What is Macro Pulse?

Macro Pulse highlights recent activity and events expected to affect the U.S. economy over the next 24 months. While the review is of the entire U.S. economy its particular focus is on developments affecting the Forest Products industry. Everyone with a stake in any level of the sector can benefit from
Macro Pulse's timely yet in-depth coverage.


Friday, February 27, 2015

4Q2014 Gross Domestic Product: Second (Preliminary) Estimate

Click image for larger version
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ (BEA) “preliminary” estimate, 4Q2014 growth in real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) was pegged at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of 2.2% -- down nearly 0.5 percentage point from the previous (“advance”) 4Q estimate, and 2.8 percentage points lower than 3Q’s 5.0%. Analysts had expected a deeper revision to 2.1% (ranging from +1.7 to 2.4%). Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and private domestic investment (PDI) contributed to 4Q growth, while net exports (NetX) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) subtracted from it.
Changes in this report primarily reflected a downward revision to private investment (mainly inventories) and an upward revision to imports that were partly offset by upward revisions to nonresidential fixed investment and to state and local government spending. 
Click image for larger version
Consumer Metrics Institute (CMI) summarized the report as follows:
The revisions in this report are relatively minor, and probably should be considered just "noise" in the context of an economy with a slowing growth rate. Among our observations about this report are:
-- At face value, the 4Q2014 +2.06% "bottom line" Real Final Sales growth rate seems plausible.
-- The reported strong 3-to-4Q growth in fixed investment occurred primarily in two areas: IT spending and the recently added (and very fuzzy) arena of "intellectual property."
-- Rampant or rogue deflators are likely as much a factor in the headline number as real growth.
“Looking forward,” wrote CMI’s analysts, “we are often told that ‘bad weather’ is a major factor in 1Q economic data -- keeping shoppers home and suppressing construction work. Given the quarter-to-quarter weakening already evident in the GDP numbers, 1Q2015 probably wasn’t going to be particularly pleasant even before the recent record snowfalls. It could now be getting just as nasty as the weather itself.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

January 2015 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version
The seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) declined 0.7% in January (about in line with expectations of -0.6%). The energy index fell 9.7% as the gasoline index fell 18.7% in January, the sharpest in a series of seven consecutive declines. The gasoline decrease was overwhelmingly the cause of the decline in the all items index, which would have risen 0.1% had the gasoline index been unchanged. The fuel oil index also fell sharply, and the index for natural gas turned down, although the electricity index rose. The food index was unchanged in January, with the food at home index falling for the first time since May 2013.
The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2% in January. The shelter index rose 0.3%, and the indexes for personal care, for apparel, and for recreation increased as well. The medical care index was unchanged, while an array of indexes declined in January, including those for household furnishings and operations, alcoholic beverages, new vehicles, used cars and trucks, airline fares, and tobacco. 
The all items index declined 0.1% over the last 12 months, the first negative 12-month change since the period ending October 2009. The energy index fell 19.6% over the span, with the gasoline index down 35.4%. The food index rose 3.2% (thanks, in part, to ground beef increasing by 21%), and the index for all items less food and energy increased 1.6%.  
The seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI) decreased 0.8% in January (versus expectations of -0.5%). Final demand prices moved down 0.2% in both December and November. In January, the 0.8% decline in final demand prices can be traced primarily to a 2.1% decrease in the index for final demand goods. Prices for final demand services fell 0.2%.
Final demand goods:  The index for final demand goods moved down 2.1% in January, the seventh consecutive decrease. Prices for final demand energy fell 10.3% -- led by the index for gasoline, which dropped 24.0%. Prices for diesel fuel, jet fuel, basic organic chemicals, dairy products, and home heating oil also moved lower. Conversely, the index for residential electric power moved up 1.2%. The indexes for final demand foods and for final demand goods less foods and energy moved down 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively.
Final demand services:  The index for final demand services decreased 0.2% in January, the first decline since falling 0.3% in September 2014. In January, prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing moved down 0.4%, and the index for final demand transportation and warehousing services dropped 0.8%. In contrast, margins for final demand trade services advanced 0.5%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.) 
Click image for larger version
The price indexes we track were mixed on both month-over-month and year-over-year bases in January. The Wood Fiber index hit a new all-time high, however. 
Click image for larger version
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

