1Q2021 Gross Domestic Product: Second Estimate

Click image for larger version

In its second estimate of 1Q2021 gross domestic product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) held the growth rate of the U.S. economy at a seasonally adjusted and annualized rate (SAAR) of +6.40% (+6.5% expected), up 0.01 percentage point (PP) from the “advance” estimate (“1Qv1”) and +2.08PP from 4Q2020.

As with 1Qv1, two groupings of GDP components -- personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and government consumption expenditures (GCE) -- were the drivers behind the expansion, whereas private domestic investment (PDI) and net exports (NetX) made minor negative offsets.

Although the headline number was unchanged, the underlying line items moved around a little. As for details:

PCE. Contribution to 1Q headline: +7.40PP; +5.82PP from 4Q and +0.38PP from 1Qv1. Downward revisions to health care spending (-$26.9 billion, nominal) were offset by upward revisions to spending on motor vehicles and parts (+$18.8B) and receipts from sales of goods and services by nonprofit institutions (+$18.9B) -- which do not have market-derived value.

PDI. Contribution to 1Q headline: -0.82PP; -5.23PP from 4Q but +0.05PP from 1Qv1. Upward revisions to software (+$12.2B) and residential fixed investment (+$5.8B) lessened by decline.

NetX. Contribution to 1Q headline: -1.20PP; +0.33PP from 4Q but -0.33PP from 1Qv1. Goods exports were revised down by -$10.0B, and imports were revised up by a combined +$4.5B; recall that imports are inversely correlated with the GDP headline.

GCE. Contribution to 1Q headline: +1.02PP; +1.16PP from 4Q but -0.10PP from 1Qv1. The downward revision (-$6.5B) was borne almost entirely at the state and local levels.

The BEA's real final sales of domestic product -- which ignores inventories -- was revised to +9.18% (+0.14PP), a level 6.23PP above the 4Q estimate. 

Click image for larger version

Consumer Metric Institute’s Rick Davis summarized the key points of this report as follows:

-- Although there is no material improvement in the headline number, consumer spending on goods was better than first estimated.

-- Even though household disposable income continues to benefit from federal relief programs, most of that increase is being pocketed. The jury is still out on how free spending consumers will be as the post-pandemic normalization continues into the summer.

“This is yet another example of when month-to-month data from the BEA would be a vast improvement over the existing 80+ year old quarter-to-quarter regimen,” Davis concluded. “Simply stated, revising January through March might be academically nice, but telling us what was happening in April (or indeed, early May) would be so much better.”

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Residential Sales, Inventory and Prices

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Sales of new single-family houses in April 2021 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 863,000 units (957,000 expected). This is 5.9% (±11.2%)* below the revised March rate of 917,000 units (previously 1.021 million), but 48.3% (±24.5%) above the April 2020 estimate of 582,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted (NSA) year-over-year comparison (shown in the table above) was +50.0%. For longer-term perspectives, NSA sales were 37.9% below the “housing bubble” peak but 49.2% above the long-term, pre-2000 average.

The median sales price of new houses sold in April jumped ($38,200 or +11.4% MoM) to $372,400; meanwhile, the average sales price rose to a new record-high $435,400 ($34,900 or +8.7% MoM). Starter homes (defined here as those priced below $200,000) comprised 2.6% of the total sold, down from the year-earlier 11.5%; prior to the Great Recession starter homes represented as much as 61% of total new-home sales. Homes priced below $150,000 were 1.3% of sales, down from 1.9% a year earlier.

* 90% confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different from zero.

Click image for larger view

As mentioned in our post about housing permits, starts and completions in April, single-unit completions barely budged by +1,000 units (+0.1%). Because sales fell (54,000 units; -5.9%), inventory for sale rose in absolute (+12,000 units) and months-of-inventory (+0.4 month) terms. 

