Click image
for larger view
Click image
for larger view
Softwood
lumber exports decreased (13 MMBF or -7.9%) in September, while imports rose (149
MMBF or +12.8%). Exports were 12 MMBF (+9.1%) above year-earlier levels;
imports were 26 MMBF (-2.0%) lower. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net
export deficit was 237 MMBF (-19.1%) lower. Moreover, the average net export
deficit for the 12 months ending September 2017 was 9.5% smaller than the
average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown
in the graph above).
Click image
for larger view
Asia
(especially China: 25.3%) and North America (of which Canada: 16.1%; Mexico: 18.2%)
were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports in September. Not
surprisingly, the Caribbean ranked third with an 18.8% share. Year-to-date
(YTD) exports to China were +19.6% relative to the same months in 2016. Meanwhile,
Canada was the source of most (93.5%) of softwood lumber imports into the
United States. Interestingly, imports from Canada are 14.5% lower
YTD than the same months in 2016. Overall, YTD exports were up 4.6% compared to
2016, while imports were down 11.6%.
Click image
for larger view
Click image
for larger view
U.S.
softwood lumber export activity through the Eastern customs region represented
the largest proportion in September (38.4% of the U.S. total), followed by the West
Coast (30.4%) and the Gulf (25.4%) regions. However, Seattle maintained a small
lead (16.5% of the U.S. total) over Mobile (15.7%) and Savannah (14.0%) as the
single most-active district. At the same time, Great Lakes customs region handled
64.8% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably the Duluth, MN district (24.9%)
-- coming into the United States; interestingly, Seattle and Detroit were tied
with 16.2% each.
Click image
for larger view
Click image
for larger view
Southern
yellow pine comprised 33.7% of all softwood lumber exports in September, followed
by treated lumber (13.0%) and Douglas-fir (15.1%). Southern pine exports were up
9.2% YTD relative to 2016, while treated: +28.4%; Doug-fir: +9.2%.
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi
Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction
and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation
regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.