January 2015 U.S. Home Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Sales of new single-family homes edged lower in January, by 1,000 units (-0.2%) relative to the previous month, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 481,000. Sales have been essentially flat (averaging 437,000) since January 2013. Sales in January were 9.1% above year-earlier levels.
Meanwhile, the median price of new homes sold declined by $7,800 (-2.6%) to $294,300. The average price of homes sold retreated by a substantial $30,400 (-8.0%), implying that lower-end homes comprised a larger share of new-home sales in January than in December. Because single-family starts decreased faster than sales in January, the three-month average ratio of starts to sales dropped to 1.48; that ratio is just a shade higher than the average since January 1995. 
Click image for larger view
As mentioned in our post on January’s housing permits, starts and completions, single-unit completions retreated by 15,000 units (-2.3%). New-home inventory expanded in absolute (+3,000 units) terms while months of inventory was unchanged. 
Existing home sales plunged to a nine-month low in January (-250,000 units or 4.9%) to 4.82 million units (SAAR); expectations were for a drop to 4.95 million. Because sales of new homes fell more slowly than existing homes, the share of total sales comprised of new homes rose to 9.1% (the largest share since August 2008). The median price of previously owned homes sold in January dipped by $8,600 (-4.1%) to $199,600. Inventory of existing homes rose in both absolute (+10,000 units) and months of inventory (+0.3 month).
Click image for larger view
Housing affordability edged lower in December as the median price of existing homes for sale rose by $2,300 (+1.1%) to $210,200. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of less than -0.1% in December (+4.6% relative to a year earlier).
David Blitzer, managing director and chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices observed that “the housing recovery is faltering” despite continued low interest rates and positive consumer confidence. “While prices and sales of existing homes are close to normal, construction and new home sales remain weak. Before the current business cycle, any time housing starts were at their current level of about one million at annual rates, the economy was in a recession.”
“Movements in home prices show clear regional patterns,” Blitzer continued. “The regional patterns and the weakness in new construction and new sales may reflect decreasing mobility -- fewer people moving to different parts of the country or seeking jobs in different regions.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

January 2015 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total housing starts retreated in January, to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of 1.065 million units. That level was 22,000 units lower (-2.0%) than December’s 1.087 million units (revised down from 1.089 million). All of the decrease in total starts occurred in the single-family component (-49,000 units or 6.7%); multi-family starts rose by 27,000 units (+7.5%). 
Click image for larger view
The year-over-year percentage change in total starts remained positive in January (+18.3%). Single-family starts were 14.8% above their year-earlier level, and +24.4% for the multi-family component. One can see the magnitude of the seasonal adjustments by comparing the current-month SAAR estimates in the table above with the not-seasonally adjusted year-to-date values. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Completions rose by 12,000 units (+1.3%) in January, to 930,000 units SAAR. All of the increase occurred in the multi-family component (+27,000 units or 10.6%); the single-family component shrank by 15,000 units (-2.3%). Total completions were 9.6% above their year-earlier level. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Total permits declined in January, decreasing by 7,000 units (-0.7%), to 1.053 million SAAR. All of the decrease occurred in the single-family component (-21,000 units or 3.1%); multi-family permits rose (+14,000 units or 3.6%). January total permits were 3.6% above their year-earlier level.
The latest National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) shed two points in February (to 55). An index value above 50 means more builders feel the market is good than feel it is poor. “Overall, builder sentiment remains fairly solid, with this slight downturn largely attributable to the unusually high snow levels across much of the nation,” said NAHB Chairman Tom Woods. Interestingly, builder confidence rose in the Northeast (where snowfall has been heaviest) but fell in the Midwest.
“For the past eight months, confidence levels have held in the mid- to upper 50s range, which is consistent with a modest, ongoing recovery,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Solid job growth, affordable home prices and historically low mortgage rates should help unleash growing pent-up demand and keep the housing market moving forward in the year ahead.” 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2015 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version
Industrial production (IP) increased 0.2% in January (below expectations of +0.4%) after decreasing 0.3% in December. The rates of change in output for September through December were slightly reduced; even so, production is estimated to have advanced at an annual rate of 4.3% in 4Q2015. In January, manufacturing output (representing 74.3% of the IP index) moved up 0.2% and was 5.6% above its year-earlier level. The index for mining (which makes up 15.9% of the IP index) decreased 1.0%, with the decline more than accounted for by a substantial drop in the index for oil and gas well drilling and related support activities. The output of utilities (9.8% of the IP index) increased 2.3%. At 106.2% of its 2007 average, total IP in January was 4.8% above its level of a year earlier. Wood Products output jumped by 0.5% while Paper was unchanged.  
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version 
Click image for larger version
Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector was unchanged in January at 79.4%, a rate that is 0.7 percentage point below its long-run (1972–2014) average. Wood Products and Paper CU both rose by 0.1. 
Click image for larger version
Capacity at the all-industries and manufacturing levels moved higher, both by 0.1%. Wood Products extended its ongoing upward trend (since July 2013) when increasing by 0.3%. Paper, on the other hand, contracted by 0.1% to another new low.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

February 2015 Macro Pulse -- Will Atlas Shrug?