Click image for larger view

Existing home sales retreated further in April (160,000 units or -2.7%), to a SAAR of 5.85 million units (6.085 million expected). Inventory of existing homes for sale expanded in absolute (90,000 units) and months-of-inventory (0.3 month) terms. Because resales fell on a smaller proportional basis than new-home sales, the share of total sales comprised of new homes slipped to 12.9%. The median price of previously owned homes sold in April advanced to $341.600 ($15,300 or +4.7% MoM).

Click image for larger view

Housing affordability gained 2.3 percentage points even though the median price of existing homes for sale in March rose by $19,400 (+6.20% MoM; +18.4 YoY), to $334,500. Concurrently, Standard & Poor’s reported that the U.S. National Index in the S&P Case-Shiller CoreLogic Home Price indices rose at a not-seasonally adjusted monthly change of +2.0% (+13.2% YoY).

“More than 30 years of S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller data put these results into historical context. The National Composite’s 13.2% gain was last exceeded more than 15 years ago in December 2005, and lies very comfortably in the top decile of historical performance,” said Craig Lazzara, Managing Director and Global Head of Index Investment Strategy at S&P DJI. “The unusual strength is reflected across all 20 cities; March’s price gains in every city are above that city’s median level, and rank in the top quartile of all reports in 19 cities.”

“These data are consistent with the hypothesis that Covid has encouraged potential buyers to move from urban apartments to suburban homes,” Lazzara added. “This demand may represent buyers who accelerated purchases that would have happened anyway over the next several years. Alternatively, there may have been a secular change in preferences, leading to a permanent shift in the demand curve for housing.” 

Click image for larger view

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Residential Permits, Starts and Completions

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Builders started construction of privately-owned housing units in April at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 1,569,000 units (1.705 million expected). This is 9.5% (±10.8%)* below the revised March estimate of 1,733,000 (originally 1.739 million units), but 67.3% (±21.6%) above the April 2020 SAAR of 938,000 units; the not-seasonally adjusted YoY change (shown in the table above) was -66.0%. 

Single-family housing starts in April were at a rate of 1,087,000; this is 13.4% (±7.9%) below the revised March figure of 1,255,000 units (+58.2% YoY). Multi-family: 482,000 units (+0.8% MoM; +88.5% YoY). 

* 90% confidence interval (CI) is not statistically different from zero. The Census Bureau does not publish CIs for the entire multi-unit category.

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Total completions were at a SAAR of 1,449,000 units.  This is 4.4% (±8.6percent)* below the revised March estimate of 1,515,000 (originally 1.580 million units), but 21.7% (±15.8%) above the April 2020 SAAR of 1,191,000 units; the NSA comparison: +22.0% YoY. 

Single-family completions were at a SAAR of 1,045,000 units; this is 0.1% (±8.4%)* above the revised March rate of 1,044,000 units (+20.6% YoY). Multi-family: 404,000 units (-14.2% MoM; +25.7% YoY).

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Total permits amounted to a SAAR of 1,760,000 units (1.780 million expected). This is 0.3% (±1.2%)* above the revised March rate of 1,755,000 (originally 1.766 million units) and 60.9% (±1.8%) above the April 2020 SAAR of 1,094,000 units; the NSA comparison: +63.2% YoY. 

Single-family permits were at a SAAR of 1,149,000; this is 3.8% (±1.0%) below the revised March figure of 1,194,000 units (+69.2% YoY). Multi-family: 611,000 units (+8.9% MoM; +52.2% YoY).

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Builder confidence held stable in May despite growing concerns over the price and availability of most building materials, including lumber. The May NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) showed that builder confidence in the market for newly built single-family homes was 83, unchanged from April.

“Builder confidence in the market remains strong due to a lack of resale inventory, low mortgage interest rates, and a growing demographic of prospective home buyers,” said NAHB Chairman Chuck Fowke. “However, first-time and first-generation home buyers are particularly at risk for losing a purchase due to cost hikes associated with increasingly scarce material availability. Policymakers must take note and find ways to increase production of domestic building materials, including lumber and steel, and suspend tariffs on imports of construction materials.”

