Click image
for larger version
In
its first (“advance”) estimate of 4Q2016 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau
of Economic Analysis (BEA) pegged growth of the U.S. economy at a seasonally
adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +1.87%, down by nearly one-half (-1.66
percentage points) from 3Q2016. On a year-over-year (YoY) basis, which should
eliminate any residual seasonality distortions present in quarter-over-quarter
(QoQ) comparisons, GDP was up 1.91% from 4Q2015. On that basis, growth in 4Q2016
improved by 0.25 percentage point compared to 3Q.
The
QoQ slowdown in 4Q’s headline growth rate came from a number of sources: growth
of consumer spending on services fell by more than half (-0.68%); exports contracted
(-1.69%) while imports expanded (exerting an additional drag of -0.86%).
Partially offsetting those declines were upticks in consumer spending on goods
(+0.34%), and increases in the growth rate for commercial fixed investment
(+0.65%) and inventories (+0.51%).
Real
final sales of domestic product (the BEA’s “bottom line” indicator of economic
activity that excludes the influence of inventories) recorded a sub-1% growth
rate (+0.87%), down over 2.17% from 3Q.
The
BEA used an inflation rate of 2.12% to arrive at its 4Q real GDP estimate. Concurrent
inflation recorded by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in its CPI-U index
was 3.41%. Underestimating inflation results in correspondingly over-optimistic
growth rates; were the BEA’s “nominal” data deflated using the CPI-U, the
headline GDP growth number would have been a much lower +0.62% annualized rate.
Click image
for larger version
The
euphoric pre-election view of the economy has given way to a more sober assessment
post-election. “The U.S. economy was in decent, if unspectacular, shape at the
end of 2016,” said Gus
Faucher, senior economist at PNC Financial Services. That a 1.9% growth
rate is described as “decent” indicates just how low the bar has been set in
many economists’ minds.
The
3Q growth rate of 3.5% “was truly impressive,” concluded the analysts at Consumer
Metrics Institute. “January’s fourth quarter 1.9% is just ‘kind of, sort of’
okay. And the BEA’s “bottom line” sub-1% growth rate is somewhat less than okay.
It will be interesting to see just how this headline holds up in the upcoming
revisions.”
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely
for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not
constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.