Click image
for larger version
The
Bureau
of Economic Analysis (BEA) estimated 1Q2013 growth in real U.S. gross domestic product (GDP ) at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate of +1.8 percent, 0.6
percentage point lower than the previous (preliminary) 1Q estimate. This growth
rate was 1.4 percentage points higher than the 4Q2012 estimate. Personal
consumption expenditures (PCE) and private domestic investment (PDI) added to 1Q
growth, in that order; government consumption expenditures (GCE) and net exports
(NetX) dragged on growth. For reasons explained below, this latest estimate is perhaps
a truer reflection of the state of the economy than were the prior 1Q
estimates.
Click image
for larger version
“A
significant revision to consumer spending on services was large enough to
account for the entire downward adjustment in the headline number,” wrote the
analysts at Consumer
Metrics Institute (CMI ). “That was accompanied by materially weaker exports
and fixed investments. All of those revisions were enough to lower the BEA's
bottom line "real final sales of domestic product" by over 0.5
percent.”
For
this set of revisions, CMI observed, the BEA assumed annualized net aggregate
inflation of 1.26 percent. In contrast, during the first quarter (i.e., from
December to March) the seasonally adjusted CPI -U index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS ) rose by 2.10 percent (annualized), and the price index published by
the Billion Prices Project (BPP ) rose at
an annualized rate of 5.35 percent. Had the CPI -U been used to convert the "nominal" GDP numbers into "real" numbers, the reported headline growth
rate would have been a much more modest 0.96 percent. And if the BPP index (which, CMI argued, best reflects the experiences of the American
consumer) had been used as the deflator, the economy would have been reported
to have been contracting at a -2.30 percent annualized rate.
Finally,
real per capita disposable income was revised lower once more. In this report
real per capita disposable income contracted during the quarter at an
astonishing -9.21 percent annualized rate.
At best this new release reports an
economy with lackluster growth, created at great expense by a combination of
unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus that have obviously progressed well
past the point of diminishing returns. To be fair, many other national
governments would be thrilled to be reporting a 1.78 percent annualized growth
rate. But that observation in itself (without mentioning the plunging export
numbers) also reflect global economic headwinds that do not bode well for
sustaining even lackluster numbers over the balance of the year.
And we continue to note the one truly
serious domestic issue within the data:
-- Real per capita disposable incomes
took yet another hit. The astonishing annualized contraction of real per capita
disposable income has now reached -9.21 percent -- dwarfing the -7.52 percent
contraction rate recorded in 1Q2009 (the worst quarterly contraction recorded
during the official duration of the "Great Recession").
From time to time we may quarrel with
the quality of the BEA's deflators. And frankly we may even find that at face
value the lackluster numbers amount to nothing more than a sham
"recovery." But the most shocking part of this report is glaringly
obvious from the real per capita disposable income numbers: all of the
unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus has left American households
materially worse off than they were two years ago.
Troubling
indeed.
The foregoing comments represent the
general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors,
and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and
discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding
any investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.