“Low interest rates are supporting housing affordability in a market where the cost of most materials is rising,” said NAHB Chief Economist Robert Dietz. “In recent months, aggregate residential construction material costs were up 12% year over year, and our surveys suggest those costs are rising further. Some builders are slowing sales to manage their own supply chains, which means growing affordability challenges for a market in critical need of more inventory.”

With labor and lot availability a challenge in many markets, Dietz cautioned that “home buyers should expect rising prices throughout 2021 as the cost of materials, land and labor continue to rise.”

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

March 2021 International Trade (Softwood Lumber)

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Softwood lumber exports rose (13 MMBF or +14.1%) in March, and imports jumped (313 MMBF or +27.4%). Exports were 1 MMBF (+1.4%) above year-earlier levels; imports were 90 MMBF (+6.6%) higher. As a result, the year-over-year (YoY) net export deficit was 89 MMBF (+7.0%) larger. Also, the average net export deficit for the 12 months ending March 2021 was 8.4% larger than the average of the same months a year earlier (the “YoY MA(12) % Chng” series shown in the graph above).

Click image for larger view

North America (57.4%; of which Canada: 35.4%; Mexico: 22.0%), Asia (15.6%; especially China: 4.0%; and Japan: 3.4%), and the Caribbean: 19.6% (especially the Dominican Republic: 4.7%) were the primary destinations for U.S. softwood lumber exports. Year-to-date (YTD) exports to China were -43.3% relative to the same months in 2020. Meanwhile, Canada was the source of most (85.5%) of softwood lumber imports into the United States. Imports from Canada were 10.9% higher YTD than the same months in 2020. Overall, YTD exports were down 9.3% compared to 2020; imports: +12.4%.

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

U.S. softwood lumber export activity through the West Coast customs region represented 39.0% of the U.S. total; Gulf: 23.4%, and Eastern: 24.3%. Seattle (23.1% of the U.S. total) was the single most-active district, followed by Mobile (14.1%) and San Diego (12.7%). At the same time, Great Lakes customs region handled 57.9% of softwood lumber imports -- most notably the Duluth, MN district (23.3%) -- coming into the United States. 

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

Southern yellow pine comprised 18.2% of all softwood lumber exports; Douglas-fir (15.2%) and treated lumber (13.8%) were also significant. Southern pine exports were down 32.5% YTD relative to 2020, while Doug-fir: +1.3%; and treated: -10.7%.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization and Capacity

Click image for larger version

Total industrial production (IP) increased 0.7% in April (+1.2% expected). The indexes for mining and utilities increased 0.7% and 2.6%, respectively; the index for manufacturing rose 0.4% despite a drop in motor vehicle assemblies that principally resulted from shortages of semiconductors. An important contributor to the gain in factory output was the return to operation of plants that were damaged by February's severe weather in the south central region of the country and had remained offline in March. The weather-induced drop in total IP in February and the subsequent rebound in March are now estimated to have been larger than reported last month.

At 106.3% of its 2012 average in April, total industrial production has moved up 16.5% from its level in April 2020 (the trough of the pandemic), but it was 2.7% below its pre-pandemic (February 2020) level. 

Click image for larger version

Click image for larger version

Industry Groups

Manufacturing output rose 0.4% in April (NAICS manufacturing: +0.4% MoM; +23.3% YoY), with decreases of 0.4% and 1.1% for durable and other manufacturing (publishing and logging), respectively, outweighed by an increase of 1.3% for nondurable manufacturing. The index for motor vehicles and parts fell 4.3%; excluding the motor vehicle sector, factory output advanced 0.7%, primarily reflecting a further recovery in chemicals as additional factories that had sustained weather-related damage during February reopened. Elsewhere, industry results were mixed, with supply chain difficulties possibly hindering production (wood products: +0.2%). Among nondurables, most major industry categories recorded gains, but paper products (-0.1%), printing and support, and plastics and rubber products recorded modest losses.

The output of utilities moved up 2.6% in April after dropping substantially in March, when unseasonably warm weather reduced demand for heating. Mining production increased 0.7% in April; the index fell more than 9% in February because of the winter storm and recovered much of that loss in March.

