Click image
for larger version
According
to the Bureau
of Economic Analysis (BEA), the “advance” estimate of 1Q2014 growth in real
U.S. gross domestic product (GDP ) collapsed
to a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of 0.1 percent, down by 2.5
percentage points relative to 4Q2013’s growth rate. It was the weakest
performance in three years. Only one of the four categories -- personal
consumption expenditures (PCE) contributed to 1Q growth; the other categories
-- private domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government
consumption expenditures (GCE) subtracted from growth.
Commercial
activity was especially hard hit in this report. Exports were at the head of
the retreat, while commercial investments and inventories also weakened
significantly. Fixed investments in both equipment and residential construction
contracted sharply. Government spending also shrank, especially among the
sub-categories of federal defense spending and state and local governmental
infrastructure investment.
Consumer
spending for services provided the only significant growth, with outlays for
non-discretionary healthcare, housing, utilities and financial services (e.g.,
interest rates) all increasing. Spending on consumer goods was essentially flat.
Click image
for larger version
For
this report the BEA assumed annualized net aggregate inflation of 1.3 percent. By
way of comparison, the growth rate of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ seasonally
adjusted CPI -U index was higher (1.8
percent annualized rate); meanwhile, the price index reported by the Billion Prices Project (BPP )
was substantially higher at 3.91 percent. Were the BEA’s nominal estimates
corrected for inflation using the BPP
inflation rate, the 4Q real GDP would
have contracted
by 2.5 percent.
Inventories
contracted sharply, subtracting nearly 0.6 percentage point from the headline
growth rate (also down 0.6 percent from 4Q2013). As we have pointed out
previously, the first three quarters of 2013 saw substantial inventory growth
that boosted the reported annualized growth rate by an average of 1 percent. The
$64 question going forward is -- since inventories are typically a cyclical
zero-sum game, with excessive growth or contraction over any period subsequently
being reversed -- whether a corresponding multi-quarter contraction might occur
to “normalize” inventory levels. On the other hand, if the inclement weather
truly was as big a drag on economic activity as many
think was the case, the growth rate could conceivably bounce back in 2Q.
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.