Click image
for larger view
The
monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil fell
by $2.30 (-3.8%), to $57.52 per barrel in January. The decrease occurred within
the context of a marginally weaker U.S. dollar (broad trade-weighted index
basis -- goods and services), the lagged impacts of a 182,000 barrel-per-day (BPD)
decline in the amount of petroleum products supplied during November (to 20.8
million BPD), and a sideways move in accumulated oil stocks (January average: 431
million barrels).
Click image
for larger view
From
the 3 February 2020 issue of Peak Oil Review:
“Oil
prices fell for the fourth straight week on mounting worries about economic
damage from the coronavirus that has spread from China to around 20
countries. Futures closed the month down
about $10 a barrel since the beginning of the year, seeing the biggest January
loss since 1991. New York futures
settled at $51.56 and London at $56.62.
The rapid price decline is causing much consternation with OPEC+ as some
commentators are talking about $40 oil if the virus situation gets much worse.
“Global
oil prices rallied at the end of last year due to announcements of cuts in
production, followed by a boost in early January due to tensions in the Middle
East. But Brent crude is now down almost
17% from its early January peak, while U.S. natural gas prices are also under
pressure due to a mild winter. That is
prompting a lot of investors to consider more in-depth, longer-term challenges
for producers and refiners. Some
analysts warn that too many companies in the oil and gas sector have unsustainable
balance sheets, weighed down by too much debt.
“The
coronavirus-triggered fall in crude oil prices over the last few weeks has
shaken some OPEC countries, including Saudi Arabia, to the realization that
waiting until March 5-6, as scheduled, to potentially announce deeper
production cuts may be too late. OPEC’s
core Middle East members typically announce how they have allocated their crude
exports to customers between the 10th and 15th of each month. March loading programs and allocations have
already been set, so any OPEC+ decision would affect April shipments at the
earliest. Holding the meeting on its
scheduled date of March 5-6 would push any changes to the May loading program.
“Beyond
the physical market practicalities, the politics of agreeing on deeper cuts
could be complicated. OPEC and its 10
allies are one month into their latest production accord, which commits them to
a 1.7 million BPD cut through the end of March.
The deal, signed at a highly fractious meeting in December 2019, saw
Angola walk out of the talks at one point, and Iraq and Russia play hardball in
negotiating their new quotas. “Saudi
Arabia, as expected, is leading by example, but should other producers fail to
pull their weight or offer further adjustments, does the kingdom act
unilaterally if the coronavirus impact escalates and spirals from here on out?”
said an analyst with Medley Global Advisors.
“Even
with Libya’s oil production plummeting by nearly 1 million BPD due to a port
blockade, oil prices have seen downward pressure over the past week as fears of
oil demand destruction currently outweigh supply outages. Last week’s EIA inventory report was not
supportive, reporting a 3.5 million build during the seven days to January
4th. According to oil market analysts,
until the impact of the Wuhan virus on the Chinese economy and oil demand
becomes clearer, market participants will continue to be spooked by the specter
of waning oil demand during the season when demand is weakest.
“The
Phase One trade deal between the U.S. and China may end up being exports on
paper only—at least as far as energy is concerned. Analysts concur that the Chinese promise to
buy an additional $52.4 billion worth of U.S. energy products in 2020 and 2021
on top of the 2017 levels is most likely unachievable, even if China intends to
fulfill all its pledges in the deal.
With the coronavirus epidemic leaving a large share of Chinese industry,
retail, and non-essential transportation shut down for an indefinite period,
demand for oil in China and even around the world is bound to slow
significantly.”
Click image
for larger view
Selected
highlights from the 31 January 2020 issue of OilPrice.com’s Oil
& Energy Insider include:
Oil
posted its largest monthly loss since May 2019, as fears of the coronavirus
continue to rise. The 15% price decline is also the worst January performance
since 1991, according to Bloomberg. The oil market is “troubled by both rising
demand worries and rising fuel stocks,” said Ole Sloth Hansen, head of
commodities strategy at Saxo Bank A/S in Copenhagen. “It’s going to take a firm
commitment by OPEC+, or rising geopolitical tensions, to achieve a sustained
recovery.”
Bernstein:
Chinese oil demand growth at just 100,000 BPD. China’s oil demand
could grow at just 100,000 BPD this year due to the coronavirus, according to
Bernstein. That would make it the slowest expansion in consumption in nearly 20
years. The firm previously predicted 350,000 BPD of growth.
Investors
warn industry not to move on Trump’s deregulation. A group of 58 companies, including institutional
investors, representing around $113 billion in assets, warned
the energy, timber and mining industries not to move aggressively to take
advantage of the Trump administration’s wide-ranging deregulatory campaign. The
investors said that doing so would put investors at “significant risk of public
backlash and stranded assets, should these actions be legally challenged or
protections be restored by the courts or by future administrations.”
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.