Click image
for larger view
Month-over-Month,
Year-over-Year (YoY), and Year-to-Date (YTD):
* On
a month-over-month basis, November’s net exports posted a scant increase of 4 thousand
tonnes, or 0.2%, after October net exports were up by 21% from September. Despite
November essentially flat-lining, the marginal increase resulted in November
posting the highest level of net exports since January 2014.
* While
this performance seems to belie the well documented West Coast port
slowdown, when viewed on the basis of total tonnes processed (imports plus
exports), the slowdown is more apparent, dropping from 3.3 million tonnes in
October to 3.1 million tonnes in November. November’s net exports grew
marginally because imports fell by 106 thousand tonnes while exports fell by
102 thousand tonnes, resulting in a net increase of 4 thousand tonnes.
* On
a YoY basis November exports were down
51 thousand tonnes and imports down
94 thousand tonnes, resulting in a YoY increase
in net exports of 43 thousand tonnes. On a YTD basis, exports are down 182
thousand tonnes while imports are up 132 thousand tonnes, yielding a decline in
net exports of 314 thousand metric tonnes (-1.8%). The YTD increase in imports
and decline in exports is consistent with 2014’s emerging trends of slowing
global growth and a strengthening U.S. dollar.
Six-month Cumulative Activity and
Trends:
* Cumulative activity over the six
months ending November 2014 shows net exports are 1.0% below the pace seen over
the six months ending in November 2013. Cumulative six-month net exports are principally
lower due to higher imports (up 61 thousand tonnes or 1.3%) compared to exports
(down 29 thousand tonnes, or 0.2%).
* Six-month trend lines were fit to
the data to study recent trends beyond simple cumulative activity. November’s
six month trend line on net exports switched to positive compared to October’s
negative six month trend line. As noted previously, the reason for the change
from negative to positive is more about the decline in imports than the
increase in exports. Exports’ six-month trend did tick up from slightly
negative in October to flat for the six months ending in November. On the other
hand, the six-month import trend line became negative for November after being
flat in October.
Click image
for larger view
In terms of notable shifts in
country-level details:
* Pulp exports (24,096 thousand
tonnes YTD) are down slightly (-0.1%) compared to last year’s YTD levels. China
remains the chief destination of U.S. pulp by a wide margin, representing 56%
of YTD shipments. Nevertheless China’s exports have declined by 4.2% YTD
compared to the same period in 2013. India surpassed Mexico as the
second-ranked destination for U.S. pulp exports, representing 7.3% of YTD
exports compared to Mexico’s 7.2% share. While Mexico’s receipt of U.S. pulp
export are up nearly 10% YTD and India’s are up by 25%. Among 2013’s top 10
destinations, the most significant change is Indonesia where U.S. pulp exports
are 43% higher than prior YTD levels, causing it to jump from the ninth-ranked
2013 YTD destination to the sixth-ranked 2014 YTD destination. In terms of
declines among 2013’s top 10 destinations, Italy posted the most notable drop
on a percentage basis (nearly -25%).
Click image
for larger view
* Paper and paperboard exports (2,215
thousand tonnes) dropped by 6.6% on a YTD basis. Canada has leapfrogged Mexico
as the top destination for U.S. paper and paperboard exports, growing by 15.8%
YTD over same period in 2013, while Mexico’s purchases of U.S. paper and
paperboard declined by 6.2%. Among 2013’s Top 10 destinations, the “loss leader”
is India (102 thousand tonnes, -45.0% from prior YTD) followed by Mexico (32
thousand tonnes, -6.2% from prior YTD), Japan (22 thousand, -12.5% from prior
YTD) and China (16 thousand tonnes, -25.1% from prior YTD). Canada’s receipt of
U.S. paper and paperboard exports bucks the general decline. Costa Rica and
Guatemala are also receiving higher levels of U.S. paper and paperboard
exports; Costa Rica’s YTD receipts are up by over 21 thousand tonnes (+4.1%) and
Guatemala is up over 7 thousand tonnes (+16.1%).
Click image
for larger view
* Pulp imports (5,778 thousand tonnes
YTD) decreased -1.3% compared to prior YTD levels. Canada and Brazil -- the first-
and second-ranked pulp import sources, respectively -- account for nearly 94%
of the pulp imported. Despite their top ranking, both have logged declines in
pulp imported compared to prior YTD levels. On the other hand, Chile, while
maintaining its number three rank, has increased its imports YTD by nearly 85%.
Likewise Mexico has increased its pulp imports by over one-third compared to
prior YTD levels. As a supply source, Uruguay has climbed to the sixth-ranked
source for imported pulp in 2014 after not recording any shipments through the
first 11 months of 2013. Among 2013’s YTD top-ten sources for pulp, Germany (ranked
tenth YTD in 2013) posted the
largest percentage drop (nearly 28%), dropping to the 12th-ranked
source for 2014 YTD.
Click image
for larger view
* Paper and paperboard imports (3,126
thousand tonnes YTD) have expanded by over 7% YTD compared to prior YTD
activity. Once again Canada leads the way, accounting for nearly 88% of the
total import volume and 67% of the YTD increase (139 of 208 thousand tonnes). One
notable development on a percentage basis is Australia, which has vaulted from
being the 29th ranked supplier during the first 11 months of 2013 to
the 7th ranked supplier during the first 11 months of 2014, posting
an eye-popping increase of 13,293% (from 164 tonnes YTD through November 2013
to 21,925 tonnes YTD through November 2014). In other top-ten changes from
2013, Sweden dropped from number four to number five, with pulp and paperboard
imports declining by over 18%, Germany dropped from number six to number eight
on a 15% decrease, and Indonesia dropped from eight to number nine on a 29%
decline.
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.