Click image
for larger version
In
its advance (first) estimate of 2Q2017 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau
of Economic Analysis (BEA) pegged growth of the U.S. economy at a
seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +2.56% (in line with expectations),
up 1.14 percentage points (PP) from 1Q2017’s +1.24%. The 1Q rate was revised
lower (from +1.42% reported in June) as part of annual revisions going back to 1Q2014.
On
a year-over-year (YoY) basis, which should eliminate any residual seasonality
distortions present in quarter-over-quarter (QoQ) comparisons, GDP in 2Q2017 was
+2.08% relative to 2Q2016; that was marginally higher than 1Q2017’s +2.00%
relative to 1Q2016.
All
four groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE),
private domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government
consumption expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 2Q growth.
Click image
for larger version
Consumer
spending accelerated in 2Q2017 (+1.93%), up 1.18 PP from 1Q and very similar to
4Q2016. The inventory contraction of 1Q essentially disappeared (-0.02%), but
so too did much of the previous robust growth in commercial fixed investment (+0.36%,
down from 1.27% in 1Q). Governmental spending rose slightly (+0.12%), reversing
the prior quarter's contraction; and the growth rates for both exports (+0.48%)
and imports (-0.31%) moderated.
At
+2.58%, real final sales of domestic product -- the BEA's "bottom
line" indicator that excludes the influence of inventories -- was nearly
unchanged from the revised 1Q estimate.
For
2Q the BEA assumed an effective annualized deflator of 1.01%; inflation recorded
concurrently by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in its CPI-U index was only 0.06%. Overestimating inflation results in pessimistic growth rates; had the BEA's "nominal" data been deflated using CPI-U inflation
information, the headline growth number would have been a materially higher +3.53%.
Although
it is too soon to know for sure whether this somewhat more robust growth has any
staying power, Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis
believes “this report should provide the Federal Reserve with the data needed
to justify moving forward with their [monetary-policy] ‘normalization’
campaign.”
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute
a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.