Click image for larger version

Capacity utilization (CU) for the industrial sector rose 0.5 percentage point (PP) in April to 74.9%, a rate that is 4.7PP below its long-run (1972–2020) average.

Manufacturing CU increased 0.3PP in April to 74.1% (NAICS manufacturing: +0.4% MoM, to 74.7%; wood products: +0.2%; paper products: -0.1%). The operating rates for mining and utilities rose 0.7PP and 1.7 PP, respectively. The rates for all three sectors remained below their long-run averages.

Click image for larger version

Capacity at the all-industries level was unchanged MoM (-0.1 % YoY) at 142.0% of 2012 output. Manufacturing (NAICS basis) was also unchanged (-0.1% YoY) at 140.1%. Wood products: +0.1% (+0.4% YoY) to 170.2%; paper products: +0.1% (-0.3% YoY) at 109.1%.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Consumer and Producer Price Indices (incl. Forest Products)

Click image for larger version

Consumer Price Index

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.8% in April (+0.2% expected) after rising 0.6% in March. The index for used cars and trucks rose 10.0% in April. This was the largest one-month increase since the series began in 1953, and it accounted for over a third of the seasonally adjusted all-items increase. The food index increased in April, rising 0.4% as the indexes for food at home and food away from home both increased. The energy index decreased slightly, as a decline in the index for gasoline in April more than offset increases in the indexes for electricity and natural gas.

The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.9% in April, its largest monthly increase since April 1982. Nearly all major component indexes increased in April. Along with the index for used cars and trucks, the indexes for shelter, airline fares, recreation, motor vehicle insurance, and household furnishings and operations were among the indexes with a large impact on the overall increase.  

The all-items index rose 4.2% for the 12 months ending April, the largest 12-month increase since a 4.9% increase for the period ending September 2008. Similarly, the index for all items less food and energy rose 3.0% over the last12 months, a larger increase than the 1.6% rise over the 12 month period ending in March. The energy index rose 25.1% over the last 12-months, and the food index increased 2.4%.

Producer Price Index

The Producer Price Index for final demand (PPI-FD) increased 0.6% in April (+0.3% expected). Final demand prices rose 1.0% in March and 0.5% in February. About two-thirds of the April advance in the final demand index can be traced to a 0.6% increase in prices for final demand services. The index for final demand goods also moved up 0.6%.

The final demand index moved up 6.2% for the 12 months ended in April, the largest advance since 12-month data were first calculated in November 2010.The index for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services rose 0.7% in April following an increase of 0.6% in March. For the 12 months ended in April, prices for final demand less foods, energy, and trade services moved up 4.6%, the largest advance since 12-month data were first calculated in August 2014.

Final Demand

Final demand services: Prices for final demand services rose 0.6% in April, the fourth consecutive advance. Half of the broad-based increase in April is attributable to the index for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing, which moved up 0.5%. Margins for final demand trade services also rose 0.5%, and the index for final demand transportation and warehousing services jumped 2.1%. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)

Product detail: Within the index for final demand services in April, prices for portfolio management rose 1.5%. The indexes for airline passenger services; food retailing; fuels and lubricants retailing; physician care; and hardware, building materials, and supplies retailing also moved higher. Conversely, margins for machinery and vehicle wholesaling fell 5.6%. The indexes for apparel wholesaling and for securities brokerage, dealing, investment advice, and related services also declined.

Final demand goods: Prices for final demand goods climbed 0.6% in April, after rising 1.7% in March. Leading the April advance, the index for final demand goods less foods and energy increased 1.0%. Prices for final demand foods moved up 2.1%. In contrast, the index for final demand energy fell 2.4%.

Product detail: A major factor in the April increase in prices for final demand goods was the index for steel mill products, which jumped 18.4%. Prices for beef and veal, pork, residential natural gas, plastic resins and materials, and dairy products also moved higher. Conversely, the index for gasoline fell 3.4%. Prices for chicken eggs and for carbon steel scrap also declined.

