Click image
for larger view
Click image
for larger view
Sales of new
single-family houses in January 2017 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR)
of 555,000 units (576,000 expected).
This is 3.7% (±18.5 percent)* above the revised December rate of 535,000 (originally
536,000) and is 5.5% (±25.4 percent)* above the January 2016 SAAR of 526,000;
the not-seasonally adjusted year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above)
was 5.1%. For a longer-term perspective, January sales were 60.0% below the
“bubble” peak and 21.6% below the long-term, pre-2000 average.
The
median sales price of new houses sold in January was $312,900 (-$3,300 or
-1.0%). The average sales price was $360,900 (-$18,000 or -4.8%). Starter homes
(those priced below $200,000) comprised 14.6% of the total sold, down from
January 2016’s 23.1%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as
much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 made up 4.9%
of those sold in January, a slight bump from January 2016’s record-low (for
that month of the year, going back to 2002) of 2.6%
* 90% confidence interval includes zero.
The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude
that the actual change is different from zero.
Click image
for larger view
As
mentioned in our post
about housing permits, starts and completions in January, single-unit
completions rose by 33,000 units (+4.3%). Because the increase in completions
outpaced that of sales, new-home inventory expanded in absolute (+9,000 units) terms
but remained stable in months-of-inventory terms.
Click image
for larger view
Existing home sales
jumped by 180,000 units (+3.3%) in January, to a decade-high 5.690 million units
(SAAR), above expectations
of 5.575 million. Inventory of existing homes expanded in absolute (+40,000
units), but remained stable in months-of-inventory terms. Although the rise in existing-home
sales exceeded that of new homes in January, the share of total sales comprised
of new homes inched up by less than 0.1%, to 8.9%. The median price of previously
owned homes sold in January retreated by $4,400 (-1.9%), to $228,900.
Click image
for larger view
Housing
affordability degraded marginally despite the median price of existing
homes for sale in December falling by $2.500 (-1.1%; +3.8 YoY), to $233,500.
Concurrently, Standard &
Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic
Home Price indices posted a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +0.2% (+5.9%
YoY), bringing home prices to a new all-time high.
“Home
prices continue to advance, with the national average rising faster than at any
time in the last two-and-a-half years,” said David Blitzer, Managing Director
and Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “With all 20
cities seeing prices rise over the last year, questions about whether this is a
normal housing market or if prices could be heading for a fall are natural. In
comparing current home price movements to history, it is necessary to adjust
for inflation. Consumer prices are higher today than 20 or 30 years ago, while
the inflation rate is lower. Looking at real or inflation-adjusted home prices
based on the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Index and the Consumer
Price Index, the annual increase in home prices is currently 3.8%. Since 1975,
the average pace is 1.3%; about two-thirds of the time, the rate is between -4%
and +7%. Home prices are rising, but the speed is not alarming.
“One
factor behind rising home prices is low inventory. While sales of existing
single family homes passed five million units at annual rates in January, the
highest since 2007, the inventory of homes for sales remains quite low with a
3.6 month supply. New home sales at 555,000 in 2016 are up from recent years
but remain below the average pace of 700,000 per year since 1990. Another
factor supporting rising home prices is mortgage rates. A 30-year fixed rate
mortgage today is 4.2% compared to the 6.4% average since 1990. Another
indicator that home price levels are normal can be seen in the charts of
Seattle and Portland OR. In the boom-bust of 2005-2009, prices of low, medium,
and high-tier homes moved together, while in other periods, including now, the
tiers experienced different patterns.”
Click image
for larger view
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi
Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction
and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation
regarding any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.