However, rising unemployment and home foreclosures beg the question: “Where is the money coming from to support higher retail sales?” There are a couple of interesting possibilities beyond the most obvious (i.e., that those still employed are feeling a little freer with their pocketbooks):
* Anecdotal evidence indicates some homeowners are foregoing mortgage payments and purchasing “stuff” with the money they should be paying for housing. We doubt this practice is sufficiently widespread to materially boost consumer spending, but it is useful to be aware of this development.
* Anecdotal evidence indicates some homeowners are foregoing mortgage payments and purchasing “stuff” with the money they should be paying for housing. We doubt this practice is sufficiently widespread to materially boost consumer spending, but it is useful to be aware of this development.
* The Census Bureau’s method for calculating year-over-year changes uses only same-store sales for comparison; there is no attempt to account for the loss of sales at firms that have gone bankrupt (or underperforming chain stores that have closed) in the intervening time period. Same-store sales rise if, for example, the same total volume of merchandise is being sold through fewer outlets. Since the Census Bureau samples only a portion of existing retail establishments and infers activity of the entire industry from that sample, one can see how the result might look fairly positive.
Alternative views of retail activity, like sales tax revenue and real-time data on internet purchases of major durable goods provide a different – and more pessimistic – picture. Time will tell which view is right.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.