Click image for larger version

The not-seasonally adjusted price indexes we track all rose on both MoM and YoY bases.

Click image for larger version

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Employment Report

Click image for larger view

The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) establishment survey showed non-farm employers added a disappointing 266,000 jobs in April (well below consensus expectations of +1 million). “Adding insult to injury,” February and March employment changes were revised down by a combined 78,000 (February: +68,000; March: -146,000). Meanwhile, the unemployment rate (based upon the BLS’s household survey) ticked up fractionally to 6.1% as (re)entrants to the civilian labor force grew (+430,000) faster than the ranks of the employed (+328,000). 

Click image for larger view

Observations from the employment reports include:

* Goods-producing industries lost 16,000 jobs; service-providers: +282,000. Notable job gains in leisure and hospitality (+331,000), other services (+44,000), and local government education (+31,100) were partially offset by declines in temporary help services (-111,400), and couriers and messengers (-77,400). Manufacturing contracted by 18,000 jobs. That result is somewhat consistent with the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing employment sub-index, which expanded more slowly in April. Wood Products employment fell by 7,200 (ISM decreased); Paper and Paper Products: -1,600 (ISM decreased); Construction: Unchanged (ISM increased).

Click image for larger view

* The number of employment-age persons not in the labor force fell (330,000) to 100.1 million. As a result, the employment-population ratio (EPR) ticked up to 57.9%; i.e., nearly six in 10 of the employment-age population are presently employed. 

Click image for larger view

* Because the civilian labor force expanded by 430,000 in April, the labor force participation rate rose to 61.7%. Although average hourly earnings of all private employees increased by $0.21 (to $30.17), the year-over-year increase slumped to just +0.3%. For all production and nonsupervisory employees (shown above), the tale was much the same: hourly wages rose by $0.20, to $25.45 (+1.2% YoY). Since the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls expanded by 0.1 hour (to 35.0 hours), average weekly earnings increased by $10.35, to $1,055.95 (+2.5% YoY). With the consumer price index running at an annual rate of +2.6% in March, those who are employed appear to be keeping up with the official inflation rate.

Click image for larger view

* Full-time jobs rose (+358,000) to 126.2 million. Workers employed part time for economic reasons (shown in the graph above) -- e.g., slack work or business conditions, or could find only part-time work -- fell by 583,000, whereas those working part time for non-economic reasons retreated by 45,000; multiple-job holders advanced by 99,000.

Click image for larger view

For a “sanity test” of the job numbers, we consult employment withholding taxes published by the U.S. Treasury. Although “noisy” and highly seasonal, the data show the amount withheld in April dropped by $58.6 billion, to $228.0 billion (-20.5% MoM; +24.9% YoY). To reduce some of the monthly volatility and determine broader trends, we average the most recent three months of data and estimate a percentage change from the same months in the previous year. The average of the three months ending April was 12.8% above the year-earlier average.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 ISM and Markit Surveys

Click image for larger version

The Institute for Supply Management‘s (ISM) monthly sentiment survey showed a decrease in the proportion of U.S. manufacturers reporting expansion in April. The PMI registered 60.7%, a decline of 3.9 percentage points (PP) from the March reading. (50% is the breakpoint between contraction and expansion.) ISM’s manufacturing survey represents under 10% of U.S. employment and about 20% of the overall economy. The input prices sub-index exhibited the only significant increase (+4.0PP); the production sub-index dropped the most (-5.6PP).

Despite the headline retreat, “manufacturing performed well for the 11^th straight month, with demand, consumption and inputs registering strong growth compared to March,” observed Timothy Fiore, Chair of ISM’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. “Labor-market difficulties at panelists’ companies and their suppliers persist. End-user lead times (for refilling customers’ inventories) are extending. This is due to very high demand and output restrictions, as supply chains continue to respond to strong demand amid COVID-19 impacts.”

Click image for larger version

The services sector -- which accounts for 80% of the economy and 90% of employment -- edged lower from March’s all-time high of service-sector respondents reporting expansion (-1.0PP, to 62.7%). The most noteworthy changes in the sub-indexes included new orders (-4.0PP), slow deliveries (+5.1PP), and order backlogs (+5.5PP).