Atlas was the primordial Titan in Greek mythology who held up the celestial spheres. In somewhat similar fashion, the United States “is carrying the world economy at the moment, [but] that is simply not sustainable,” Canadian Finance Minister Joe Oliver recently remarked. “Collectively, [the leading indicators] suggest that the U.S. is not immune to a global slowdown,” agreed Charlie Bilello, research director at Pension Partners. “From easy monetary policy to plummeting yields and inflation expectations, the U.S. looks very much like its global peers.” So, will “Atlas” shrug and allow the global economy to fall? Perhaps the following observations will provide some answers.
Click here to read the rest of the February 2015 Macro Pulse recap.

The Macro Pulse blog is a commentary about recent economic developments affecting the forest products industry. The monthly Macro Pulse newsletter summarizes the previous 30 days of commentary available on this website.

Saturday, February 7, 2015

December 2014 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view
Softwood lumber exports decreased by 2 MMBF (-1.8%) in December (the smallest volume since September 2012) while imports fell by 59 MMBF (5.9%). Exports were 29 MMBF (19.7%) below year-earlier levels; imports were 161 MMBF (18.0%) higher. 
Click image for larger view
The rest of North America (i.e., Canada and Mexico) was once again the primary destination for U.S. softwood lumber exports in November (45.9%). Asia (especially China and Japan) was a distant second (32.7%). Canada was also the largest single-country destination (24.0%). Year to date (YTD), exports to China were -13.0% relative to the same period in 2013 (down from roughly +11% YOY as recently as September). Meanwhile, Canada was the source of nearly all (95.3%) softwood lumber imports into the United States. Overall, YTD exports were down 2.7% compared to the same period in 2013, while imports were up 11.1%. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Despite the port slowdown, U.S. softwood lumber export activity through West Coast customs districts increased in December (to roughly 39% of the U.S. total, from 35% in November); Seattle retained the title of most-active district, with 25.7% of the December total. At the same time, Great Lakes customs districts handled over 70% of the softwood lumber imports (especially Duluth, MN with 32%) coming into the United States. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Southern yellow pine comprised 22.7% of all softwood lumber exports in December, followed by Douglas-fir with 16.3%. YTD, southern pine exports were up 23.4% relative to the same months in 2013, while Douglas-fir exports were down 20.5%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

December 2014 International Trade (General)

Click image for larger view
The goods and services deficit was $46.6 billion in December (well above expectations of $37.9 billion), up $6.8 billion from $39.8 billion in November. December exports were $194.9 billion, down $1.5 billion from November. December imports were $241.4 billion, up $5.3 billion from November.
The December increase in the goods and services deficit reflected an increase in the goods deficit of $6.9 billion to $66.0 billion and an increase in the services surplus of $0.1 billion to $19.5 billion.
For 2014, the goods and services deficit was $505.0 billion, up $28.7 billion or 6.0% from 2013. Exports were $2,345.4 billion, up $65.2 billion or 2.9%.  Imports were $2,850.5 billion, up $93.9 billion or 3.4%. 
Click image for larger view
On a global scale, data compiled by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis showed that world trade volume decreased by 1.0% in November (from the prior month) while prices fell by 1.5%.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Friday, February 6, 2015

