Click image
for larger version
In
its first (“advance”) estimate of 3Q2016 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau
of Economic Analysis (BEA) pegged growth of the U.S. economy at a
seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +2.91%, up +1.49 percentage points
from 2Q2016, and much faster than consensus expectations
of 2.5%.
All
groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE), private
domestic investment (PDI), net exports (NetX), and government consumption
expenditures (GCE) -- contributed to 3Q growth.
Most
of the reported improvement in the headline number came from a +1.77% quarter-over-quarter
(QoQ) gain in inventories, a +0.96% rise in exports, and a +0.39% uptick in
governmental spending. Offsetting those improvements was an aggregate -1.41%
reduction in the headline number from softening consumer spending on both goods
and services. Fixed investments remained in contraction at a -0.09% annualized
rate.
As
we have indicated in the past, the BEA’s treatment of inventories can introduce
noise and seriously distort the headline number over short terms -- which the
BEA admits by also publishing a secondary headline that excludes the impact of
inventories. The BEA’s “bottom line” real final sales of domestic product was a
+2.30% growth rate, down 0.28% from 2Q2016; based on real final sales, then,
economic growth actually softened during 3Q. On the other hand, 3Q2016’s
year-over-year GDP growth rate was +1.50%, slightly faster than 2Q2016’s +1.28%.
Click image
for larger version
Consumer
Metrics Institute noticed several cautionary items in the report:
--
Consumer spending took a major hit (it was nearly halved) in 3Q. This finding
is consistent with most consumer sentiment surveys, and it is plausibly a
consequence of the continued weak growth in disposable income.
--
It is possible that the “fear, uncertainty and doubt” surrounding an especially
uncivil election campaign contributed to consumer sentiments and the spending
malaise. If so, that trend has almost undoubtedly extended into 4Q as well.
--
Federal fiscal year-end (“use it or lose it”) spending likely is responsible
for the uptick in GCE and, if consistent with prior years, could be at least
partially reversed in 4Q2016.
--
Most of the QoQ improvements in the contributions to the headline number came
from two especially noisy line items: inventories and exports. These line items
are susceptible to significant distortions/anomalies caused by commodity price
and currency swings -- even as physical quantities of inventories or export
transactions are relatively unchanged.
--
It could be argued that inventory growth after five consecutive quarters of
contraction was simply an overdue reversion to a zero-sum trend line. Or,
alternately, they are just another indication of weakening end-consumer demand.
--
The BEA's own “bottom line” real final-sales growth metric weakened QoQ.
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.