Click image for larger version

Of the industries we track, only Ag & Forestry contracted. Respondents included the following:

Construction. “Consistent with the past year, labor continues to be the biggest issue we are facing. Finding and retaining labor -- skilled and unskilled -- is highly challenging and frustrating. As the challenges continue, we are not accepting all the work that we could if we had the labor.”

Real Estate. “Business levels are quite strong as we head into the spring construction season.”

 

Findings of IHS Markit‘s April survey results were generally consistent with their ISM counterparts.

Manufacturing. Strongest improvement in operating conditions on record amid marked uptick in client demand

Key findings:

* New order growth accelerates to 11-year high
* Greatest deterioration in vendor performance on record leads costs to soar
* Job creation quickens as backlogs of work accumulate markedly

 

Services. Business activity expands at fastest pace on record amid marked uptick in client demand

Key findings:

* Most marked upturns in output and new orders on record
* Employment growth accelerates
* Cost pressures strongest on record

 

Commentary by Chris Williamson, Markit’s chief business economist:

Manufacturing. “U.S. manufacturers reported the biggest boom in at least 14 years during April. Demand surged at a pace not seen for 11 years amid growing recovery hopes and fresh stimulus measures.

“Supply chain delays worsened, however, running at the highest yet recorded by the survey, choking production at many companies. Worst affected were consumer-facing firms, where a lack of inputs has caused production to fall below order book growth to a record extent in over the past two months as household spending leapt higher.

“Suppliers have been able to command higher prices due to the strength of demand for inputs, pushing material costs higher at a rate not seen since 2008.

“Attempts to expand capacity via hiring extra staff gained further momentum, though in some cases staff shortages were an additional constraint on production. However, with confidence in the outlook continuing to run at one of the highest levels seen over the past seven years, buoyed by vaccine roll-outs and stimulus, further investment in production capacity should be seen in coming months, helping alleviate some of the price pressures.”

 

Services. “Thanks to the cocktail of a successful vaccine roll-out, the reopening of the economy, ultra-accommodative monetary policy and injection of fresh fiscal stimulus, businesses are reporting the strongest surge in demand seen for at least a decade.

“The upswing in demand has led to one of the strongest months of job creation yet recorded by the survey as business prepares for better times ahead.

“The biggest threat to the outlook remains new virus variants, which will inevitably mean international travel and associated business activity will stay under pressure for some time to come, but in the meantime the domestic economy is faring very well, especially consumer facing industries.

“Another concern is prices, with a record increase in service sector charges highlighting how inflationary pressures are by no means confined to the manufacturing sector. Indicators of price pressures and capacity constraints will need to be monitored closely to assess whether such price rises are transitory.”

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Monthly Average Crude Oil Price

Click image for larger view

The monthly average U.S.-dollar price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil nudged $0.62 (-1.0%) lower, to $61.72 per barrel in April. That decrease occurred within the context of a marginally weaker U.S. dollar (broad trade-weighted index basis -- goods and services), the lagged impacts of February’s weather-induced drop of 1.15 million barrels-per-day (BPD) in the amount of petroleum products demanded/supplied (to 17.4 million BPD, and a decline in accumulated oil stocks (April average: 492 million barrels).

Click image for larger view

From the 3 May 2021 issue of The Energy Bulletin:

Futures prices rose [in April] with much positive economic data and signs of a fuel consumption revival in key economies offsetting a worsening coronavirus crisis elsewhere. Futures in New York rose last week, extending their monthly gain to 7.5%. The near-certain likelihood of higher fuel consumption in the US, China, and the UK has brightened the overall demand outlook, even as a resurgent pandemic in India, Brazil, and Japan cloud those prospects. OPEC and its allies see world consumption rebounding by 6 million b/d this year, while Goldman Sachs says demand could post a record jump as vaccination rates increase.