January 2015 Employment Report

Click image for larger view
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment increased by 257,000 jobs in January -- better than expectations of 230,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) ticked up by 0.1 percentage point, to 5.7% as more potential workers entered the labor force.
Although the overall tone of the report is positive, it is difficult to determine how much of the improvement is “organic” how much is statistical. The January report is notoriously noisy: Many of the flood of retail workers hired for the holidays are being let go; in addition, the numbers are subject to not only the “usual” monthly adjustments from the BLS’s business “birth/death” model, but also new seasonal adjustments that flow from re-benchmarking work the BLS undertakes annually to account for population changes. Taking into account all of the changes, employers now are estimated to have created 3.116 million jobs -- up 164,000 over the previous estimate of 2.592 million; 147,000 of the 164,000 were added to the data for November and December 2014.
As for other observations from the employment report:
  • The disparity between the establishment survey (+257,000 jobs) and the household survey (+453,000 jobs) was relatively modest in January.
  • Virtually all private super-sectors of the economy saw employment gains last month. Of particular interest, construction added 39,000 jobs and 22,000 in manufacturing. On a less-positive note, the number of bartenders and restaurant wait staff rose to 10.946 million (+35,000) -- continuing the trend toward convergence with the number of manufacturing jobs (12.330 million). 

Click image for larger view
  • For example, the employment-population ratio finally edged up by 0.001% after holding steady at 0.592 during the previous three months. The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force dropped back to 92.5 million (-354,000). Moreover, the 55-and-over age cohort achieved yet another all-time high of almost 33.0 million workers in January; that cohort outnumbers the next-largest (45-to-54 years) by 237,000. 

Click image for larger view
  • The labor force participation rate rose 0.2 percentage point (to 62.9%), but hovered near its multi-decade low of 62.7%. Average hourly earnings of all private employees jumped by $0.12 (the largest gain since June 2007), resulting in a 2.2% year-over-year increase (the largest 12-month gain since December 2012). For all production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), wages rose by $0.07/hour (+2.0% YOY). With the CPI running at an official annual rate of 0.8%, wages are technically keeping up with price inflation. 

Click image for larger view
  • Finally, full-time jobs increased (+777,000) along with part-time jobs (+40,000). Full-time jobs have been trending higher since December 2009, but have yet to recapture the pre-recession high. Part-time jobs, by contrast, have been stuck in a channel between roughly 27 and 28 million.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

December 2014 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments decreased $5.3 billion or 1.1% to $488.2 billion in December. Shipments of durable goods increased $3.2 billion or 1.3% to $247.4 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments decreased $8.5 billion or 3.4% to $240.8 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Wood and Paper shipments rose by, respectively, 0.9 and 0.8%. 
Click image for larger view
Inventories decreased $2.0 billion or 0.3% to $653.9 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.34, up from 1.33 in November.
Inventories of durable goods increased $1.8 billion or 0.4% to $410.5 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories decreased $3.8 billion or 1.5% to $243.4 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of Wood and Paper expanded by, respectively, 0.2 and 0.3%. 
Click image for larger view
New orders decreased $16.4 billion or 3.4% to $471.5 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders decreased 2.3% -- the seventh drop in the last eight months. Durable goods orders decreased $8.0 billion or 3.3% to $230.6 billion, led by transportation equipment. New orders for nondurable goods decreased $8.5 billion or 3.4% to $240.8 billion.
Prior to July 2014, as can be seen in the graph above, real (inflation-adjusted) new orders had been essentially flat since early 2012, recouping roughly 75% of the losses incurred since the beginning of the Great Recession. With July’s transportation-led spike now in the rearview mirror, new orders have dropped back to around 55% of their December 2007 high. 
Click image for larger view
Unfilled durable-goods orders decreased $9.4 billion or 0.8% to $1,166.9 billion, led by transportation equipment. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.69, down from 6.81 in November. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show a much different picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to just 79% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders, hence, this metric is likely to remain elevated for several years.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

