average -- well off the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

June 2018 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments in May increased $4.9 billion or 1.0% to $501.4 billion. Durable goods shipments increased $3.7 billion or 1.5% to $251.1 billion led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $1.2 billion or 0.5% to $250.2 billion, led by chemical products. Shipments of wood products rose by 0.8%; paper: +0.5%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories increased $0.7 billion or 0.1% to $669.3 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.33, down from 1.35 in May. Inventories of durable goods decreased $0.5 billion or 0.1% to $402.9 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories increased $1.1 billion or 0.4% to $266.3 billion, led by chemical products. Inventories of wood products expanded by 0.6%; paper: +0.3%. 
Click image for larger view
New orders increased $3.3 billion or 0.7% to $501.7 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders rose by 0.4% (+8.0% YoY). Durable goods orders increased $2.1 billion or 0.8% to $251.5 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- decelerated to +0.2% (+6.2% YoY). New orders for nondurable goods increased $1.2 billion or 0.5% to $250.2 billion.
As can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders were essentially flat between early 2012 and mid-2014, recouping on average less than 70% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. The recovery in real new orders is back to just 59% of the ground given up in the Great Recession. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $4.4 billion or 0.4% to $1,165.2 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.64, down from 6.67 in May. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders then jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have gradually declined and are only now turning higher.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

July 2018 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil advanced in July, rising by $3.16 (+4.7%), to $71.04 per barrel. The increase occurred within an environment of a stronger U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 416,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) jump in the amount of oil supplied/demanded during May (to 20.4 million BPD), and a leveling-off in accumulated oil stocks (monthly average: 408 million barrels). 
Click image for larger view
From the 30 July 2018 issue of Peak Oil Review:
Oil prices climbed steadily through Thursday (7/26), supported by easing US-EU trade tensions and a temporary shutdown by the Saudis of a critical crude oil shipping lane. On Friday prices fell in sympathy with the US equities market to end the week at $74.29 in London and $68.69 in New York. Crude prices were unfazed last week by the unexpectedly robust US GDP figure, or the threatening rhetoric exchanged between Tehran and Washington.
There are so many issues affecting oil prices these days that analysts are all over the map on forecasts for oil prices. At the bottom of the forecast range is Citi bank which says that Brent soon could fall back into a trading range of $45 to $65 a barrel. Goldman Sachs is in the middle forecasting a $70-80 range for Brent, while Bank of America says that Brent could rise to $90 by the second quarter of next year.  However, the Bank says that should Iranian exports be completely cut off then there would be a price spike above $120 a barrel. An interesting outlier from economist Philip K. Verleger suggests that oil prices could increase to $200 a barrel solely because of new regulations on sulfur emissions for maritime fuels which begin in 2020.
Some believe that the markets are ignoring the risks of tightening supplies. These analysts note that the expected increase in oil exports from OPEC and Russia has not materialized and that reports of spare Saudi capacity that will be brought into production are overblown. The attack on two Saudi oil tankers in the Strait of Bab El Mandeb by Yemeni Houthi forces could presage more troubles in the area. The Bab El Mandeb is not militarized by US-NATO naval forces -- which means it is far more exposed to attacks than the Strait of Hormuz. 
Click image for larger view
Selected highlights from the emailed 31 July 2018 issue of OilPrice.com Intelligence Report include:
Oil prices rose on Monday (7/30), in part because of a weaker dollar. But prices then fell significantly on Tuesday. "The market's attempting to stabilize," said Gene McGillian, VP of research at Tradition Energy. "Right now we're seeing a balance between the ideas that the increase in production from Saudi Arabia and Russia is going to offset the loss in Venezuela and Iran." As July draws to a close, oil is set for its largest monthly loss in over a year.
Permian pipelines beginning to bottleneck. Permian pipelines are starting to “max out,” according to data from Kayrros. That means that price differentials are set to widen through mid-2019 as production continues to edge up. The earliest relief will come from the BridgeTex pipeline expansion, which will come online in early 2019, but it will only add 40,000 bpd. The bottleneck is expected to force a slowdown in production growth, and Morgan Stanley estimates that the Permian might only be able to add 360,000 bpd next year, down from the Wall Street consensus of about 650,000 bpd.
Trump plans to water down fuel efficiency standards. The Trump administration is expected to unveil a deregulatory effort aimed at fuel efficiency standards in cars and light duty trucks. The effort will freeze Obama era regulations after 2020, requiring automakers to average a fleet wide corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) at about 37 miles per gallon, instead of allowing those standards to steadily rise to above 50 mpg through 2025. The proposal could lead to increased fuel demand by about 500,000 bpd through 2029. The crucial and controversial component would be the federal government's attempt to strip California of its authority to set its own standards. It is almost certainly headed for a protracted legal fight.
Why did Saudi Arabia cease oil shipments through Bab el-Mandeb? Reuters looks into the question of whether Saudi Arabia had political motives when it halted oil shipments through the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb last week. Because other exporters did not suspend shipments, Saudi Arabia's move is curious. Saudi officials could be trying to draw western powers into the war with Yemen by sounding the alarm on the threat to oil shipments, or it could be putting pressure on Europe to take a harder line on Iran.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.