Despite high vaccination rates in many parts of the world, people appear to be still wary of public transit, opting for personal vehicles. Called "the great car comeback" by Bloomberg, the trend is visible in locations as diverse as Tel Aviv, Moscow, and Bucharest. Car sales in Europe soared by 63 percent last month to 1.39 million, which was high not just compared to the previous year when sales of everything but handwash and toilet paper were subdued.

However, India's worsening COVID outbreak could disturb the nearly balanced global oil market, which will show a surplus of as much as 1.4 million b/d next month amid a sizeable loss of demand from the world's third-largest oil importer. India has seen fuel demand decline in recent weeks as record-high new coronavirus infections prompt lockdowns and curfews in many states in the country of 1.3 billion. India's combined demand for diesel and gasoline is set to drop by as much as 20% in April compared to March.

Click image for larger view

Selected highlights from the 30 April 2021 issue of OilPrice.com’s Oil & Energy Insider include:

Shale CEOs stick with restraint, mostly. Ovintiv CEO Doug Suttles told Bloomberg that the industry is maintaining capital discipline. At the same time, Continental Resources said that it would ramp up activity in the Bakken this year.

U.S. Senate rescinds Trump methane rule. The Senate voted to repeal a Trump-era rule that weakened methane regulations. If signed into law as expected, the move will restore Obama-era regulations.

India's covid crisis could lead to a global oil surplus. India’s worsening COVID outbreak is set to disturb the nearly balanced global oil market, which will show a surplus of oil supply of as much as 1.4 million barrels per day (bpd) next month amid a sizeable loss of demand from the world’s third-largest oil importer, Rystad Energy says.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

March 2021 Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and New & Unfilled Orders

Click image for larger view

Click image for larger view

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the value of manufactured-goods shipments in March increased $10.8 billion or 2.1 percent to $513.6 billion. Durable goods shipments increased $7.0 billion or 2.8 percent to $257.6 billion, led by transportation equipment. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments increased $3.8 billion or 1.5 percent to $256.0 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Shipments of wood products rose by 4.5%; paper: +0.7%.

Click image for larger view

Inventories increased $5.2 billion or 0.7 percent to $707.7 billion. The inventories-to-shipments ratio was 1.38, down from 1.40 in February. Inventories of durable goods increased $4.3 billion or 1.0 percent to $431.9 billion, led by transportation equipment. Nondurable goods inventories increased $0.9 billion or 0.3 percent to $275.8 billion, led by petroleum and coal products. Inventories of wood products rose by 1.0%; paper: +0.1%.

Click image for larger view

New orders increased $5.8 billion or 1.1 percent to $512.9 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders rose by $7.1 billion or 1.7% (+12.1% YoY). Durable goods orders increased $2.0 billion or 0.8 percent to $256.9 billion, led by fabricated metal products. New orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- a proxy for business investment spending -- increased by $0.9 billion or 1.2% (+13.7% YoY). New orders for nondurable goods increased $3.8 billion or 1.5 percent to $256.0 billion.

Click image for larger view

Unfilled durable-goods orders increased $4.5 billion or 0.4 percent to $1,087.8 billion, led by fabricated metal products. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio was 6.21, down from 6.30 in February. Real unfilled orders, which had been a good litmus test for sector growth, show an even more-negative picture; in real terms, unfilled orders in June 2014 were back to 97% of their December 2008 peak. Real unfilled orders then jumped to 102% of the prior peak in July 2014, thanks to the largest-ever batch of aircraft orders. Since then, however, real unfilled orders have been trending lower.

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.

April 2021 Currency Exchange Rates

Click image for larger view

In April the monthly average value of the U.S. dollar (USD) depreciated versus Canada’s “loonie” (-0.6%) and euro (-0.5%), but appreciated against the Japanese yen (+0.3%). On the broad trade-weighted index basis (goods and services), the USD strengthened by 1.2% against a basket of 26 currencies. 

Click image for larger view

The foregoing comments represent the general economic views and analysis of Delphi Advisors, and are provided solely for the purpose of information, instruction and discourse. They do not constitute a solicitation or recommendation regarding any investment.