Click image
for larger view
According
to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics’ (BLS )
establishment survey, non-farm payroll employment rose by 201,000 jobs in August -- slightly above expectations
of +198,000. However, combined June and July employment gains were revised down
by 50,000 (June: -40,000; July: -10,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based
upon the BLS ’s household survey) remained
at 3.9% because the drop in the number of employed persons (-423,000) nearly
matched the contraction in the labor force (-469,000).
Click image
for larger view
Observations
from the employment reports include:
*
The household (423,000 fewer people employed) and establishment (+201,000 jobs)
survey results were wildly out of sync.
*
We have often been critical of the BLS’s seeming to “plump” the headline
numbers with favorable adjustment factors; that does not appear to have
occurred in August. Although imputed jobs from by the CES (business birth/death
model) adjustment were about
average for the month of August (since 2000), the BLS also applied a larger
(i.e., more negative) than-average seasonal adjustment to the base data. Had average
August adjustments been used, employment changes might have been roughly +236,000
instead of the reported +201,000.
*
As for industry details, Manufacturing contracted by 3,000 jobs. That result is
inconsistent with the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing
employment sub-index, which expanded in August at a faster pace than in July. Wood
Products employment lost 800 jobs (ISM was unchanged); Paper and Paper Products:
+1,800 (ISM increased). Construction employment added 23,000 (ISM increased).
Click image
for larger view
*
The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force (NILF) jumped
by 692,000 (+0.7%), to a new record of 96.3 million. Accordingly, the
employment-population ratio retreated to 60.3%; thus, for every five people being
added to the population, roughly three are employed.
Click image
for larger view
*
Similarly, the labor force participation rate (LFPR) fell to 62.7% -- comparable
to levels seen in the late-1970s. Average hourly earnings of all private employees
rose by $0.10, to $27.16, resulting in a 2.9% year-over-year increase. For all
production and nonsupervisory employees (pictured above), hourly wages advanced
by $0.07, to $22.73 (+2.8% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees
on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged at 34.5 hours, average weekly earnings
increased by $3.45 (+0.4%), to $937.02 (+3.5% YoY). With the consumer price
index running at an annual rate of 2.9% in July, workers may finally be gaining
ground -- officially, at least -- in terms of purchasing power.
Click image
for larger view
* Full-time jobs lost ground when retreating
by 444,000. Those employed part time for economic reasons (PTER) -- e.g., slack
work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work – dropped by 188,000;
non-economic reasons: +249,000. Those holding multiple jobs fell by 128,000.
Click image
for larger view
For a “sanity check” of the employment numbers, we
consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy”
and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld decreased in August, by
$1.3 billion (-0.7% MoM; +0.4% YoY), to $191.2 billion; it is difficult to
conclude anything meaningful from the data beyond observing that the YoY rise occurred
despite lower withholding rates from the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act of 2017. To reduce some of the volatility and determine broader
trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a
percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the
three months ending August was 1.9% below the year-earlier average -- well off
the peak of +13.8% set back in September 2013.
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.