January 2015 ISM and Markit Reports

Click image for larger version
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) monthly opinion survey showed that growth of economic activity in the U.S. manufacturing sector slowed again in January. The PMI retreated from December’s 55.1% (originally 55.5%) to 53.5% in January -- its lowest reading since March 2014 (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion). Expectations had centered around 54.5%. ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. All sub-indices except inventories and imports were lower in January.
“Comments from the panel indicate that most industries, but not all, are experiencing strong demand as 2015 kicks off,” said Bradley Holcomb, chair of ISM’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “The West Coast dock slowdown continues to be a problem, negatively impacting both exports and imports as well as inventories.” 
Click image for larger version
Wood Products expanded in January, although supporting changes in the sub-indices were limited to inventories and backlogged orders. Increasing new orders, production and employment were sufficient to put Paper Products into expansion category. The port slowdown mentioned above figured prominently in respondent comments. “Chinese New Year, West Coast port dock slowdowns, coupled with railroad embargo are all creating logistical challenges and increased backlog of orders,” wrote one Wood Products respondent. “West Coast port slowdown is getting serious,” added a Paper Products respondent. “Mill has 40+ days of production at the ports and various warehouses.”
The pace of growth in the non-manufacturing sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- managed to eke out a small gain in January. The NMI registered 56.7%, 0.2 percentage point above December’s 56.5% (originally 56.2%). The sub-indices were generally higher than in December; notable exceptions included employment, input prices and imports. “Comments from respondents vary by industry and company,” said Anthony Nieves, chair of ISM’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee; “however, they are mostly positive and/or reflect stability about business conditions.” 
Click image for larger version
Two of the three service industries we track (Real Estate and Construction) reported contraction in January; in both cases the drop-off in new orders (along with employment in the case of Construction) negated the countervailing impacts of other sub-indices. The comment from one respondent that “construction demand is growing” apparently was not representative of the entire industry.
Relevant commodities up in price included uncoated freesheet; lumber: pine, spruce, treated. Natural gas; paper; and propane were down in price. Some reported fuel (both gasoline and diesel) as cheaper, others as more expensive. No relevant commodities were in short supply.
ISM’s and Markit’s surveys were largely in agreement in January. Whereas ISM’s PMI reflected decelerating growth, Markit’s U.S. Manufacturing PMI was unchanged; ISM’s NMI and Markit’s U.S. Services PMI both showed modestly accelerating activity.
“Manufacturing continued to expand in January,” said Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief economist, “but the sector remains in a lower gear compared to that seen last summer. Factory output growth and job creation remain well below last year’s peaks, adding to the suspicion that the pace of economic expansion in the first quarter could even fall below the 2.6% rate seen in the final quarter of last year.
“The strong dollar is hurting the competitiveness of exports, and the weak oil price is already resulting in weaker demand for investment goods from the energy sector. However, low oil prices are also helping to cut manufacturing costs, which fell for the first time in two-and-a-half years, and should also help boost consumer spending power, driving economic growth high.
“The fear is that the economy will become increasingly reliant on the consumer to sustain growth, which is another reason besides the economic slowdown to believe that policymakers will be wary of raising household’s borrowing costs via rate hikes any time soon.”
Summing up the U.S. Services PMI report, Williamson said, “Markit’s U.S. PMI surveys accurately anticipated the near-halving in the pace of economic growth in the fourth quarter of 2014, and suggest that the rate of expansion remained little better than 2.0% annualized at the start of 2015.
“Companies are clearly struggling at the moment, with the surveys recording the smallest increase in new orders seen since the financial crisis six years ago amid weaker US and global economic growth and the strong US dollar.
“However, the survey also found that companies remained in hiring mode, pointing to another robust non-farm payroll gain in January. At the same time, cost pressures hit a post-crisis low due to the oil price rout, which should pave the way for further falls in headline inflation in coming months.
“Irrespective of the employment gain, the combination of lower inflation and slower economic growth suggests that any lifting of interest rates before mid-year is looking increasingly unlikely.”
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

January 2015 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view
The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil extended its retreat for a seventh month, plunging by $11.63 to $47.97 per barrel; that is the lowest price since March 2009. The price drop coincided with a strengthening U.S. dollar, the lagged impacts of a 424,000 barrel-per-day (BPD) decrease in the amount of oil supplied/demanded in November (to 19.0 million BPD), and a dramatic accumulation of crude oil stocks (to the highest levels since 1982). The monthly average price spread between Brent crude (the predominant grade used in Europe) and WTI narrowed by $2.73 in January, to $0.31 per barrel. 
Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Because prices of near-term futures contracts stabilized in January while prices for later contracts are retracing upward moves, we do not expect significant additional fallout in spot oil prices. 
Click image for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

Monday, February 2, 2015

December 2014 U.S. Construction Spending

Click image for larger view 
Click image for larger view
Overall construction spending in the United States rose by 0.4% during December (against expectations of a 0.7% increase), to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of $982.1 billion. Private construction spending edged up 0.1%, with outlays for power projects falling 1.0% and spending on transportation dropping 1.4%. Outlays on residential projects rose 0.3%. Residential spending was lifted by gains in both single- and multi-family homes as well as renovations. Spending on public construction projects increased 1.1% in December, and continues to be much stronger than the private sector. 
Click image for larger view
Click here for a discussion of December’s new residential permits, starts and completions. Click here for a discussion of new and existing home sales, inventories and prices.
The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.