Click image for larger version
Click image for larger version
“The importance of the price deflator used by the BEA cannot be overstated. In calculating the "real" GDP the BEA continued to use an overall 1.9 percent annualized inflation rate, which is substantially lower than the inflation rates being reported by any of the BEA's sister agencies. The mathematical implications of the deflator are simple: a lower deflator creates a higher "real" GDP reading. If April's CPI-U (as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics) of 3.2 percent year-over-year inflation is used as the deflator, the reported 1.84 percent annualized growth rate shrinks to a 0.56 percent annualized rate, and the "real final sales of domestic products" is actually contracting at a 0.63 percent rate. If instead of the year-over-year CPI-U we were to use the annualized CPI-U from just the first quarter (5.7 percent), the "real" GDP would be shrinking at a 1.82 percent annualized rate, and the "real final sales of domestic products" would be contracting at a recession-like 3.01 percent.
“Although the overall reported headline rate for the GDP remained essentially unchanged, the numbers reflected somewhat weaker consumer contributions and anemic "real final sales" -- all while using a price deflator that strains [credulity]….”